Skip to content

test: e2e workflow validation#22

Closed
jrenaldi79 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
test/e2e-workflow-trigger
Closed

test: e2e workflow validation#22
jrenaldi79 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
test/e2e-workflow-trigger

Conversation

@jrenaldi79
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Minor version comment added to .github/codex-audit-agents.md to trigger all four CI jobs

Purpose

E2E validation that the full review pipeline fires:

  1. auto-review (Claude PR review)
  2. security-review (Claude security scan)
  3. codex-audit (Codex audits Claude's review)
  4. claude-assist (should be skipped, no @claude mention)

Test plan

  • auto-review job starts and completes
  • security-review job starts and completes
  • codex-audit job fires after auto-review, posts @codex review
  • claude-assist job is skipped (no trigger)
  • Codex app picks up the comment and posts audit review

Minor version comment to trigger all four CI jobs for e2e validation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.

@jrenaldi79
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

The AGENTS.md override approach doesn't work because Codex reads
from the repo, not the CI workspace. Move audit-scoped instructions
directly into the @codex review comment body. Remove the checkout
and file copy steps since they're no longer needed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
@jrenaldi79
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review — You are an auditor of the Claude Code review above, not a fresh reviewer. For each finding: confirm if valid, flag false positives with reasoning, and identify meaningful gaps (security, logic, edge cases). Do not nitpick style, formatting, or naming. Only comment when you have substantive input.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@jrenaldi79 jrenaldi79 closed this Mar 25, 2026
@jrenaldi79 jrenaldi79 deleted the test/e2e-workflow-trigger branch March 25, 2026 23:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant