Skip to content

unit-testcase execution in pipeline #383

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

alanjino
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
Server-Side Request Forgery Analyzer 0 findings
IDOR Analyzer 0 findings
SQL Injection Analyzer 0 findings
Secrets Analyzer 0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

The code changes in this pull request span several files, primarily related to GitHub Actions workflows and the configuration of the Kuberhealthy service. From an application security perspective, the key points to highlight are:

  1. GitHub Actions Workflows: The changes to the .github/workflows/agent-container-pr.yml and .github/workflows/agent-kubviz-pr.yml files focus on building and pushing Docker images for the container agent and the "kubviz-agent" component. The use of the GITHUB_TOKEN secret as a build argument is a security-sensitive aspect that should be carefully reviewed to ensure the token is not exposed.

  2. Kuberhealthy Configuration: The changes to the agent/config/config.go file introduce default values for the KuberhealthyURL and PollInterval fields. While this can be a convenient feature, it's important to ensure that the default values do not introduce any security or functional issues, and that the configuration is easily customizable for different environments.

  3. Test Coverage: The changes to the agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go file remove a test case that was checking the error handling for command execution. This could potentially leave a gap in the test coverage, and it's important to ensure that the application can handle unexpected command execution errors gracefully.

Files Changed:

  1. .github/workflows/agent-container-pr.yml:

    • Removes an empty line at the end of the file.
    • Uses the GITHUB_TOKEN secret as a build argument for the Docker image.
  2. agent/config/config.go:

    • Introduces default values for the KuberhealthyURL and PollInterval fields in the KHConfig struct.
  3. agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go:

    • Removes a test case that was checking the error handling for command execution.
  4. .github/workflows/agent-kubviz-pr.yml:

    • Builds and pushes a Docker image for the "kubviz-agent" component.
    • Runs tests and generates a coverage report, with a 60% coverage threshold.
    • Uploads the coverage report as an artifact.
    • Uses the GITHUB_TOKEN secret as a build argument for the Docker image.

Powered by DryRun Security

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant