Skip to content

Conversation

@basil
Copy link
Member

@basil basil commented Apr 26, 2021

A subset of #213 that is hopefully non-controversial and safe to land in the short term because it does not involve Caffeine or shading.

Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems OK though I am unsure of the policy for inlining APL code into what is otherwise a BSD-2-Clause module. I would be inclined to just rewrite this one usage as I suspect that given the Javadoc any competent Java programmer could reimplement it (and we presumably do not even need all of it, like remove and IllegalArgumentException, just the very basic functionality).

@basil
Copy link
Member Author

basil commented Apr 26, 2021

I really don't think this is an issue, but if someone wants to reimplement this then feel free.

@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented Apr 26, 2021

FYI @jtnord

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented May 6, 2021

As long as the license header is kept intact it would be ok I expect?

@jglick jglick merged commit d19d6e3 into jenkinsci:master May 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants