Skip to content

Conversation

@jrepp
Copy link
Owner

@jrepp jrepp commented Nov 17, 2025

Summary

This PR includes enhancements to template tests and addresses code review feedback from previous PRs.

Changes

Test Enhancements (PR #38)

  • Expanded test_required_fields_basic to test all document types (adr, rfc, memo, prd, None)
  • Improved test coverage for ensure_required_fields() function
  • Better validation of required field behavior across document types

Review Feedback Fixes

  • Removed unused doc_type parameter from ensure_required_fields()
  • Removed hardcoded test count badge from README
  • Addressed all Copilot review feedback

Test Status

✅ All tests passing
✅ Lint checks passing

Related

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI and others added 3 commits November 17, 2025 08:14
Addresses code review feedback by expanding test_required_fields_basic
to verify that required fields (tags, doc_uuid, project_id) are added
consistently across all document types (adr, rfc, memo, prd, generic).

Previously the test only verified a single case. Now it tests multiple
document types in a loop to ensure the function behavior is consistent
regardless of document type, as the original comment suggested.

Co-authored-by: jrepp <[email protected]>
Address feedback from PR #34 code review
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 17, 2025 10:20
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances template tests and addresses code review feedback by improving test coverage and removing unnecessary code elements.

  • Expanded test_required_fields_basic to validate required fields across all document types
  • Removed unused doc_type parameter from ensure_required_fields() function
  • Removed hardcoded test count badge from README

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.65%. Comparing base (e5e6b47) to head (413dc92).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #39   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.65%   61.65%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        2929     2929           
  Branches      541      541           
=======================================
  Hits         1806     1806           
  Misses       1062     1062           
  Partials       61       61           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 61.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e5e6b47...413dc92. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jrepp
Copy link
Owner Author

jrepp commented Nov 17, 2025

Status Update ✅

All CI checks passing:

  • ✅ lint (13s)
  • ✅ build (9s)
  • ✅ actionlint (8s)
  • ✅ All tests passing on Python 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13

Coverage: 61.65% (maintained, no regression)

Copilot Review: No issues raised - clean review summary provided

Changes Included:

  1. Expanded test_required_fields_basic to test all document types
  2. Removed unused doc_type parameter from ensure_required_fields()
  3. Removed hardcoded test count badge from README

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Ready for merge!

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@jrepp jrepp merged commit 05392f7 into main Nov 17, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants