Skip to content

Issues: iipc/warc-specifications

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

41 Open 29 Closed
41 Open 29 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

IPv6 address representation in WARC-IP-Address field proposal warc-format
#100 opened Nov 20, 2024 by sebastian-nagel
4
WARC-Resource-Type field possibilities (feedback wanted)
#96 opened Mar 4, 2024 by ikreymer
8
Multiple extension-fields of the same type on the same record? warc-format
#95 opened Jan 8, 2024 by acidus99
2
Version dates on WARC Implementation Guidelines might be wrong
#91 opened Aug 24, 2023 by Mr0grog
WARC-Cipher-Suite field proposal proposal warc-format
#86 opened May 31, 2023 by acidus99
6
SHA256 or SHA-256? question warc-format
#80 opened Jun 20, 2022 by nclarkekb
17
Deprecate line folding proposal warc-format
#74 opened Jul 4, 2021 by ato
2
Harmonise language for which header fields are permitted in which records proposal warc-format
#73 opened Jul 4, 2021 by JustAnotherArchivist
Ambiguous WARC-Filename value definition WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#72 opened Jul 4, 2021 by JustAnotherArchivist
Insufficient definition of quoted-string WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#71 opened Jul 4, 2021 by JustAnotherArchivist
5
Missing W3CDTF reference for date format WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#70 opened Jul 4, 2021 by JustAnotherArchivist
1
Encoded-words underspecified and unsupported proposal warc-format
#67 opened Sep 13, 2020 by yotann2
1
WARC-Block-Digest and WARC-Payload-Digest examples are invalid WARC/1.1-possible-errata
#64 opened Apr 30, 2020 by ato
Duplicate definition of w3c-iso8601 WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#60 opened Mar 6, 2020 by JustAnotherArchivist
Please document possible hopsFromSeed values proposal warc-format
#59 opened Mar 2, 2020 by RvanVeenendaal
2
Revisit example in section 10.6 uses message/http not application/http WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#55 opened Aug 16, 2019 by ato
WIP: Document practices that may benefit from standardisation
#54 opened Jul 3, 2019 by anjackson
3
WARC-Conversion-Software and WARC-Conversion-Command fields proposal warc-format
#52 opened Mar 5, 2019 by ato
5
WARC-Refers-To-Target-URI / WARC-Refers-To-Target-Date header fields not allowed in conversion records proposal warc-format
#51 opened Feb 17, 2019 by ikreymer
2
Section 8 in conflict with section 6 for warc-fields WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#50 opened Feb 2, 2019 by wumpus
1
'WARC-Identified-Payload-Type' allowed for request, revisit, continuation? WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#49 opened Jan 30, 2019 by wumpus
2
Align digest-value grammar with base16/32/64 alphabets proposal WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#48 opened Nov 26, 2018 by wumpus
6
WARC-Protocol field proposal http/2 proposal warc-format
#42 opened Jul 13, 2018 by ato
28
'conversion' records are underspecified open-problem warc-format
#40 opened Jul 11, 2018 by ato
1
Minor typo in grammar definition for 'token' WARC/1.1-possible-errata warc-format
#39 opened Jul 9, 2018 by ato
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.