Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding Hyrums Law #212

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

adding Hyrums Law #212

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

dret
Copy link
Contributor

@dret dret commented Feb 17, 2025

Part of addressing #209

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Build Successful! You can find a link to the downloadable artifacts below.

Name Link
Commit 78d8348
Logs https://github.com/isaqb-org/glossary/actions/runs/13399032219
Download https://github.com/isaqb-org/glossary/suites/34557278851/artifacts/2611799252

@sippsack
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your proposal, @dret.

I'm not sure about the youtube video reference. Is there also an article/paper from Hyrum we can reference?

What do the others think?

// tag::DE[]
==== Hyrums Law

Hyrums Law (benannt nach dem Google-Ingenieur Hyrum Wright) besagt, dass bei einer ausreichend großen Anzahl von Nutzern irgendjemand von jedem beobachtbare Verhalten einer Schnittstelle abhängen wird.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*beobachtbaren

@gernotstarke
Copy link
Member

I don't see that relevant, as the rule is not mentioned in the Foundation curriculum. Therefore, I don't want to care about it. It's a nice mention during the trainings, though.

@dret
Copy link
Contributor Author

dret commented Feb 18, 2025

I don't see that relevant, as the rule is not mentioned in the Foundation curriculum. Therefore, I don't want to care about it. It's a nice mention during the trainings, though.

It will be part of the API module for sure, so it would be nice to have it included in the glossary.

@gernotstarke
Copy link
Member

Ola Erik, we are currently discussing wether to restrict the Glossary to Foundation-terms, as NO other advanced group has ever actively participated in its creation and maintenance... and for the Foundation it is highly useful for exam preparation (which is not relevant for Advanced).

@dret
Copy link
Contributor Author

dret commented Feb 18, 2025 via email

@gernotstarke
Copy link
Member

I believe Eriks thesis that everybody should know this rule... (although I've never heard of it).

Glossary entries contain no risks, therefore it might be better to have more

@gernotstarke gernotstarke merged commit be07aab into main Mar 3, 2025
1 check passed
@gernotstarke gernotstarke deleted the dret-hyrums-law branch March 3, 2025 05:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done / Implemented
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants