-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add argument assertion on staking slashing #157
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new constant, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant StakingModule
User->>StakingModule: Request slashing operation
StakingModule->>StakingModule: Check fraction validity
alt Valid fraction
StakingModule->>StakingModule: Process slashing
else Invalid fraction
StakingModule-->>User: Return error (EINVALID_SLASH_FRACTION)
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (1)
183-184
: Fix typo in error constant nameThe error constant name has a typo: "FRACHTION" should be "FRACTION".
- const EINVALID_SLASH_FRACHTION: u64 = 17; + const EINVALID_SLASH_FRACTION: u64 = 17;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (1)
627-628
: LGTM! Good validation of slashing fraction
The assertion correctly validates that the slashing fraction is less than or equal to one, which is a critical check to prevent invalid slashing operations that could harm the staking system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small typo exists. LGTM
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes