Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tags review: which tags are in which contrasts? #81

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ferponcem
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is a continuation of the efforts started in #73, just that now we're looking at every tag and listing the contrasts annotated with it. From there, we can suggest to maintain/remove/annotate more contrasts with it.

This initial commit summarizes the discussions of 04/Dec and 11/Dec/2024, with more to come.
Staring with the tags:

  • naturalistic_scenes : added it to flora and fruits visual stimuli, without the capital letters
  • removed attentional_focusing in favour of selective_attention. to me, this two refer to the same thing, but selective_attention appears more consistently through our contrasts
  • removed auditory_imagery as we don't have any task that ask subjects to imagine sounds, please correct me if I'm wrong
  • auditory_attention is left only in control conditions, otherwise it's redundant
  • auditory_recognition is now in all audio-stimuli when there are several categories
  • body_maintenance was added to the visual body stimuli from the MultiModal task, along with face_maintenance and object_maintenance, as this is a 1-back working mem task
  • added color_perception to other tasks where color places a role (say which color happend more, etc)
  • added decision_making to tasks where subjects have to choose between 2 or more explicit options

I'll keep updating with the following discussions, please let me know what you think (:

Copy link
Member

@bthirion bthirion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM so far

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants