correcting typos pt 2

ibc_data/ibc_tasks.tsv

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ FingerTapping	This task is a part of the CamCAN (`Cambridge Centre for Ageing an
 VSTMC	This task is a part of the CamCAN (`Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience <https://www.cam-can.org/>`__) battery, designed to understand how individuals can best retain cognitive abilities into old age. The adjustments concerned the translation of all stimuli and instructions into french, replacing Matlab functions with Octave functions as needed, and eliminating the use of a custom Matlab toolbox `mrisync <https://github.com/MRC-CBU/mrisync>`__ that was used to interface with the MRI Scanner (3T Siemens Prisma) over a National Instruments card. All modifications were done taking care to not alter the psychological state that the original tasks were designed to capture. The **Visual Short-Term Memory** task was designed to assess the neural process underlying visual short-term memory. In each trial, participants saw three arrays of colored dots: one red, one yellow, and one blue. The dot displays were presented in rapid succession beginning with a 250 ms fixation period followed by a 500 ms presentation of the dot display. To manipulate set size, one, two, or three of the dot displays moved in a single direction, which had to be remembered. The remaining displays rotated around a central axis and served as distractors, which had to be ignored. After the presentation of the third display, an 8-second delay followed, during which participants had to remember the direction(s) of motion for the non-rotating dots. Subsequently, the probe display appeared, with a colored circle indicating which dot display to recall (red, yellow, or blue). Within the circle, there was a pointer that had to be adjusted to indicate the direction in which the target dot display had been moving. Participants were given 5 seconds to adjust the pointer to match the direction of the to-be-remembered dot display. On 90% of trials the probed movements were in one of three directions: 7, 127, or 247 degrees.	Octave 4.4 + Psychtoolbox 3.0	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1280x1024	`See demo <https://youtu.be/87LIunmzY3A>`__		
 RewProc	"The **Reward Processing** protocol was adapted from `O'Doherty et al., 2001 <https://doi.org/10.1038/82959>`__ and `O'Doherty et al., 2003 <https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-21-07931.2003>`__, which aimed at discerning the role of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) using a similar emotion-related visual reversal-learning task in which choice of the correct stimulus led to a probabistically determined ""monetary"" reward and choice of the incorrect stimulus led to a monetary loss. :raw-html:`<br />` In each trial of a run of this protocol, two unfamiliar and easily discriminable fractal patterns were displayed on a gray background, positioned to the left and right of a central fixation cross. At the beginning of the task, one of these two patterns was arbitrarily designated as ""correct"" and the other as ""incorrect"". The task for the participants was to select one of these two patterns. Selecting the correct pattern led to a monetary gain with a 70% probability, and a monetary loss with a 30% probability. Selecting the incorrect pattern led to a monetary gain with a 30% probability and a monetary loss with a 70% probability (reversed gain-loss probability contingencies). After selecting either pattern, a black box appeared around the chosen pattern, followed by feedback indicating the amount of symbolic money (either 20 or 10 units) that was gained or lost in the particular trial which could be either 20 or 10 units. The probability of receiving either 10 or 20 units of money was equal. Furthermore, if the participant consecutively selected the correct pattern for a specified criterion, i.e. 5 consecutive times, a reversal of the gain-loss probability contingencies occurred after a Poisson process. This meant that there was a 25% probability that a reversal took place in the gain-loss probabilities on any post-criterion trial. :raw-html:`<br />` The data was acquired in 2 runs during one scanning session. Each run comprised 85 trials. he timing of trial events in the IBC implementation of the task differed from those in the two aforementioned studies. This adjustment was made after a discussion with the authors, who believed that the timing in the final IBC-implementation version was more appropriate for achieving adequately separated events to minimize temporal correlations while maintaining a reasonable total trial length. Specifically, the pre-fixation cross was displayed for a duration ranging from 500 to 1500 ms. The stimuli remained on the screen for less than 3000 ms for participant selection, and the outcome feedback was presented with a 1750 ms delay, lasting for 1750 ms."	Psychopy 2021.1.3 (Python 3.8.5)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1600x1200	`See demo <https://youtu.be/T4j51Y0YPoQ>`__		`Repository <https://github.com/individual-brain-charting/public_protocols/tree/master/RewProc>`__
 NARPS	This protocol is more commonly know as the mixed gambles task and was adapted from the **Neuroimaging Analysis Replication and Prediction Study** (NARPS) (`Botvinik-Nezer et al., 2019 <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0113-7>`__) study, that aimed to estimate the variability of neuroscientific results across analysis teams. The mixed gambles task though, is originally from (`Tom et al., 2007 <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239>`__) that studied the neural basis of loss aversion, which is the phenomenon that suggests that people tend to be more sensitive to losses as compared to equal-sized gains. The study therefore, investigated whether potential losses elicit negative emotions, which then drive loss aversion or rather the same neural systems, encoding subjective value, asymmetrically respond to losses compared to gains. :raw-html:`<br />` In each trial, participants were presented with a mixed gamble where they had a 50% chance of either gaining one amount of symbolic money or losing another amount. The possible gains and losses both ranged between 5-20 units (equal range condition), in increments of 1 unit and all 256 possible combinations of gains and losses were presented to each subject in the same sequence. The stimulus consisted of a circle presented on a gray screen and divided into two halves: on one side the gain amount was presented in green with a plus (+) sign before the number, and on the other side the loss amount was presented in red with a minus (-) sign before the number. Subjects were then asked to decide whether or not they would like to accept the gambles presented to them, with four possible responses for each gamble: strongly accept, weakly accept, weakly reject or strongly reject. :raw-html:`<br />`The data was acquired in four runs during one scanning session. Each run comprised 64 trials. The gamble was presented on the screen until the participant responded or four seconds have passed, followed by a grey screen until the onset of the next trial. In the aforementioned NARPS study, the same amount of data was also acquired for an equal indifference condition where the possible gains ranged between 10-40 units while losses ranged between 5-20 units. This was not done for the IBC implementation, as no significant differences were observed between the two task designs in the NARPS study.	 Psychtoolbox-3 (Octave 5.2.0)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1600x1200	`See demo <https://youtu.be/CE_zR7AwQtw>`__		`Repository <https://github.com/individual-brain-charting/public_protocols/tree/master/NARPS>`__
-FaceBody	This protocol was adapted from (`Stigliani A 2015 <https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-14.2015>`__), where it was used to define category-selective cortical regions that respond preferentially to different categories. A detailed description and code for the original protocol is available `here <https://github.com/VPNL/fLoc>`__. In the IBC implementation, participants were presented with images of the following categories: faces, places, bodies, objects and characters. Each of the five stimulus categories was associated with two related subcategories with 144 images per subcategory, see `conditions table <condFaceBody_>`__. The protocol used a mini-block design in which 12 stimuli of the same subcategory were presented in each block. The sequence of the blocks was randomized over the ten subcategories and a blank baseline condition, and each subject was presented with the same sequence. To ensure that the subjects remained alert throughout the experiment, they were asked to press a button when an image is repeated as a mirrored image (flipped 1-back task). Data were acquired in four runs during one scanning session. Each run comprised of 76 blocks, each consisting of 12 images and with a duration of 6 seconds (500 ms/image).	Psychtoolbox-3 (Octave 5.2.0)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1920x1080	`See demo <https://youtu.be/zmFnmdE8Sd0>`__		`Repository <https://github.com/individual-brain-charting/public_protocols/tree/master/FaceBody>`__
+FaceBody	This protocol was adapted from (`Stigliani A 2015 <https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-14.2015>`__), where it was used to define category-selective cortical regions that respond preferentially to different categories. A detailed description and code for the original protocol is available `here <https://github.com/VPNL/fLoc>`__. In the IBC implementation, participants were presented with images of the following categories: faces, places, bodies, objects and characters. Each of the five stimulus categories was associated with two related subcategories with 144 images per subcategory, see `conditions table <condFaceBody_>`__. The protocol used a mini-block design in which 12 stimuli of the same subcategory were presented in each block. The sequence of the blocks was randomized over the ten subcategories and a blank baseline condition, and each subject was presented with the same sequence. To ensure that the subjects remained alert throughout the experiment, they were asked to press a button when an image is repeated as a mirrored image (flipped 1-back task). Data were acquired in four runs during one scanning session. Every run comprised 76 blocks, with each block containing 12 images displayed for a total duration of 6 seconds (500 ms per image).	Psychtoolbox-3 (Octave 5.2.0)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1920x1080	`See demo <https://youtu.be/zmFnmdE8Sd0>`__		`Repository <https://github.com/individual-brain-charting/public_protocols/tree/master/FaceBody>`__
 Scene	This protocol was adapted from (`Douglas et al., 2017 <https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22673>`__) and was designed to identify how the brain combines spatial elements to form a coherent percept. To this end, participants judged whether Escher-like scenes were possible or impossible. 56 scenes were designed so that they appeared spatially incoherent when viewed from a particular angle, and were termed *impossible scenes*. Possible counterparts were created to each impossible scene, and these were termed *possible scenes*. For comparison, baseline non-scene images were created by scrambling the scenes and matched for low-level visual properties. A partially transparent circle was overlaid at a pseudo-random location on each of the scrambled scenes, such that half of these dots were found on the left and half on the right of the baseline scrambled images. On these scrambled image dot trials, participants indicated the left/right location of the dot. There were easy and hard versions that depended on the transparency of the overlaid circle. The data were acquired in four runs during one scanning session.	E-Prime 2.0 Professional (Psychological Software Tools, Inc.)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1920x1080	`See demo <https://youtu.be/QlqIMf-w2V4>`__		
 BreathHolding	This task was a part of the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) (`Keator et al., 2016 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.003>`__) battery of protocols designed to, among other goals, assess the major sources of variation in fMRI studies conducted across scanners, including instrumentation, acquisition protocols, challenge tasks, and analysis methods. All modifications were done taking care to not alter the psychological state that the original tasks were designed to capture. The BreathHolding task was designed to measure vascular response. In a block design, the participant alternated between breathing normally for 20 s and holding their breath for 16 s. They were given a warning 2 s before the hold breath signal was given, so they could prepare to hold their breath. This cycle was repeated 10 times. No response was required in this task.	E-Prime 2.0 Professional (Psychological Software Tools, Inc.)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1280x960			
 Checkerboard	This task was a part of the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) (`Keator et al., 2016 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.003>`__) battery of protocols designed to, among other goals, assess the major sources of variation in fMRI studies conducted across scanners, including instrumentation, acquisition protocols, challenge tasks, and analysis methods. All modifications were done taking care to not alter the psychological state that the original tasks were designed to capture. The Checkerboard task is a block design sensorimotor task with alternating 16s long blocks of rest and visual stimulation with a checkerboard stimulus. In the checkerboard block, a checkerboard filling the visual field was presented for a period of 200 ms at random intervals (avg. ISI=762 ms, range: 500-1000 ms), and the subject pressed a button each time the checkerboard appeared on screen. The run starts and ends with fixation blocks, and 11 blocks of checkerboard stimulation are presented.	E-Prime 2.0 Professional (Psychological Software Tools, Inc.)	Five-button ergonomic pad (Current Designs, Package 932 with Pyka HHSC-1x5-N4)		1280x960