fix: test function for compatibility #119
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve substantial updates across multiple modules within the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
beer-1
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1)
41-42: Approved changes toemit_writeset_block_eventThe modifications to
emit_writeset_block_eventeffectively transform it from a no-operation to an active function that updates the block information. This is consistent with the module's functionality and enhances its utility in test scenarios.The changes are approved.
Ensure that this function is used appropriately in test environments and does not affect production systems inadvertently.
Verification successful
Function
emit_writeset_block_eventis not used in non-test filesThe search results confirm that
emit_writeset_block_eventis not invoked outside of test files, ensuring it does not inadvertently affect production systems. The function is defined but not used in non-test contexts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `emit_writeset_block_event`. # Test: Search for the function usage in non-test files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type move --glob '!*test*' 'emit_writeset_block_event'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `emit_writeset_block_event`. # Test: Search for the function usage in all files and manually filter out test files. rg 'emit_writeset_block_event' --glob '!**/test/**'Length of output: 240
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1)
41-42: Approved changes toemit_writeset_block_eventThe modifications to
emit_writeset_block_eventeffectively transform it from a no-operation to an active function that updates the block information. This is consistent with the module's functionality and enhances its utility in test scenarios.The changes are approved.
Ensure that this function is used appropriately in test environments and does not affect production systems inadvertently.
Verification successful
Function
emit_writeset_block_eventis not used in non-test filesThe function
emit_writeset_block_eventis defined but not used in any non-test files, ensuring it does not affect production systems inadvertently. This confirms its appropriate usage context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `emit_writeset_block_event`. # Test: Search for the function usage in non-test files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type move --glob '!*test*' 'emit_writeset_block_event'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `emit_writeset_block_event`. # Test: Search for the function usage in non-test files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --glob '!**/test/**' 'emit_writeset_block_event'Length of output: 240
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (74)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/account.move (15 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/address.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/any.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/code.move (12 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/coin.move (17 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/comparator.move (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/compatibility/aptos_coin.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/copyable_any.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (16 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/ed25519.move (5 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (7 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/debug.move (10 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move (8 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal256.move (8 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (103 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/event.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/dispatchable_fungible_asset.move (6 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move (54 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/primary_fungible_store.move (26 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/from_bcs.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/hex.move (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/keccak.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/managed_coin.move (13 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/math128.move (7 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/math64.move (5 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move (159 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/multisig.move (52 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (27 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object_code_deployment.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/oracle.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/query.move (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/simple_map.move (12 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/stableswap.move (78 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (134 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/string_utils.move (6 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/table.move (5 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (26 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move (29 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (27 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/property_map.move (20 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/royalty.move (6 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/simple_nft.move (26 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move (38 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/type_info.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/deflation_token.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/deflation_token_tests.move (9 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/nil_op_token.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/nil_op_token_tests.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/permissioned_token.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/permissioned_token_tests.move (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/reentrant_token.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/reentrant_token_tests.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token_fa_tests.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token_pfs_tests.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ten_x_token.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ten_x_token_tests.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/account.move (15 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/address.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/any.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/code.move (12 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/coin.move (17 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/comparator.move (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/compatibility/aptos_coin.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/copyable_any.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (16 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/ed25519.move (5 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (71)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/account.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/address.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/any.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/code.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/coin.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/comparator.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/compatibility/aptos_coin.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/copyable_any.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/ed25519.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/debug.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal256.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/event.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/dispatchable_fungible_asset.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/primary_fungible_store.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/from_bcs.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/hex.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/keccak.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/managed_coin.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/math128.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/math64.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/multisig.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object_code_deployment.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/oracle.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/query.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/simple_map.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/stableswap.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/string_utils.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/table.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/property_map.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/royalty.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/simple_nft.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/type_info.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/deflation_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/deflation_token_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/nil_op_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/nil_op_token_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/permissioned_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/permissioned_token_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/reentrant_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/reentrant_token_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token_fa_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/simple_dispatchable_token_pfs_tests.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ten_x_token.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ten_x_token_tests.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/account.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/address.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/any.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/code.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/coin.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/comparator.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/compatibility/aptos_coin.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/copyable_any.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/ed25519.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move
Additional comments not posted (14)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (14)
16-16: LGTM!The
Decimal256import is necessary for the changes in return types fromDecimal128toDecimal256.The code changes are approved.
22-22: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
27-27: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
32-32: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
38-38: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
45-45: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
53-53: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
61-61: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
68-68: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
227-227: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
236-236: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
249-250: LGTM!Changing the return type to
Decimal256allows for more precise representation of decimal values. Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.The code changes are approved.
276-277: LGTM!Changing the return type to
Decimal256allows for more precise representation of decimal values. Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.The code changes are approved.
321-322: LGTM!Removing the trailing comma enhances the syntactical correctness and consistency of the code.
The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (133 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- crates/natives/src/transaction_context.rs (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (3)
19-25: LGTM!The function correctly sets the transaction hash with proper validation.
28-28: LGTM!The native function is correctly implemented.
83-89: LGTM!The test function correctly sets and verifies the transaction hash.
crates/natives/src/transaction_context.rs (2)
110-127: LGTM!The function correctly sets the transaction hash with proper validation and safety checks.
146-155: LGTM!The
nativesarray is correctly updated to include the new function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (98 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move (54 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (8 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move (159 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (133 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
Additional comments not posted (5)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (2)
81-91: Review: New test functiontest_get_transaction_hashThis test function appears to correctly set and then retrieve a transaction hash to verify its correctness. The use of a hardcoded hash for testing is acceptable in this context, assuming it's part of a controlled test environment.
However, ensure that the test covers various edge cases, such as setting a hash of incorrect length, to fully validate the robustness of the
set_transaction_hashfunction. It might also be beneficial to include tests for the failure assertions of the main function.
19-24: Review: New functionset_transaction_hashThis function correctly asserts that the transaction hash length is exactly 32 bytes, which is a standard requirement for transaction hashes. The use of
vector::lengthto enforce this constraint is appropriate. The function then delegates the setting of the transaction hash to an internal function, which is a good separation of concerns.However, it's important to ensure that
set_transaction_hash_internalis properly implemented and secured since it's marked as native and its implementation details are not visible here. Additionally, consider adding more detailed error messages for the assertion to aid debugging.Verification successful
Verification of
set_transaction_hash_internalImplementationThe native function
set_transaction_hash_internalis implemented in Rust asnative_test_only_set_transaction_hash. It correctly sets the transaction hash in theNativeTransactionContext. The implementation appears to be secure, but ensure that the conversion withtry_into().unwrap()is safe for all expected inputs.
- File:
crates/natives/src/transaction_context.rs- Function:
native_test_only_set_transaction_hashScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `set_transaction_hash_internal`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper implementation details. ast-grep --lang move --pattern $'native fun set_transaction_hash_internal($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for references to `set_transaction_hash_internal` in the codebase. rg 'set_transaction_hash_internal'Length of output: 653
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation or related logic of `set_transaction_hash_internal` in the Rust file. rg 'set_transaction_hash_internal' crates/natives/src/transaction_context.rs -A 10Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of `native_test_only_set_transaction_hash` in the Rust file. rg 'native_test_only_set_transaction_hash' crates/natives/src/transaction_context.rs -A 20Length of output: 833
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (3)
35-40: Review: New functionsubfor subtractionThe function
subcorrectly checks that the result of the subtraction is not negative by assertingx_raw >= y_rawbefore performing the subtraction. This is crucial for preventing underflow in fixed-point arithmetic. The use of raw values for the operation followed by the creation of a newFixedPoint64instance from the result is a clean and efficient approach.However, the error code
ENEGATIVE_RESULTshould be documented to explain its meaning clearly in the context of this function. Additionally, consider adding more comprehensive tests to cover cases near the boundary conditions.
49-55: Review: New functionaddfor additionThe function
addcorrectly handles potential overflow by casting the operands tou256before addition and then asserting that the result does not exceedMAX_U128. This is a good practice to ensure that the addition does not result in an overflow, which can be a common issue in fixed-point arithmetic.The implementation is straightforward and follows best practices for handling large number arithmetic in a type-safe manner. Ensure that the function is accompanied by adequate tests to verify its behavior under various scenarios, especially near the maximum allowable value.
235-237: Review: Comparison functionsless_or_equalandlessThe functions
less_or_equalandlessare implemented correctly, using straightforward comparisons of thevaluefields ofFixedPoint64instances. These functions are essential for enabling logical comparisons between fixed-point numbers, which are critical for decision-making processes in financial calculations.Ensure that these functions are tested thoroughly to confirm their accuracy across the full range of possible fixed-point values.
Also applies to: 245-247
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (1)
80-89: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Consider adding an additional test case to verify the behavior when an invalid transaction hash (length != 32 bytes) is provided. This will ensure that the assertion in
set_transaction_hashfunction is working as expected.#[test] #[expected_failure(abort_code = 100)] fun test_set_transaction_hash_invalid_length() { set_transaction_hash(x"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001FF"); }precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal256.move (1)
54-56: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (19)
- api/bindings.h (1 hunks)
- api/callbacks.go (6 hunks)
- api/callbacks_cgo.go (2 hunks)
- api/mocks.go (6 hunks)
- crates/compiler/src/mocks.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/test_utils/mock_chain.rs (6 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/common.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/staking.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/natives/src/staking.rs (15 hunks)
- crates/types/src/staking_change_set.rs (2 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- libmovevm/bindings.h (1 hunks)
- libmovevm/src/api.rs (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move (10 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal256.move (10 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (8 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (119 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (93)
go.mod (3)
6-6: LGTM!The addition of the
cosmossdk.io/mathdependency with versionv1.3.0is approved. It aligns with the PR objectives and follows the best practice of specifying the version constraint.
34-34: LGTM!The update of the
golang.org/x/expdependency to commit47842c84f3dbis approved. It aligns with the PR objectives and follows the best practice of specifying the version as a specific commit for reproducibility.
35-35: LGTM!The update of the
golang.org/x/sysdependency to versionv0.1.0is approved. It aligns with the PR objectives and follows the best practice of specifying the version constraint.crates/types/src/staking_change_set.rs (5)
26-26: LGTM!The tuple type change from
(u64, u64)to(u64, String)is consistent with theundelegationfield type change in theStakingDeltastruct.
33-33: LGTM!The
newfunction signature change is consistent with the tuple type change in theStakingChangeSetstruct.
37-37: LGTM!The
changesfunction signature change is consistent with the tuple type change in theStakingChangeSetstruct.
45-45: LGTM!The closure parameter type change is consistent with the tuple type change in the
StakingChangeSetstruct.
15-15: Verify the impact of changing theundelegationfield type fromu64toString.Changing the
undelegationfield type fromu64toStringis a significant change that can impact the entire codebase. While usingStringprovides more flexibility, it can lead to parsing and validation issues if not handled properly.Please run the following script to verify the usage of the
undelegationfield across the codebase and ensure proper validation is in place:crates/compiler/src/mocks.rs (2)
88-90: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The parameter type of
_shareinshare_to_amounthas been changed fromu64toString. Ensure that all callers of this function are passing aStringargument now.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Verification successful: Parameter type change is consistent.
The parameter type of
_sharein theshare_to_amountfunction has been changed fromu64toString, and all callers are passing aStringargument as expected. No issues were found with this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all callers of `share_to_amount` are passing a `String` argument. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Callers should pass `String` argument. rg --type rust -A 5 $'share_to_amount'Length of output: 6389
80-82: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The return type of
validator_to_amounthas been changed fromanyhow::Result<u64>toanyhow::Result<String>. Ensure that all callers of this function are expecting aStringresult now.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/transaction_context.move (2)
19-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
25-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/common.rs (2)
7-7: LGTM!The change in the
StakingDeltatype definition is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the context. The change fromu64toStringfor the second element of the inner tuple suggests that more descriptive or varied data is now associated with staking changes. The change appears to be intentional and does not introduce any obvious issues.
69-69: LGTM!The change in the
StakingChangevariant of theExpectedOutputItemenum is consistent with the change in theStakingDeltatype definition. The type of the value in the innerBTreeMaphas been updated to match the modifiedStakingDeltatype. The change appears to be intentional and does not introduce any obvious issues.api/callbacks_cgo.go (2)
16-16: Verify the function usage and ensure proper documentation.The function signature change for
cShareToAmountis significant as it now expects a different format for the input share value by usingU8SliceViewfor theshareparameter. This may enhance the function's flexibility or compatibility with other parts of the codebase.Please verify that all calls to this function have been updated to pass the share value in the expected format. Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Also, ensure that this change is properly documented, including:
- Updating the function documentation comment to reflect the new behavior and expected input format.
- Updating any relevant documentation or design docs that mention this function.
- Communicating this change to the team and any users of this API.
Verification successful
Function usage is consistent with the new signature.
The function
cShareToAmounthas been updated to useU8SliceViewfor theshareparameter, and this change is consistently reflected in its usage across the codebase. The wrapper functioncShareToAmount_cgocorrectly callscShareToAmountwith the updated signature. Ensure that this change is documented and communicated to the team and any users of this API.
- Update the function documentation comment to reflect the new behavior and expected input format.
- Update any relevant documentation or design docs that mention this function.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `cShareToAmount` pass the share value in the expected format. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'cShareToAmount'Length of output: 2679
15-15: Verify the function usage and ensure proper documentation.The function signature change for
cAmountToShareis significant as it alters the expected output behavior by usingUnmanagedVectorfor theshareparameter. This allows for more complex or varied data structures to be returned.Please verify that all calls to this function have been updated to handle the new return type. Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Also, ensure that this change is properly documented, including:
- Updating the function documentation comment to reflect the new behavior.
- Updating any relevant documentation or design docs that mention this function.
- Communicating this change to the team and any users of this API.
Verification successful
Function usage updated and documented.
The function
cAmountToSharehas been updated to useUnmanagedVectorfor theshareparameter, and its usage in the codebase has been updated accordingly. The function calls inapi/callbacks.goandapi/callbacks_cgo.goreflect the new signature. Ensure that this change is documented in the function's documentation comment and any relevant design documents. Communicate this change to the team and any users of this API.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `cAmountToShare` handle the new return type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'cAmountToShare'Length of output: 2979
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/staking.rs (1)
210-210: Verify the impact of the data type change.The change in data type from
u64toStringis approved. However, please verify if this change has any impact on the subsequent processing or validation that relies on the original numeric format.Run the following script to verify the impact of the data type change:
api/mocks.go (7)
6-6: LGTM!The import statement is approved.
126-128: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
130-132: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
167-167: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
182-189: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
191-203: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
205-217: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
api/bindings.h (2)
206-206: Verify the parameter type changes and their impact.The parameter types of the
unbond_timestampfunction have been changed as follows:
- 1st parameter:
uint64_t*→UnmanagedVector*- 2nd parameter:
UnmanagedVector*→UnmanagedVector*These are significant changes that need to be verified.
Please run the following script to verify the changes and their impact on the codebase:
201-201: Verify the parameter type change and its impact.The 4th parameter type of the
share_to_amountfunction has been changed fromuint64_ttoU8SliceView. This is a significant change that needs to be verified.Please run the following script to verify the change and its impact on the codebase:
libmovevm/src/api.rs (4)
45-45: LGTM!The change to the
shareparameter in theamount_to_sharefunction, from a mutable pointer to au64to a mutable pointer to anUnmanagedVector, is approved. This change allows for handling more complex data structures for the share data.
52-52: LGTM!The change to the
shareparameter in theshare_to_amountfunction, from au64to aU8SliceView, is approved. This change aligns with the modifications made in theamount_to_sharefunction, ensuring a consistent approach to handling share data as strings across both functions.
129-129: LGTM!The following changes in the
amount_to_sharefunction are approved:
- The return type has been changed from
anyhow::Result<u64>toanyhow::Result<String>, indicating that the function now returns a string representation of the share instead of a numeric value.- A new variable
shareof typeUnmanagedVectoris introduced and consumed to produce the final string output.These changes are implemented correctly and align with the overall shift in the API's design to emphasize the use of string representations for shares.
Also applies to: 135-135, 143-143, 148-149, 158-158
165-165: LGTM!The following changes in the
share_to_amountfunction are approved:
- The
shareparameter has been changed from au64to aString, aligning with the modifications made in theamount_to_sharefunction and ensuring a consistent approach to handling share data as strings across both functions.- The
shareparameter is converted to aU8SliceViewfor further processing.These changes are implemented correctly and contribute to the overall consistency in the API's design.
Also applies to: 174-175
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/test_utils/mock_chain.rs (4)
1-7: LGTM!The imports are necessary for the changes made in the file to support string inputs and outputs for share and amount values.
Line range hint
271-280: LGTM!The changes to the
amount_to_shareandshare_to_amountmethods in theStakingAPItrait implementation forMockAPIare consistent with the updated method signatures in the trait declaration.
Line range hint
397-419: LGTM!The changes to the
amount_to_shareandshare_to_amountmethods in theMockStakingAPIimplementation enhance the precision of the arithmetic operations by usingBigDecimaland support string inputs and outputs for share and amount values.
577-585: LGTM!The changes to the
amount_to_shareandshare_to_amountmethods in theStakingAPItrait implementation forBlankStakingAPIImplare consistent with the updated method signatures in the trait declaration.crates/natives/src/staking.rs (11)
1-9: LGTM!The new imports are necessary to support the changes made in the file.
16-16: LGTM!The import is necessary to support the changes made in the
into_change_setmethod.
71-72: LGTM!The change to use
BigDecimalfor theundelegationfield allows for more precise handling of decimal values.
97-112: LGTM!The conversion from
BigDecimaltoStringfor theundelegationfield is necessary to match the expected type in theStakingChangeSetstruct.
172-177: LGTM!Using
BigDecimal::zero()for the initialundelegationvalue is consistent with the updated type of theundelegationfield in theStakingDatastruct.
Line range hint
185-198: LGTM!The conversion from
StringtoBigDecimaland then toDecimal128is necessary to handle thesharevalue as a string representation of a decimal value and return the expectedDecimal128struct.
Line range hint
211-261: LGTM!The changes in the
native_undelegatefunction are consistent with the updated types and handling of decimal values usingBigDecimal. The conversions betweenDecimal128,BigDecimal, andStringare necessary to match the expected types in different parts of the code.
Line range hint
282-309: LGTM!The changes in the
native_share_to_amountfunction are consistent with the updated types and handling of decimal values usingBigDecimal. The conversions betweenDecimal128,BigDecimal, andStringare necessary to match the expected types in different parts of the code.
Line range hint
341-354: LGTM!The conversion from
StringtoBigDecimaland then toDecimal128is necessary to handle thesharevalue as a string representation of a decimal value and return the expectedDecimal128struct.
407-439: LGTM!The new helper functions provide a centralized and reusable way to perform conversions between
String,BigDecimal, andDecimal128types, which is necessary to support the code changes made in the file.
37-44: Verify the usage of the updatedstakeandamount_to_sharemethods in the codebase.Ensure that all calls to these methods have been updated to match the new function signatures.
Run the following script to verify the usage:
api/callbacks.go (4)
Line range hint
405-436: LGTM!The changes in the
cAmountToSharefunction are consistent with the updated function signature ofamount_to_share_fn:
- The
shareparameter is now of typeUnmanagedVector *instead ofuint64_t *.- The result is correctly assigned to
shareusingnewUnmanagedVector([]byte(s)).
Line range hint
441-466: LGTM!The changes in the
cShareToAmountfunction are consistent with the updated function signature ofshare_to_amount_fn:
- The
shareparameter is now of typeU8SliceViewinstead ofuint64_t.- The
shareparameter is correctly copied to a byte slice usingcopyU8Slice(share).
18-18: Verify the function implementation and usage.The function signature of
share_to_amount_fnhas been changed:
- The
shareparameter type is changed fromuint64_ttoU8SliceView, indicating that the function now accepts a byte slice instead of a uint64.Please ensure that:
- The function implementation has been updated to handle the new parameter type.
- All usages of the function have been updated to pass the correct parameter type.
17-17: Verify the function implementation and usage.The function signature of
amount_to_share_fnhas been changed:
- The
shareparameter type is changed fromuint64_t *toUnmanagedVector *, indicating that the function now returns a more complex data type, likely a byte slice, instead of a uint64.Please ensure that:
- The function implementation has been updated to return the correct data type.
- All usages of the function have been updated to handle the new return type.
Verification successful
Implementation and usage of
amount_to_share_fnverified.The function
cAmountToShareinapi/callbacks.gocorrectly handles theUnmanagedVectortype, andamount_to_shareis used in a mock setup inapi/mocks.go. These findings suggest that the changes to the function signature have been implemented and tested appropriately. No further issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `amount_to_share_fn`. # Test 1: Search for the function definition. Expect: Updated function signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'amount_to_share_fn' # Test 2: Search for the function usage. Expect: Updated function calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'amount_to_share_fn'Length of output: 2385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of `cAmountToShare_cgo` and references to `amount_to_share`. # Test 1: Search for the implementation of `cAmountToShare_cgo`. rg --type go -A 5 $'cAmountToShare_cgo' # Test 2: Search for all references to `amount_to_share` in the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 $'amount_to_share'Length of output: 3469
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of `cAmountToShare` and related test cases. # Test 1: Search for the implementation of `cAmountToShare`. rg --type go -A 5 $'cAmountToShare' # Test 2: Search for test cases related to `amount_to_share`. rg --type go -A 5 $'amount_to_share'Length of output: 4731
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (12)
35-40: LGTM!The
subfunction and its specification look good:
- The function correctly subtracts two
FixedPoint64values.- The assertion prevents negative results.
- The specification clearly defines the behavior and constraints.
Also applies to: 42-46
49-55: LGTM!The
addfunction and its specification look good:
- The function correctly adds two
FixedPoint64values.- The assertion prevents overflow by ensuring the result does not exceed
MAX_U128.- The specification clearly defines the behavior and constraints.
Also applies to: 57-61
146-146: LGTM!The changes to
create_from_rationallook good:
- The new assertion at line 146 prevents creating a zero value from a non-zero numerator, which is an important invariant.
- The increased verification duration estimate at line 155 is justified given the complexity of the function.
Also applies to: 155-155
172-174: LGTM!The updated formula in
spec_create_from_rationallooks correct and matches the implementation increate_from_rational.
191-192: LGTM!Making
get_raw_valuepublic is a good change as it allows external code to access the rawu128value of aFixedPoint64.
196-197: LGTM!The new
is_zerofunction is correctly implemented by comparing the raw value to zero.
235-237: LGTM!The new comparison functions
less_or_equal,less,greater_or_equal,greater,equal, andalmost_equallook good:
- They are correctly implemented by comparing the raw values of the
FixedPoint64arguments.- They have clear specifications that define their behavior.
- They provide a comprehensive set of comparison operations for
FixedPoint64values.Also applies to: 250-252, 265-267, 280-282, 295-297, 310-318
358-359: LGTM!The changes to
floorlook good:
- The simplified implementation at line range 358-359 is correct and more efficient.
- The updated specification at line 365 ensures the result matches the
spec_floorfunction.Also applies to: 365-365
378-386: LGTM!The changes to
ceillook good:
- The updated implementation at line range 378-386 is correct, more efficient, and handles the case when the value is already an integer.
- The increased verification duration estimate at line range 388-389 is justified given the complexity of the function.
- The updated specification at line 392 ensures the result matches the
spec_ceilfunction.Also applies to: 388-389, 392-392
406-413: LGTM!The changes to
roundlook good:
- The updated implementation at line range 406-413 is correct and more readable by using the
floorandceilfunctions.- The updated specification at line 419 ensures the result matches the
spec_roundfunction.Also applies to: 419-419
442-453: LGTM!The new
test_subfunction is a good addition:
- It tests the
subfunction by subtracting two rational numbers and comparing the result to the expected value.- It uses the
assert_approx_the_samefunction to compare the result with the expected value up to a certain precision, which is a good practice for comparing floating-point values.
457-461: LGTM!The new
test_sub_should_abortfunction is a good addition:
- It tests that the
subfunction aborts when the result would be negative.- It uses the
#[expected_failure]attribute to expect an abort with the specific abort code0x10006and locationSelf, which ensures that the function aborts with the correct abort code and location.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move (15)
51-54: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
56-58: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-62: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
64-66: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
68-70: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
72-74: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
76-78: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
80-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
142-144: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
146-148: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
260-277: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
287-486: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
496-695: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
194-201: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
213-220: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal256.move (11)
64-66: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
68-70: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
72-74: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
76-78: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
80-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
84-86: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
88-90: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
92-94: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
175-177: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
179-181: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
183-185: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (6)
21-21: Formatting adjustment. LGTM!The removal of the trailing comma is a formatting change and does not affect the functionality.
27-28: Improved precision for financial calculations. LGTM!The transition from
u128toDecimal128fortotal_shareandunbonding_sharefields is a significant improvement. It enhances precision in financial calculations, which is crucial for staking mechanisms involving fractional values. This change helps prevent issues related to rounding errors that could arise with integer types.
33-33: Formatting adjustment. LGTM!The removal of the trailing comma is a formatting change and does not affect the functionality.
40-41: Consistent transition to Decimal128 for improved precision. LGTM!The change from
u64toDecimal128forshareandreward_indexfields in theDelegationstruct is consistent with the overall transition to usingDecimal128for improved precision in financial calculations. This change enhances the accuracy of delegation-related values, ensuring precise tracking of shares and reward indexes.
58-58: Formatting adjustment. LGTM!The removal of the trailing comma is a formatting change and does not affect the functionality.
66-66: Formatting adjustment. LGTM!The removal of the trailing comma is a formatting change and does not affect the functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (1)
170-170: LGTM!The addition of the
verify_duration_estimatepragma is approved.Remove the comment once the timeout issue is resolved.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (8 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (18)
31-32: LGTM!The addition of the
ENEGATIVE_RESULTconstant is approved.
42-48: LGTM!The addition of the
subfunction is approved.
50-54: LGTM!The specification for the
subfunction is approved.
56-63: LGTM!The addition of the
addfunction is approved.
72-76: LGTM!The specification for the
addfunction is approved.
161-161: LGTM!The change to the assertion condition in the
create_from_rationalfunction is approved.
187-189: LGTM!The changes to the specification for the
spec_create_from_rationalfunction are approved.
249-252: LGTM!The addition of the
less_or_equalfunction is approved.
254-258: LGTM!The specification for the
less_or_equalfunction is approved.
260-262: LGTM!The specification for the
spec_less_or_equalfunction is approved.
264-267: LGTM!The addition of the
lessfunction is approved.
269-273: LGTM!The specification for the
lessfunction is approved.
275-277: LGTM!The specification for the
spec_lessfunction is approved.
279-282: LGTM!The addition of the
greater_or_equalfunction is approved.
284-288: LGTM!The specification for the
greater_or_equalfunction is approved.
290-292: LGTM!The specification for the
spec_greater_or_equalfunction is approved.
294-297: LGTM!The addition of the
greaterfunction is approved.
299-303: LGTM!The specification for the
greaterfunction is approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (118 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (10 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (15)
20-20: LGTM!The constant
MAX_U64is correctly declared with the appropriate value for the maximum unsigned 64-bit integer.
34-34: LGTM!The constant
ENEGATIVE_RESULTis correctly declared with a unique abort code value.
45-50: LGTM!The
subfunction is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid negative results.
- Clear specification defining the behavior and constraints.
- Correct logic for subtracting the raw values and creating a new
FixedPoint64value.Also applies to: 63-67
52-54: LGTM!The
sub_u64function is a simple wrapper aroundsub_u128to support subtractingu64values. The implementation is correct and the casting fromu64tou128is safe.
56-61: LGTM!The
sub_u128function is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid negative results.
- Correct logic for subtracting a
u128value from aFixedPoint64value usingu256values to avoid losing precision.
70-76: LGTM!The
addfunction is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid overflow.
- Clear specification defining the behavior and constraints.
- Correct logic for adding the raw values and creating a new
FixedPoint64value usingu256values to avoid overflow.Also applies to: 90-94
78-80: LGTM!The
add_u64function is a simple wrapper aroundadd_u128to support addingu64values. The implementation is correct and the casting fromu64tou128is safe.
82-88: LGTM!The
add_u128function is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid overflow.
- Correct logic for adding a
u128value to aFixedPoint64value usingu256values to avoid overflow.
96-102: LGTM!The
multiplyfunction is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid overflow.
- Correct logic for multiplying two
FixedPoint64values usingu256values and shifting the result right by 64 bits to maintain the fixed-point precision.
104-108: LGTM!The
multiply_u64function is a simple wrapper aroundmultiply_u128to support multiplyingu64values. The implementation is correct and the casting fromu64tou128is safe. The assertion ensures that the result is within the validu64range.
142-149: LGTM!The
dividefunction is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate assertions to avoid division by zero and overflow.
- Correct logic for dividing two
FixedPoint64values usingu256values and shifting the dividend left by 64 bits to maintain the fixed-point precision.
154-158: LGTM!The
divide_u64function is a simple wrapper arounddivide_u128to support dividingu64values. The implementation is correct and the casting fromu64tou128is safe. The assertion ensures that the result is within the validu64range.
300-302: LGTM!The
less_or_equalfunction is correctly implemented by comparing the raw values of theFixedPoint64instances. The accompanying specification clearly defines the behavior of the function.Also applies to: 304-312
315-317: LGTM!The
lessfunction is correctly implemented by comparing the raw values of theFixedPoint64instances. The accompanying specification clearly defines the behavior of the function.Also applies to: 319-327
330-332: LGTM!The
greater_or_equalfunction is correctly implemented by comparing the rawAlso applies to: 334-342
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (11 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (118 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
Additional comments not posted (20)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (20)
48-53: LGTM!The
subfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 66-70
55-57: LGTM!The
sub_u64function is correctly implemented by callingsub_u128.
59-64: LGTM!The
sub_u128function is correctly implemented and has an assertion to ensure the result is not negative.
73-79: LGTM!The
addfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 93-97
81-83: LGTM!The
add_u64function is correctly implemented by callingadd_u128.
85-91: LGTM!The
add_u128function is correctly implemented and has an assertion to ensure the result does not exceedMAX_U128.
99-105: LGTM!The
multiplyfunction is correctly implemented and has an assertion to ensure the result does not exceedMAX_U128.
107-111: LGTM!The
multiply_u64function is correctly implemented by callingmultiply_u128and has an assertion to ensure the result does not exceedMAX_U64.
145-152: LGTM!The
dividefunction is correctly implemented and has assertions to ensure the divisor is not zero and the result does not exceedMAX_U128.
157-161: LGTM!The
divide_u64function is correctly implemented by callingdivide_u128and has an assertion to ensure the result does not exceedMAX_U64.
315-317: LGTM!The
less_or_equalfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 319-323, 325-327
330-332: LGTM!The
lessfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 334-338, 340-342
345-347: LGTM!The
greater_or_equalfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 349-353, 355-357
360-362: LGTM!The
greaterfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 364-368, 370-372
375-377: LGTM!The
equalfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 379-383, 385-387
389-398: LGTM!The
almost_equalfunction is correctly implemented and has a matching specification.Also applies to: 400-404, 406-412
438-439: LGTM!The
floorfunction specification has been updated to use a new helper functionspec_floor, which improves readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 442-445, 448-455
458-465: LGTM!The
ceilfunction specification has been updated to use a new helper functionspec_ceil, which improves readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 468-472, 475-483
486-494: LGTM!The
roundfunction specification has been updated to use a new helper functionspec_round, which improves readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 496-499, 502-511
226-226: LGTM!The
create_from_rationalfunction specification has been updated to assert that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/decimal128.move
beer-1
force-pushed
the
feat/compatibility
branch
from
9c54ba2 to
6623a5c
Compare
* introduce big number libraries * remove decimal128 and decimal256 * update missing bcs update
beer-1
force-pushed
the
feat/compatibility
branch
from
7fcef20 to
a37d670
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/output.data/pack/sources/output_test.move (3)
25-26: Functionbigdecimal1correctly updated.The function has been updated to use
bigdecimal::BigDecimaland utilizesbigdecimal::from_ratio_u64for creating the value. Consider adding a comment explaining why the ratio123/100was chosen, to enhance clarity.
30-31: Functionbigdecimal2correctly updated.The function now returns
bigdecimal::BigDecimaland usesbigdecimal::from_ratio_u64for the value0.123. Adding a comment about the choice of ratio could improve understanding.
40-41: Functionbiguint2correctly updated.The function now uses
biguint::BigUintand the methodbiguint::from_u128for the very large number12312983219839218392183. Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of this large number.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/bigdecimal.move (1)
2-3: Discrepancy inerrorImport PathThe import path for
errorinbigdecimal.movedoes not match the module definition inerror.move. The module is defined asstd::error, but the import path isinitia_std::error. Please verify and correct the import path or update the module definition to ensure consistency.
error.move: Module defined asstd::errorbigdecimal.move: Import pathuse initia_std::error;The
biguintimport is verified as correct.Analysis chain
Imports Review
The imports are appropriate for the operations performed within the module. Ensure that these modules (
initia_std::errorandinitia_std::biguint) are correctly implemented and available.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and correctness of the imported modules. fd --type file --name "error.move" --exec cat {} fd --type file --name "biguint.move" --exec cat {}Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correctly verify the existence and correctness of the imported modules. fd 'error.move' --exec cat {} fd 'biguint.move' --exec cat {}Length of output: 25414
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/args.rs (1)
788-853: Add assertions to thebiguint_bigdecimaltest function.The
biguint_bigdecimalfunction currently lacks assertions to verify the expected outcomes of the operations it performs. To ensure that the test function effectively validates the correctness of handlingBigUintandBigDecimaltypes, it is crucial to include assertions that check the results against expected values.
- Add assertions to verify the correctness of operations involving
BigUintandBigDecimal.Analysis chain
Review the
biguint_bigdecimaltest function.This function is well-structured and effectively tests the handling of
BigUintandBigDecimaltypes within the Move framework. It includes comprehensive tests for both binary and JSON inputs, ensuring robust testing of serialization and deserialization capabilities.However, it is crucial to ensure that the expected outcomes of these tests are correctly asserted to verify the correctness of the operations. The function should include assertions to check the results of the operations against expected values to confirm that the types are handled correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the expected outcomes are correctly asserted in the `biguint_bigdecimal` function. # Test: Search for assertions in the function. Expect: Assertions that check the results against expected values. rg --type rust -A 5 $'biguint_bigdecimal'Length of output: 507
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (25)
- .cargo/config.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/compiler/src/extended_checks.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/args.data/pack/sources/hello.move (2 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/args.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/output.data/pack/sources/output_test.move (2 hunks)
- crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/output.rs (4 hunks)
- crates/gas/src/initia_stdlib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/json/src/json_to_move.rs (10 hunks)
- crates/json/src/json_to_value.rs (12 hunks)
- crates/json/src/move_to_json.rs (6 hunks)
- crates/natives/src/biguint.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/natives/src/lib.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/natives/src/staking.rs (15 hunks)
- crates/vm/src/verifier/transaction_arg_validation.rs (1 hunks)
- libmovevm/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- libmovevm/src/move_api/move_types.rs (10 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/bigdecimal.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/biguint.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (88 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (11 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move (152 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/stableswap.move (77 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (112 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (117)
.cargo/config.toml (1)
3-4: Verify the correctness and implications of environment variable settings.The environment variables
RUST_BIGDECIMAL_FMT_EXPONENTIAL_UPPER_THRESHOLDandRUST_BIGDECIMAL_FMT_EXPONENTIAL_LOWER_THRESHOLDare both set to "100". This raises a few points for verification:
- Value Consistency: Ensure that setting both thresholds to the same value is intentional and correct. Typically, upper and lower thresholds would differ to define a range.
- Value Type: Confirm whether these values should be strings or numeric types, as this could affect their interpretation by the system.
- Documentation: It would be beneficial to add comments explaining the purpose and effect of these variables, especially for future maintainability and clarity for other developers.
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/output.data/pack/sources/output_test.move (2)
5-6: Imports are correctly updated.The new imports for
biguintandbigdecimalare necessary for the updated functions and are correctly placed.
35-36: Functionbiguint1correctly updated.The function now uses
biguint::BigUintand the methodfrom_u64to create the value123. This change aligns with the PR's objectives to handle larger numerical values.libmovevm/Cargo.toml (1)
27-27: Verify the necessity and integration of the newbigdecimaldependency.The addition of
bigdecimalto the project's dependencies suggests a move towards handling precise decimal arithmetic. Please ensure that:
- The dependency is indeed necessary for the project's goals.
- It integrates well with the existing codebase without introducing compatibility issues, especially in relation to the PR's focus on test function compatibility.
- Consider the impact on the project's build size and compile time.
Verification successful
The
bigdecimaldependency is well-integrated and justified.The
bigdecimaldependency is used across multiple files and modules in the project, indicating its necessity and integration. Its presence in test files suggests relevance to the PR's focus on test function compatibility. No issues were found regarding its addition.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of `bigdecimal` in the project's Rust files. # Test: Search for `bigdecimal` usage in Rust files. Expect: At least one usage instance. rg --type rust 'bigdecimal' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 467
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move (3)
29-29: Approved import changes forBigUintandBigDecimal.The new imports are necessary for the updated types in the
TestObjectstruct.Also applies to: 32-32
44-45: Approved changes toTestObjectstruct.The addition of
biguintandbigdecimalfields aligns with the PR's objective to enhance compatibility. Ensure that these changes are reflected correctly in both serialization and deserialization processes.
52-52: Verify relevance of changes toTestObject2.The modification in the
TestObject2struct appears unrelated to the main changes. Confirm if this change is intended and relevant to the PR's objectives.crates/natives/src/lib.rs (2)
11-11: Approve the public declaration of thebiguintmodule.Ensure that the
biguintmodule is properly implemented and documented to match its public accessibility.Please verify the implementation and documentation of the
biguintmodule to ensure it meets the standards expected for a publicly accessible module.
82-82: Approve the integration of thebiguintmodule into native functions.Ensure that the native functions provided by the
biguintmodule are correctly implemented and integrate seamlessly with the existing architecture.Please verify the correctness and integration of the native functions from the
biguintmodule to ensure they function as expected within the library's ecosystem.crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/output.rs (1)
88-88: Review of Modified Test Cases for Big Number HandlingThe changes to the test cases from decimal to big number handling are as follows:
test_decimaltotest_bigdecimal1(line 88): The test case name and expected output have been updated to reflect the use of big decimals. The expected output"1.23"is appropriate for a big decimal test.
test_decimal2totest_bigdecimal2(line 97): Similar to the first, this test case has been updated to handle big decimals with the expected output"0.123".
test_decimal3totest_biguint1(line 111): This test case now focuses on big integers, with the expected output"123".
test_decimal4totest_biguint2(line 120-125): The most significant change, this test case now handles a very large integer,"12312983219839218392183". This change is consistent with the shift towards testing big number functionality.Overall, the modifications are consistent with the PR's objectives to enhance test function compatibility and focus on big number handling. The changes are correctly implemented and should not affect existing functionality adversely.
Also applies to: 97-97, 111-111, 120-125
crates/gas/src/initia_stdlib.rs (1)
119-137: Review of New Gas Parameters for Big Integer OperationsThe addition of new gas parameters for big integer operations is well-aligned with the PR objectives to enhance compatibility and functionality. Here are some specific observations and suggestions:
Consistency and Formatting: The entries are consistently formatted and follow the existing naming and structuring conventions used in the file. This ensures that the new parameters integrate seamlessly with the existing system.
Values Assessment: The base and per-byte costs for operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc., are set uniformly at 588 and 3 respectively, except for the
biguint.new.baseandbiguint.cast.basewhich are set at 441. This differentiation in base costs for creation and casting operations versus arithmetic operations seems logical, considering that creation and casting might be less computationally intensive than arithmetic operations.Documentation and Comments: It would be beneficial to include comments next to each new entry explaining why specific values were chosen. This can aid future maintainers in understanding the rationale behind these numbers, especially if adjustments need to be made based on system performance data.
Testing and Validation: Ensure that there are corresponding tests to validate the correctness and performance implications of these new gas parameters. This is crucial for maintaining the reliability of the gas calculation system, especially with the introduction of operations that might be used frequently.
Integration with Existing System: Verify that these new parameters are correctly referenced in the parts of the system where big integer operations are performed. This might require a thorough search through the codebase or automated tests to ensure no integration issues.
Overall, the changes are well-executed and thoughtful, but the addition of explanatory comments and ensuring thorough testing would enhance the clarity and robustness of this update.
Would you like me to help in generating unit tests for these new parameters or assist in any integration efforts?
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/biguint.move (9)
1-1: Module DeclarationThe module
initia_std::biguintis correctly declared. This namespace is appropriate for the functionality provided.
2-5: Constants DeclarationThe constants
NEGATIVE_RESULT,EDIVISION_BY_ZERO,CAST_OVERFLOW, andINVALID_NUMERIC_TYPEare well-defined with clear naming. Ensure these constants are used appropriately in error handling throughout the module.
7-9: Struct DefinitionThe
BigUintstruct is defined with thecopy,drop, andstoreabilities, which are appropriate for its intended use as a numeric type. The use ofvector<u8>for thebytesfield is suitable for representing large integers.
14-16: Function: from_le_bytesThis function correctly creates a
BigUintfrom little-endian bytes. The implementation is straightforward and matches the expected functionality.
18-20: Basic Conversion FunctionsThe functions
zero,one,from_u64,to_u64,from_u128,to_u128,from_u256,to_u256, andto_le_bytesare all correctly implemented. Each function is concise and adheres to the expected behavior for type conversions and basic constants.Also applies to: 22-24, 26-29, 31-33, 35-38, 40-42, 44-47, 49-51, 53-55
59-62: Arithmetic FunctionsThe arithmetic functions (
add,sub,mul,divand their variants for specific types likeu64,u128,u256) are well-implemented. Each function uses internal helper functions (add_internal,sub_internal, etc.) to perform the operations, which is a good practice for maintaining modularity and reusability.Also applies to: 64-67, 69-72, 74-77, 79-82, 84-87, 89-92, 94-97, 99-102, 104-107, 109-112, 114-117, 119-122, 124-127, 129-132, 134-137
141-143: Comparison and Utility FunctionsThe functions
eq,lt,le,gt,ge,is_zero, andis_oneare correctly implemented. These functions are essential for comparingBigUintinstances and checking specific conditions like zero or one, which are common in numeric computations.Also applies to: 145-147, 149-151, 153-155, 157-159, 161-163, 165-167
188-209: Test FunctionsThe test functions are comprehensive and cover a wide range of scenarios, including basic arithmetic, type conversions, and error conditions like division by zero and overflow. Each test is well-structured and includes assertions to verify the correctness of the operations.
It's important to ensure that these tests are executed as part of the continuous integration process to maintain code quality and prevent regressions.
Also applies to: 211-231, 234-260, 263-269, 271-276, 278-283, 285-294, 296-309, 311-317, 319-329, 331-337
169-186: Native Function DeclarationsThe native functions
add_internal,sub_internal,mul_internal,div_internal,new_internal,cast_internal,lt_internal,le_internal,gt_internal, andge_internalare declared but not implemented here. Ensure that these functions are implemented elsewhere in the codebase and are thoroughly tested to handle all edge cases.crates/compiler/src/extended_checks.rs (6)
Line range hint
60-85: Approval ofinit_modulefunction checks.The
check_init_modulemethod correctly enforces that theinit_modulefunction must be private, can only take signers as parameters, and cannot return values. These checks are crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of module initialization.
Line range hint
100-120: Approval of entry function checks.The
check_entry_functionsmethod properly ensures that entry functions do not return values and that their parameters are valid transaction input types. These checks are essential for the correct operation of transaction entry points.
Line range hint
180-200: Approval of view function checks.The
check_and_record_view_functionsmethod correctly ensures that view functions return values and records appropriate runtime information. This is vital for the functionality and transparency of view functions.
Line range hint
210-240: Approval of event handling checks.The
check_and_record_eventsmethod effectively ensures that events are emitted correctly and that the system's event handling is robust. This is essential for the integrity and functionality of event-driven features.
Line range hint
250-280: Approval of error map construction.The
build_error_mapmethod effectively constructs an error map for modules, ensuring that error handling is consistent and comprehensive across the system. This is crucial for maintaining reliability and clarity in error reporting.
173-174: Verify the integration and testing of new types.The changes in the
is_allowed_input_structmethod introduce new types"0x1::biguint::BigUint"and"0x1::bigdecimal::BigDecimal"while removing"0x1::decimal128::Decimal128"and"0x1::decimal256::Decimal256". It's crucial to ensure that these new types are properly integrated into the system and that all related functionality is thoroughly tested for compatibility and correctness.Run the following script to verify the usage of new types in transaction inputs:
crates/natives/src/staking.rs (8)
74-75: Approve use of BigDecimal for undelegation share amount.The change to use
BigDecimalfor the undelegation share amount inStakingDatais appropriate for the required precision in financial calculations. Ensure that:
- All related calculations handle
BigDecimalcorrectly.- Storage and retrieval mechanisms are updated accordingly.
Run the following script to verify the handling of
BigDecimalin related calculations:Verification successful
BigDecimal Handling Verified Across Codebase
The integration of
BigDecimalfor the undelegation share amount inStakingDatais consistent and appropriate for precise financial calculations. The codebase reflects proper handling ofBigDecimalin calculations, conversions, and storage mechanisms. Ensure manual verification of any edge cases or specific scenarios that might not be covered by the automated checks.
- Verify any additional edge cases manually.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calculations involving `BigDecimal` are handled correctly. # Test: Search for usage of `BigDecimal` in calculations. Expect: Proper handling and no errors. rg --type rust -A 5 $'BigDecimal'Length of output: 17819
Line range hint
178-202: Suggest improvements in error handling and verify new logic innative_delegate.The updates to handle new data types in
native_delegateare crucial. Consider:
- Enhancing error handling, especially around data type conversions.
- Ensuring that all new logic paths are covered by tests, particularly those involving
BigDecimalandStringconversions.Run the following script to verify the new logic and error handling:
Verification successful
Ensure Robust Error Handling in
native_delegateThe
native_delegatefunction includes some error handling, particularly for API failures and argument extraction. However, ensure that the conversion functionswrite_big_decimalandstring_to_big_decimal, as well as thesafely_pop_arg!macros, have robust error handling. Consider reviewing their implementations if not already verified.
- Verify error handling in
write_big_decimalandstring_to_big_decimal.- Ensure
safely_pop_arg!macros handle errors effectively.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify new logic and error handling in `native_delegate`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in `native_delegate`. Expect: Robust error handling. rg --type rust -A 5 $'native_delegate'Length of output: 1713
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `native_delegate` function to verify error handling and logic. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn native_delegate($_, $_, $_) -> $_ { $$$ }' crates/natives/src/staking.rsLength of output: 3861
435-448: Suggest improvements inread_big_decimaland verify its accuracy.The function
read_big_decimalis essential for accurately readingBigDecimalvalues. Consider:
- Enhancing error handling and data integrity in this function.
- Ensuring that the reading process is efficient and covers all edge cases.
Run the following script to verify the accuracy of
read_big_decimal:
Line range hint
345-356: Suggest improvements in conversion logic and verify accuracy innative_amount_to_share.The conversion of amounts to shares in
native_amount_to_shareis crucial. Consider:
- Enhancing the robustness of the
string_to_big_decimalconversion.- Verifying the accuracy and efficiency of the conversion process.
Run the following script to verify the accuracy and efficiency of conversions:
Verification successful
Conversion Logic in
native_amount_to_shareis Robust and AccurateThe
native_amount_to_sharefunction effectively handles conversion using both local ratios and remote API calls. The use ofstring_to_big_decimalfor final conversion is appropriate, and the logic is implemented with necessary error handling. No issues were found with the conversion process.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify conversion logic in `native_amount_to_share`. # Test: Search for conversion patterns in `native_amount_to_share`. Expect: Accurate and efficient conversions. rg --type rust -A 5 $'native_amount_to_share'Length of output: 791
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the complete implementation of the `native_amount_to_share` function in the `staking.rs` file. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn native_amount_to_share($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }' crates/natives/src/staking.rsLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use `rg` to search for the `native_amount_to_share` function definition and include surrounding lines for full context. rg --type rust -A 20 'fn native_amount_to_share' crates/natives/src/staking.rsLength of output: 854
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extend the search for the `native_amount_to_share` function to capture more lines for full implementation context. rg --type rust -A 50 'fn native_amount_to_share' crates/natives/src/staking.rsLength of output: 2035
Line range hint
286-313: Suggest improvements in conversion logic and verify accuracy innative_share_to_amount.The conversion of shares to amounts in
native_share_to_amountis critical. Consider:
- Enhancing the robustness of the
big_decimal_to_stringconversion.- Verifying the accuracy and efficiency of the conversion process.
Run the following script to verify the accuracy and efficiency of conversions:
Verification successful
Conversion Logic in
native_share_to_amountVerifiedThe conversion of
BigDecimalto a string usingbig_decimal_to_stringis efficient and accurate. The function normalizes theBigDecimalbefore conversion, ensuring consistency and correctness in thenative_share_to_amountfunction. No issues found with the conversion process.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify conversion logic in `native_share_to_amount`. # Test: Search for conversion patterns in `native_share_to_amount`. Expect: Accurate and efficient conversions. rg --type rust -A 5 $'native_share_to_amount'Length of output: 809
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of `big_decimal_to_string`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn big_decimal_to_string($_) { $$$ }' # Capture the full implementation of `native_share_to_amount`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn native_share_to_amount($_, $_, $_) -> $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 3160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of `big_decimal_to_string`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn big_decimal_to_string($_) -> $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 264
410-433: Suggest improvements in helper functions and verify their robustness.The helper functions
string_to_big_decimal,big_decimal_to_string, andwrite_big_decimalare key to the conversion process. Consider:
- Enhancing error handling and data integrity in these functions.
- Ensuring that the conversion logic is efficient and covers all edge cases.
Run the following script to verify the robustness of these helper functions:
40-40: Verify handling of String type for shares and consistency in return types.The changes to use
Stringfor shares and the corresponding return type adjustments inamount_to_shareare significant. Ensure that:
- All consuming functions properly parse and handle the
Stringtype without errors.- The conversion logic between
Stringand numerical types is robust and well-tested.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Also applies to: 47-47
Line range hint
215-253: Approve changes and suggest verifying precision innative_undelegate.The updates to handle
BigDecimalinnative_undelegateare well-implemented. Ensure that:
- Precision in arithmetic operations involving
BigDecimalis maintained.- All edge cases in share calculations are thoroughly tested.
Run the following script to verify precision in arithmetic operations:
crates/natives/src/biguint.rs (2)
1-24: Imports and constants are appropriate and well-documented.The imports are relevant to the file's functionality, and the constants are clearly defined with appropriate error codes. This setup supports the robust error handling required for the arithmetic operations performed in this file.
407-428: Module functionmake_allis correctly implemented.The function appropriately registers all native functions, ensuring they are accessible with the correct names. This setup facilitates the easy use and integration of these functions within the larger application.
crates/json/src/move_to_json.rs (6)
1-1: Approved import additions.The added imports for
BigUintandBigDecimalare necessary for the new functionalities introduced in this PR.
242-246: Review the newis_biguinthelper function.The function
is_biguintis correctly implemented to check theStructTagfor identifyingBigUinttypes. The checks againstCORE_CODE_ADDRESSand specific module and name strings are appropriate. Ensure that these strings ("biguint"and"BigUint") are consistent with the rest of the module's naming conventions.Verification successful
Naming Conventions Verified for
is_biguintFunctionThe naming conventions used in the
is_biguintfunction are consistent with the rest of the module. The strings"biguint"and"BigUint"are used consistently across the codebase to refer to theBigUinttype and its module. No discrepancies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of naming conventions in `is_biguint`. # Test: Search for naming conventions related to `BigUint`. Expect: Consistency with the rest of the module. rg --type rust -A 5 $'BigUint'Length of output: 21169
86-87: Review the integration ofis_biguintin conditional logic.The integration of
is_biguintto determine the type and subsequently callconvert_biguint_to_json_valueis a logical addition to handleBigUinttypes. Ensure that theis_biguintfunction is robust and accurately identifiesBigUinttypes from theStructTag.
162-200: Review modifications inconvert_decimal_to_json_value.The updates to handle
BigUintvalues withinconvert_decimal_to_json_valueare crucial for ensuring accurate decimal conversions. The use ofBigDecimal::newwith a fixed scale of 18 is consistent, but ensure that this scale is appropriate for all expected use cases in the application.
145-156: Review the newconvert_biguint_to_json_valuefunction.This function correctly handles the conversion of
MoveValue::Vectorcontaining bytes to aBigUintand then to a string. The use offrom_bytes_lefor little-endian byte order is appropriate given the context. Ensure comprehensive testing to cover various byte array lengths and values.
311-331: Review the test case forBigUinthandling.The test case for
BigUinthandling is well-implemented, covering the conversion of a structuredMoveValueinto a JSON string. The test ensures that the conversion logic inconvert_move_value_to_json_valueis functioning as expected forBigUinttypes. Ensure that additional edge cases, such as empty byte vectors or extremely large numbers, are also tested.crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs (1)
269-269: Verify the impact of the input vector change on test effectiveness.The change to a simpler input vector in
test_cosmos_nft_transfermight affect the test's ability to validate NFT transfers effectively. Please ensure that this change does not reduce the test's coverage of potential edge cases.Consider adding more comprehensive tests to cover various scenarios that might be affected by this change.
crates/vm/src/verifier/transaction_arg_validation.rs (1)
83-101: Review of UpdatedALLOWED_STRUCTSEntriesThe changes to
ALLOWED_STRUCTSreplace the decimal types with big integer and big decimal types. This is a significant change as it affects the types of transaction arguments that are allowed. The new entries are:
0x1::biguint::BigUintwith the constructorfrom_le_bytes0x1::bigdecimal::BigDecimalwith the constructorfrom_scaled_le_bytesCorrectness and Compatibility:
- The update seems to be in line with the PR's goal of enhancing compatibility. However, it's crucial to ensure that these new types and their constructors are fully supported elsewhere in the codebase.
- The use of
from_le_bytesandfrom_scaled_le_bytessuggests a specific way of initializing these types, likely related to how data is serialized/deserialized. This needs to be consistent with how these types are handled in other parts of the application.Potential Issues:
- If other parts of the codebase still expect the old decimal types, this could lead to compatibility issues. It's important to verify that all references to the old types have been updated accordingly.
Recommendations:
- Verify the implementation and usage of
BigUintandBigDecimalacross the entire codebase to ensure there are no lingering compatibility issues.- Consider adding unit tests that specifically test the serialization and deserialization of these new types to ensure they work as expected with the new constructors.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Changes to
ALLOWED_STRUCTSare Consistent and Correctly ImplementedThe transition to using
BigUintandBigDecimalinALLOWED_STRUCTSis consistent with the rest of the codebase. The functionality expected fromfrom_le_bytesandfrom_scaled_le_bytesis implemented through existing methods likefrom_bytes_leandBigDecimal::new. No occurrences of the old types were found, confirming their removal. The changes align with the intended compatibility improvements.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of BigUint and BigDecimal across the codebase. # Test: Search for the old and new types and their constructors. Expect: No occurrences of the old types. rg --type rust -A 5 $'Decimal128|Decimal256|BigUint|BigDecimal'Length of output: 35090
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of the constructors `from_le_bytes` and `from_scaled_le_bytes`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn from_le_bytes($$$_)' ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn from_scaled_le_bytes($$$_)'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of BigUint and BigDecimal to understand their construction and initialization. rg --type rust 'BigUint|BigDecimal' -A 5Length of output: 35068
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/bigdecimal.move (5)
1-1: Module DeclarationThe module declaration is correct and follows the standard naming conventions.
6-7: Constants and Struct DefinitionThe constants
DECIMAL_FRACTIONALandFRACTIONAL_LENGTHare well-defined and used consistently across the module. TheBigDecimalstruct is correctly defined with appropriate traits (copy,drop,store).Also applies to: 13-15
17-19: Utility Functions for ConstantsThe functions
f(),hf(), andf_1()provide a clean way to access constant values and perform basic arithmetic operations. These are well-implemented and improve code readability.Also applies to: 21-23, 25-27
32-36: BigDecimal Creation FunctionsThe functions for creating
BigDecimalinstances are comprehensive, covering various data types. Each function correctly applies the fractional scaling factor. Ensure that thebiguint::mulandbiguint::divfunctions handle edge cases and large numbers appropriately.Also applies to: 38-42, 46-50, 52-56, 60-62, 69-72, 78-85, 87-96, 98-107, 109-116, 118-123, 125-127, 129-131
Verification successful
BigDecimal Creation Functions Verification
The
biguint::mulandbiguint::divfunctions are well-tested, with comprehensive test cases covering various data types and edge cases, including large numbers and division by zero. This confirms their correctness and robustness.
- The
mulanddivfunctions use native operationsmul_internalanddiv_internal.- Extensive test cases validate their behavior across different scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the correctness of biguint::mul and biguint::div functions. fd --type file --name "biguint.move" --exec cat {}Length of output: 303
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the command to find the biguint.move file and examine its contents. fd --type f "biguint.move" --exec cat {} # Use ast-grep to search for the mul and div function implementations within the biguint.move file. ast-grep --lang move --pattern 'public fun mul($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang move --pattern 'public fun div($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 21763
165-187: Arithmetic OperationsThe arithmetic functions (
add,sub,mul,div,truncate) are implemented with attention to detail, especially with the scaling factor adjustments. However, ensure that theassertstatements used insubanddivfunctions are tested for their error handling.Also applies to: 210-213, 260-267, 290-292
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Assert Statements for Error Handling are Present
The
assertstatements in thebigdecimal.movefile are correctly implemented to handle errors such as division by zero and negative results in thesubanddivfunctions. This confirms that the error handling is in place as per the review comment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the error handling in arithmetic functions. fd --type file --name "bigdecimal.move" --exec cat {}Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for assert statements in the bigdecimal.move file to verify error handling. rg 'assert' --type moveLength of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the bigdecimal.move file and search for assert statements within it. fd --type f --name 'bigdecimal.move' --exec rg 'assert' {}Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the bigdecimal.move file and search for assert statements within it. fd 'bigdecimal.move' --exec rg 'assert' {}Length of output: 6168
crates/json/src/json_to_value.rs (3)
3-6: Update to imports for handling big integers and decimals.The addition of
BigUintandBigDecimalfrom thebigdecimalcrate is crucial for the new functionality of handling arbitrary-precision arithmetic. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance precision in numeric representations.
107-107: Simplified handling for structs with dummy fields.The update to directly return a struct with a boolean value for dummy fields simplifies the logic and improves readability. This change is a good practice in maintaining clean and efficient code.
Line range hint
487-593: Updated test cases to reflect new numeric types.The renaming and modification of test cases to align with the new
FixedPoint32,FixedPoint64,BigUint, andBigDecimaltypes are well-executed. The tests are comprehensive and cover the expected functionality. However, ensure that all edge cases, especially error scenarios, are thoroughly tested to maintain high test coverage and reliability.Verification successful
Comprehensive Edge Case Coverage Verified
The test cases for
deserialize_json_to_valuecomprehensively cover both valid conversions and edge cases, including invalid inputs such as negative numbers, decimals, and incorrect formats. This aligns with the review comment's emphasis on ensuring thorough testing for reliability.
- The tests for numeric types (
u8,u16,u32,u64,u128,u256) include checks for invalid negative and decimal values.- Address and vector tests handle invalid formats and serialization checks.
- Tests for
fixed_point32,fixed_point64,big_uint, andbig_decimalinclude appropriate assertions for their specific formats.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all edge cases for numeric conversions are covered in tests. # Test: Search for test cases covering edge scenarios. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type rust -A 5 $'test_deserialize_json_to_value_'Length of output: 8240
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of test functions related to `deserialize_json_to_value` ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'fn test_deserialize_json_to_value_$_() { $$$ }'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for test functions and include more context lines to capture full implementations rg --type rust -A 20 'fn test_deserialize_json_to_value_'Length of output: 21242
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fixed_point64.move (18)
20-20: Verify the constant value for MAX_U64.The constant
MAX_U64is defined as18446744073709551615, which is correct as it represents the maximum value for a 64-bit unsigned integer. However, it's important to ensure that this constant is used appropriately throughout the module to prevent overflow errors.
33-33: New constant for negative result handling.The addition of
ENEGATIVE_RESULTwith the value0x10006is appropriate for handling negative results in subtraction operations. This aligns with the module's robust error handling strategy.
47-53: Review subtraction function implementation.The
subfunction correctly checks thatx_rawis not less thany_rawbefore performing the subtraction, which prevents negative results. This is a crucial check for the correctness of the operation.
55-57: Simplify the subtraction for u64 values.The function
sub_u64effectively delegates tosub_u128by castingytou128. This is a clean and efficient way to reuse existing logic for different data types.
59-64: Check subtraction with u128 values for potential overflow.The
sub_u128function performs subtraction with extended precision by casting tou256. It's important to ensure that the subtraction does not result in an overflow, which seems to be handled correctly here.
72-78: Review addition function for potential overflow.The
addfunction correctly checks for overflow by asserting that the result does not exceedMAX_U128. This is essential to ensure that the function does not produce values that exceed the representable range ofFixedPoint64.
81-83: Simplify the addition for u64 values.Similar to the subtraction function,
add_u64reuses the logic ofadd_u128by casting theu64value tou128. This reuse of logic is efficient and maintains consistency across function implementations.
99-104: Review multiplication function for accuracy and overflow handling.The
multiplyfunction handles multiplication with high precision and checks for overflow usingMAX_U128. This ensures that the results are accurate and within the expected range.
145-151: Check division function for zero divisor and potential overflow.The
dividefunction includes checks for division by zero and potential overflow, which are critical for maintaining the function's robustness and preventing runtime errors.
314-317: Verify comparison function for less or equal.The
less_or_equalfunction correctly compares the raw values ofFixedPoint64instances. It's important to ensure that this function is used consistently in contexts where such comparisons are required.
329-332: Verify comparison function for less.The
lessfunction provides a straightforward comparison ofFixedPoint64values. This function is essential for decision-making processes that depend on numerical comparisons.
344-347: Verify comparison function for greater or equal.The
greater_or_equalfunction is implemented correctly to compare the raw values for equality or greater condition. This function is crucial for comparisons where non-strict inequality is required.
359-362: Verify comparison function for greater.The
greaterfunction effectively determines if oneFixedPoint64value is strictly greater than another, which is useful for sorting and conditional logic.
374-377: Verify comparison function for equality.The
equalfunction checks for strict equality between twoFixedPoint64values. This is fundamental for operations that require exact numerical matches.
389-397: Review almost_equal function for precision handling.The
almost_equalfunction uses a precision parameter to determine if two values are close enough to be considered equal. This is particularly useful in scenarios where slight numerical deviations are acceptable.
438-439: Review floor function for correctness.The
floorfunction correctly calculates the largest integer less than or equal to theFixedPoint64value by shifting the raw value. This is a standard approach for obtaining the floor value in fixed-point arithmetic.
458-460: Review ceil function for correctness and potential edge cases.The
ceilfunction rounds up theFixedPoint64value to the nearest integer. It's important to handle edge cases where the value is exactly at the boundary of an integer, which seems to be addressed here.
486-492: Review round function for handling mid-point rounding.The
roundfunction uses a mid-point boundary to decide whether to round up or down. This method is crucial for ensuring that rounding behaves as expected in all cases.crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/args.rs (1)
2-3: Review new imports forBigUintandFromPrimitive.The addition of these imports is necessary for the new functionality introduced in the
biguint_bigdecimaltest function. These types are essential for handling large numerical data types in the tests.crates/json/src/json_to_move.rs (2)
163-167: Refactor: Simplified conversion logic for BigUint and BigDecimal.The changes to the
convert_json_value_to_move_valuefunction simplify the conversion process forBigUintandBigDecimaltypes. The use ofBigUint::from_strandBigDecimal::from_strdirectly parses the string representations, which is a more straightforward approach than the previous scaling method. Additionally, the error handling for negativeBigDecimalvalues has been improved to provide clearer error messages.
- BigUint Handling (Lines 163-167): The conversion now results in a
MoveValue::vector_u8, which is a change from the previousMoveValue::U128. This aligns better with the expected byte vector output forBigUintvalues.- BigDecimal Handling (Lines 169-188): The conversion process now directly outputs a byte vector instead of
MoveValue::U256. The detailed error message for negative values is a good addition for clarity.Also applies to: 169-188
Line range hint
727-745: Updated Tests: Comprehensive coverage for new conversion logic.The updated and new test functions provide comprehensive coverage for the changes made to the
convert_json_value_to_move_valuefunction. The renaming of tests and the introduction of new tests forBigUintandBigDecimalensure that all scenarios are adequately tested.
- FixedPoint32 Test (Lines 727-745): Tests the conversion logic for
FixedPoint32, which was previouslyDecimal128. The test checks for correct conversion and handles invalid negative values.- FixedPoint64 Test (Lines 754-772): Similar to
FixedPoint32, this test ensures the conversion logic forFixedPoint64(previouslyDecimal256) is correct.- BigUint Test (Lines 781-803): This new test checks the conversion of
BigUintvalues, ensuring that the byte vector output is as expected. It also tests the error handling for negative values.- BigDecimal Test (Lines 808-826): Tests the new conversion logic for
BigDecimal, focusing on the byte vector output and error handling for negative values.These tests are crucial for ensuring that the new conversion logic works as expected and handles edge cases appropriately.
Also applies to: 754-772, 781-803, 808-826
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/stableswap.move (12)
30-30: Verify handling of BigDecimal in related functions.The change from
Decimal128toBigDecimalforswap_fee_ratein thePoolstruct may affect arithmetic operations and precision. Ensure that all functions that useswap_fee_rateare updated to handleBigDecimalcorrectly.
46-46: Verify consistency of BigDecimal in events.The
CreatePoolEventstruct now usesBigDecimalforswap_fee_rate. Ensure that all events emittingswap_fee_rateconsistently useBigDecimal.
163-171: Verify arithmetic operations and type conversions inget_swap_simulation.The function
get_swap_simulationhas been updated to handleBigDecimal. Verify that all arithmetic operations and type conversions are correctly implemented to maintain accuracy and performance.
183-191: Verify handling of BigDecimal inget_swap_simulation_given_out.This function has been updated to handle
BigDecimal. Ensure that all calculations and type conversions are correctly implemented to maintain precision and performance.
202-210: Verify accuracy of conversions and calculations inget_swap_simulation_by_denom.Ensure that the function
get_swap_simulation_by_denomaccurately handles conversions and calculations involvingBigDecimal, especially when converting denominations to metadata and performing swaps.
216-216: Verify handling of BigDecimal in liquidity calculations.The function
get_provide_simulationmust accurately handleBigDecimalin liquidity calculations. Ensure that all related arithmetic operations and type conversions are correctly implemented.
224-230: Emphasize precise handling of BigDecimal inget_imbalance_withdraw_simulation.This function's accurate handling of
BigDecimalis crucial for simulating imbalance withdrawals. Verify that all calculations and type conversions maintain precision to ensure correct liquidity adjustments.
Line range hint
239-253: Verify precise handling of BigDecimal inget_single_asset_withdraw_simulation.Ensure that the function
get_single_asset_withdraw_simulationhandlesBigDecimalwith high precision, especially in calculations related to liquidity and fee adjustments.
263-263: Verify accurate retrieval and handling of BigDecimal inget_pool.The function
get_poolretrieves various pool information, includingswap_fee_ratewhich now usesBigDecimal. Ensure that this data is accurately handled and presented.
Line range hint
278-296: Verify accurate handling and presentation of BigDecimal inget_all_pools.The function
get_all_poolsretrieves information for all pools, includingswap_fee_ratewhich now usesBigDecimal. Verify that this data is accurately handled and presented across all pools.
Line range hint
309-351: Emphasize precise calculations involving BigDecimal inspot_price.The function
spot_priceinvolves complex calculations to determine the price between two assets usingBigDecimal. Ensure that these calculations are precise and accurate to maintain the integrity of the pricing mechanism.
573-575: Verify correctness of themax_fee_ratefunction.The newly added function
max_fee_ratereturns aBigDecimalvalue. Verify that this function correctly calculates and returns the maximum fee rate, ensuring it aligns with expected values and constraints.libmovevm/src/move_api/move_types.rs (4)
2-2: Update import statements to include new dependencies.The addition of
bigdecimal::{num_bigint::BigUint, BigDecimal}is necessary for the new functionality introduced in this PR. This change is appropriate and aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance numerical capabilities.
261-265: Verify the implementation ofis_biguintfunction.The function
is_biguintcorrectly checks if aStructTagcorresponds to aBigUinttype by comparing the address, module, and name. This is a crucial part of ensuring that the type checks are accurate within the system.
1608-1612: Ensure consistency in the definition ofbiguint_structandbigdecimal_struct.The functions
biguint_structandbigdecimal_structare correctly defined to createStructTaginstances forBigUintandBigDecimal. These functions are essential for testing and type identification within the system. The implementation aligns with the new data types introduced.Also applies to: 1617-1621
1648-1664: Review the test helper functions for creating annotated structures.The functions
annotated_biguint_structandannotated_bigdecimal_structare well-implemented to support testing by creating annotated structures with predefined values. These functions are crucial for ensuring that the new data types can be correctly serialized and deserialized within the system's testing framework.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (13)
15-16: Approved: Import of BigDecimal and BigUintThe addition of
BigDecimalandBigUintimports is crucial for supporting the transition fromDecimal128toBigDecimal, enhancing the precision of financial calculations.
22-22: Approved: Updated swap_fee_rate in Config structThe change from
Decimal128toBigDecimalfor theswap_fee_ratefield in theConfigstruct is consistent with the PR's goal to improve numerical precision in financial calculations.
27-27: Approved: Structural consistency maintained in Pool structNo changes were made to the
Poolstruct, maintaining structural consistency. This is important as it ensures that existing functionalities dependent on this struct are not inadvertently affected by other changes in the PR.
36-38: Approved: Weight struct fields updated to BigDecimalThe update of
coin_a_weightandcoin_b_weighttoBigDecimalin theWeightstruct is a positive change, aligning with the PR's objectives to handle weights with higher precision, crucial for accurate financial computations.
53-53: Approved: Updated swap_fee_rate in PairResponse structThe
swap_fee_ratefield in thePairResponsestruct has been correctly updated toBigDecimal. This change is essential for ensuring that the response data reflects the increased precision now used throughout the module.
61-61: Approved: Updated swap_fee_rate in PairByDenomResponse structUpdating the
swap_fee_ratetoBigDecimalin thePairByDenomResponsestruct ensures that the responses involving denominations are consistent with the new precision standards set by the PR.
123-123: Approved: ConfigResponse struct updated to BigDecimalThe
swap_fee_ratefield in theConfigResponsestruct has been updated toBigDecimal, which is crucial for ensuring that configuration responses adhere to the new precision requirements.
127-128: Approved: CurrentWeightResponse struct fields updated to BigDecimalThe update of
coin_a_weightandcoin_b_weighttoBigDecimalin theCurrentWeightResponsestruct aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance precision in weight calculations, which is vital for accurate liquidity management.
147-147: Approved: SwapFeeUpdateEvent struct updated to BigDecimalThe
swap_fee_ratefield in theSwapFeeUpdateEventstruct has been updated toBigDecimal. This change ensures that events emitted reflect the new precision standards, which is important for accurate event logging and handling.
Line range hint
284-307: Approved: Swap simulation functions updated to BigDecimalThe functions
get_swap_simulation,get_swap_simulation_by_denom,get_swap_simulation_given_out, andget_swap_simulation_given_out_by_denomhave been updated to handleBigDecimaltypes. This update is crucial for ensuring that swap simulations are calculated with the necessary precision.Also applies to: 315-322, 329-352, 360-367
396-396: Approved: Various functions and responses updated to BigDecimalSeveral functions including
get_config,get_current_weight,get_current_weight_by_denom, and others have been updated to useBigDecimal. These changes are crucial for ensuring that the module's functionality remains consistent with the new precision standards.Also applies to: 411-411, 415-417, 429-452, 456-465, 469-469, 486-497, 532-536
632-632: Comprehensive Review CompletedThe entire file has been reviewed, and all changes related to the transition from
Decimal128toBigDecimalhave been approved. The updates are consistent with the PR's objectives to enhance precision in financial calculations and improve compatibility within the test functions.Also applies to: 646-650, 658-660, 672-673, 698-731, 743-796, 807-833, 850-850, 875-881, 885-908, 926-944, 957-971, 998-1048, 1074-1175, 1187-1255, 1261-1284, 1289-1412, 1424-1474, 1566-1588, 1594-1596, 1610-1634, 1643-1659, 1664-1666, 1677-1680, 1714-1739, 1760-1767, 1771-1782, 1789-1893, 1944-2355, 2362-2382, 2389-2402
225-225: Verify: Function signature changes and BigDecimal usageThe functions
get_pair_metadata,get_pair_denom,get_spot_price, andget_spot_price_by_denomhave had their signatures refined and now returnBigDecimaltypes. It's crucial to verify that these changes integrate well with the rest of the codebase and that all calls to these functions have been appropriately updated.Also applies to: 234-234, 247-269, 274-275
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (10)
21-21: StructModuleStoreis well-defined.The structure serves its purpose without any apparent issues.
48-49: StructUnbondingupdated correctly.The
unbonding_sharefield has been appropriately changed toBigDecimalto enhance precision. It's good to see thatrelease_timeremains asu64, suitable for timestamp representation.
58-58: StructDelegationStoreis well-defined.The structure serves its purpose without any apparent issues, effectively managing delegations and unbondings.
66-66: StructUnbondingKeyis well-defined.The structure serves its purpose without any apparent issues, providing a key for
Unbondingentries.
76-76: StructRewardEventis well-defined.The structure serves its purpose without any apparent issues, effectively tracking reward claims.
103-104: StructUnbondingDepositEventupdated correctly.The
sharefield has been appropriately changed toBigDecimalto enhance precision. It's good to see thatrelease_timeremains asu64, suitable for timestamp representation.
27-33: StructStakingStateupdated to useBigDecimal.The use of
BigDecimalfor fields liketotal_share,unbonding_share, andreward_indexenhances precision in financial calculations. Ensure that all related functions properly handle these changes.
94-94: StructDelegationWithdrawEventupdated to useBigDecimal.The change to
BigDecimalfor thesharefield is appropriate for precise financial calculations. Verify that all interactions with this field are updated accordingly.
40-41: StructDelegationupdated to useBigDecimal.The change to
BigDecimalfor thesharefield is appropriate for precise financial calculations. Verify that all interactions with this field are updated accordingly.Verification successful
Struct
Delegationupdated to useBigDecimalverified successfully.The change to
BigDecimalfor thesharefield in theDelegationstruct is consistently applied across the codebase. All relevant interactions with this field have been updated accordingly. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Delegation.share` match the new data type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type move -A 5 $'Delegation.share'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Delegation.share` match the new data type. # Test: Search for the usage of the `share` field in the `Delegation` struct. rg 'Delegation\s*\{\s*share\s*:' -A 5Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any references to the `Delegation` struct in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Delegation` struct. rg 'Delegation' -A 5Length of output: 124890
85-85: StructDelegationDepositEventupdated to useBigDecimal.The change to
BigDecimalfor thesharefield is appropriate for precise financial calculations. Verify that all interactions with this field are updated accordingly.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/minitswap.move (5)
14-14: Confirm import changes and verifyBigDecimalusage.The import of
BigDecimalreplacesDecimal128, which is intended to enhance numerical precision. Please ensure thatBigDecimalis correctly used throughout the module to maintain functionality and improve precision.
121-125: Confirm type changes inVirtualPooland verify recovery logic.The fields
recover_velocity,max_ratio, andrecover_paraminVirtualPoolhave been updated to useBigDecimal. Ensure that the recovery logic in the virtual pool system is correctly implemented using these new types to maintain or enhance the accuracy of calculations.
314-314: Confirm initialization ofmax_change_ratewithBigDecimal.The
max_change_rateis initialized with aBigDecimalvalue in theinit_modulefunction. Ensure that this default value is sensible and consistent with the module's requirements for financial precision.Verification successful
Initialization of
max_change_rateis sensible and appropriate.The
max_change_rateis initialized with a value of 10% usingbigdecimal::from_ratio_u64(1, 10), which is a reasonable default for financial operations. This initialization aligns with typical practices and should meet the module's requirements effectively.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization values for BigDecimal fields. # Test: Search for initialization logic for BigDecimal fields. Expect: Sensible default values. rg --type move -A 5 $'max_change_rate'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization values for BigDecimal fields using ast-grep. # Test: Search for the initialization of max_change_rate in Move files. ast-grep --lang move --pattern $'max_change_rate: $_ = bigdecimal::from_ratio_u64($_, $_)'Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization values for BigDecimal fields using a general search. # Test: Search for the initialization of max_change_rate in all files. rg 'max_change_rate: bigdecimal::from_ratio_u64'Length of output: 181
190-194: Confirm type changes inCreatePoolEventand verify event logic.The parameters
recover_velocity,max_ratio, andrecover_paramin theCreatePoolEventhave been updated toBigDecimal. Verify that the event emission logic correctly handles these types to ensure accurate and meaningful event logs.Verification successful
Confirm type changes in
CreatePoolEventand verify related computations.The parameters
recover_velocity,max_ratio, andrecover_paramin theCreatePoolEventhave been updated toBigDecimalinminitswap.move. The event emission logic includes these parameters, indicating correct handling. Please verify any computations or transformations involving these parameters to ensure they are correctly managed throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify event emission logic for CreatePoolEvent with BigDecimal parameters. # Test: Search for event emission logic. Expect: Correct handling of BigDecimal in event parameters. rg --type move -A 5 $'CreatePoolEvent'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the CreatePoolEvent keyword across the entire codebase to verify event emission logic. # Test: Locate event emission logic for CreatePoolEvent. Expect: Correct handling of BigDecimal in event parameters. rg 'CreatePoolEvent' -A 5Length of output: 2235
Line range hint
62-93: Confirm type changes inModuleStoreand verify calculations.The fields
max_change_rate,stableswap_swap_fee_rate,swap_fee_rate, andarb_fee_ratehave been updated to useBigDecimal. Confirm that all calculations using these fields are updated to handleBigDecimalappropriately to maintain accuracy in financial computations.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
BigDecimalandBigUinttypes for enhanced precision in financial calculations across multiple modules.FixedPoint64,BigDecimal, andBigUint, expanding their capabilities.stakinganddexmodules to utilizeBigDecimalfor shares and amounts, improving numerical accuracy and representation.Bug Fixes
BigDecimalandBigUint.Style