Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
""" WalkthroughThis update introduces several new scripts for interacting with and testing DecayingTokenFactory and OwnershipTokenFactory contracts on Ethereum mainnet. It adds their storage layouts to the OpenZeppelin manifest, enhances upgrade scripts with improved validation and error handling, and extends test coverage for the getSpaceToken function. Documentation is updated accordingly. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Script
participant Provider
participant DecayingTokenFactory
participant DAOProposals
participant DAOSpaceFactory
participant VoteDecayTokenVotingPower
User->>Script: Run test-decaying-token-proposal.ts
Script->>Provider: Connect to Ethereum mainnet
Script->>DAOSpaceFactory: Create new space
DAOSpaceFactory-->>Script: Return new space ID
Script->>DecayingTokenFactory: Check getSpaceToken(spaceId)
DecayingTokenFactory-->>Script: Return zero address (no token yet)
Script->>DAOProposals: Submit proposal to deploy decaying token
DAOProposals-->>Script: Return proposal ID
Script->>DAOProposals: Vote on proposal
DAOProposals-->>Script: Confirm vote
Script->>DAOProposals: Execute proposal
DAOProposals-->>DecayingTokenFactory: Call deploy function
DecayingTokenFactory-->>DAOProposals: Emit TokenDeployed event
Script->>DecayingTokenFactory: Check getSpaceToken(spaceId)
DecayingTokenFactory-->>Script: Return deployed token address
Script->>DeployedToken: Query token parameters
DeployedToken-->>Script: Return name, symbol, decay params
Script-->>User: Log results
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts (1)
157-195: Enhance transaction error handling.The transaction handling is functional but could provide more detailed error information for debugging mainnet issues.
Consider enhancing error handling with more specific error types:
} catch (error: any) { - console.error('Error setting decay token factory:', error.message); + console.error('Error setting decay token factory:', error.message); + if (error.code) { + console.error('Error code:', error.code); + } + if (error.reason) { + console.error('Error reason:', error.reason); + } throw error; }packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-ownership-space-tokens.ts (3)
215-235: Consider batch processing for improved performance.The current implementation queries tokens sequentially, which could be slow for large numbers of spaces. Consider implementing batch processing or parallel requests to improve performance.
- // Iterate through all spaces - for (let spaceId = 1; spaceId <= Number(spaceCounter); spaceId++) { - try { - const tokenAddress = await ownershipTokenFactory.getSpaceToken( - spaceId, - ); + // Iterate through all spaces with batching + const batchSize = 10; + for (let i = 1; i <= Number(spaceCounter); i += batchSize) { + const batch = []; + for (let j = i; j < Math.min(i + batchSize, Number(spaceCounter) + 1); j++) { + batch.push(ownershipTokenFactory.getSpaceToken(j)); + } + + try { + const results = await Promise.allSettled(batch); + results.forEach((result, index) => { + const spaceId = i + index; + if (result.status === 'fulfilled') { + const tokenAddress = result.value;
7-10: Document contract addresses for better maintainability.The contract addresses should include comments indicating the network, deployment details, and purpose for easier verification and maintenance.
-// Base Mainnet contract addresses +// Base Mainnet contract addresses - deployed [date] const CONTRACTS = { + // OwnershipTokenFactory proxy contract OWNERSHIP_TOKEN_FACTORY: '0xA1eDf096B72226ae2f7BDEb12E9c9C82152BccB6', + // DAOSpaceFactory contract for space enumeration DAO_SPACE_FACTORY: '0xc8B8454D2F9192FeCAbc2C6F5d88F6434A2a9cd9', };🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
216-235: Consider extracting magic number to a constant.The loop starting from
spaceId = 1uses a magic number. Consider making this configurable or documented.+ const FIRST_SPACE_ID = 1; // Space IDs start from 1, not 0 // Iterate through all spaces - for (let spaceId = 1; spaceId <= Number(spaceCounter); spaceId++) { + for (let spaceId = FIRST_SPACE_ID; spaceId <= Number(spaceCounter); spaceId++) {packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-factory.upgrade.ts (1)
44-54: Good pre-upgrade validation approach.Testing the existence of
getSpaceTokenbefore upgrade helps validate whether the upgrade is needed. However, consider making this test more robust by testing with a known space ID that has a token deployed.- // Test if getSpaceToken function exists (should fail before upgrade if missing) - console.log('\n🧪 Testing current getSpaceToken function...'); - try { - await currentProxy.getSpaceToken(1); - console.log( - '⚠️ getSpaceToken already exists - upgrade may not be needed', - ); - } catch (error) { - console.log('✅ getSpaceToken missing as expected'); - } + // Test if getSpaceToken function exists (should fail before upgrade if missing) + console.log('\n🧪 Testing current getSpaceToken function...'); + try { + // Test with a low-level call to distinguish between missing function vs revert + const result = await currentProxy.getSpaceToken.staticCall(1); + console.log( + '⚠️ getSpaceToken already exists - upgrade may not be needed', + ); + } catch (error: any) { + if (error.code === 'CALL_EXCEPTION' && error.reason?.includes('function selector was not recognized')) { + console.log('✅ getSpaceToken missing as expected'); + } else { + console.log('✅ getSpaceToken exists but reverted (expected behavior)'); + } + }packages/storage-evm/scripts/verify-decaying-token-factory.ts (3)
40-54: Intelligent fallback mechanism for function testing.The low-level call approach is excellent for distinguishing between missing functions and functions that revert. Consider deriving the function selector programmatically for better maintainability.
- // Try low-level call - const functionSelector = '0x1080fa43'; + // Try low-level call + const functionSelector = ethers.id('getSpaceToken(uint256)').slice(0, 10);This makes the code more maintainable and self-documenting.
3-3: Document the proxy address for better maintainability.The hardcoded proxy address should include a comment indicating the network and purpose.
-const PROXY_ADDRESS = '0x299f4D2327933c1f363301dbd2a28379ccD5539b'; +// DecayingTokenFactory proxy address on Base Mainnet +const PROXY_ADDRESS = '0x299f4D2327933c1f363301dbd2a28379ccD5539b';
41-53: Consider making function selector more maintainable.The hardcoded function selector could be more maintainable by computing it from the function signature.
- // Try low-level call - const functionSelector = '0x1080fa43'; + // Try low-level call - getSpaceToken(uint256) + const functionSelector = ethers.id('getSpaceToken(uint256)').slice(0, 10);packages/storage-evm/test/DAOSpaceFactoryImplementation.test.ts (1)
1072-1315: Well-structured test with comprehensive coverage, but consider reducing console output.This new test case provides excellent coverage of the
getSpaceTokenfunction across multiple scenarios:✅ Strengths:
- Tests both before and after token deployment states
- Covers multiple spaces to ensure proper isolation
- Handles edge cases (non-existent space IDs)
- Thorough property verification of deployed tokens
- Proper async/await usage and event parsing
- Good test organization with clear sections
⚠️ Areas for improvement:
- Excessive console logging: While useful for debugging, the extensive
console.logstatements (lines 1077, 1096, 1102, 1117-1135, etc.) may clutter test output in CI/CD environments- Test performance: The detailed logging could slow down test execution
Recommendation: Consider using a test-specific logger or reducing console output to essential information only.
- console.log('\n=== TESTING DECAYING TOKEN FACTORY getSpaceToken ==='); - console.log(`✅ Created space with ID: ${spaceId}`); - console.log(`✅ Space executor: ${executorAddress}`); + // Consider using a test logger or removing verbose console output + // console.log('\n=== TESTING DECAYING TOKEN FACTORY getSpaceToken ===');packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts (1)
48-54: Apply optional chaining for cleaner code.The static analysis tool correctly suggests using optional chaining for a more concise implementation.
Apply this diff to use optional chaining:
for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) { const match = fileContent.match(pattern); - if (match && match[1]) { + if (match?.[1]) { addresses[key] = match[1]; } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 50-50: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts (1)
33-38: Consider making contract addresses configurable.While hardcoding addresses works for test scripts, consider loading them from environment variables or a configuration file for better flexibility across different networks.
Example approach:
const CONTRACTS = { DAO_SPACE_FACTORY: process.env.DAO_SPACE_FACTORY_ADDRESS || '0xc8B8454D2F9192FeCAbc2C6F5d88F6434A2a9cd9', DAO_PROPOSALS: process.env.DAO_PROPOSALS_ADDRESS || '0x001bA7a00a259Fb12d7936455e292a60FC2bef14', // ... other contracts };🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
36-36: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
37-37: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/debug-decaying-factory.ts (2)
6-6: Contract address should be documented and verified.The hardcoded contract address should include a comment indicating what this address represents (network, deployment date, etc.) to aid in verification and maintenance.
-const DECAYING_TOKEN_FACTORY = '0x299f4D2327933c1f363301dbd2a28379ccD5539b'; +// DecayingTokenFactory proxy address on Base Mainnet +const DECAYING_TOKEN_FACTORY = '0x299f4D2327933c1f363301dbd2a28379ccD5539b';🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
40-48: Improve error handling specificity.The error handling truncates the error message which might remove important debugging information. Consider preserving more context while still keeping output readable.
- console.log(`Failed: ${error.message.split('(')[0]}`); + console.log(`Failed: ${error.code || 'UNKNOWN_ERROR'} - ${error.message.substring(0, 100)}${error.message.length > 100 ? '...' : ''}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
packages/storage-evm/.openzeppelin/base.json(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/README.md(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/debug-decaying-factory.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-decaying-space-tokens.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-ownership-space-tokens.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-voting-power-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts(3 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/decaying-token-factory.upgrade.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-factory.upgrade.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/test-upgraded-getspacetoken.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/verify-decaying-token-factory.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/test/DAOSpaceFactoryImplementation.test.ts(1 hunks)path/to/file(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/debug-decaying-factory.ts
6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-decaying-space-tokens.ts
6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-ownership-space-tokens.ts
8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts
36-36: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
37-37: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
834-834: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts
[error] 51-51: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts
[error] 50-50: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🪛 ESLint
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts
[error] 784-784: 'proposalData' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: main
- GitHub Check: deploy-preview
🔇 Additional comments (39)
packages/storage-evm/.openzeppelin/base.json (3)
7457-7461: Storage layout entry correctly defines DecayingTokenFactory allAddresses.The addition of the
allAddressesarray properly documents the contract deployment at the specified address, following OpenZeppelin manifest conventions.
7462-7595: DecayingTokenFactory storage layout properly extends with proposalsContract field.The updated storage layout correctly adds the
proposalsContractfield at slot 4, which is safe for upgradeable contracts as it extends the existing storage without modifying previous slots. This follows the append-only pattern required for safe contract upgrades.
7596-7721: OwnershipTokenFactory storage layout properly defined.The storage layout correctly defines the expected fields for the OwnershipTokenFactory contract:
spacesContractat slot 0votingPowerContractat slot 1isTokenDeployedByFactorymapping at slot 2spaceTokensmapping at slot 3The layout follows OpenZeppelin patterns and is consistent with similar factory contracts in the codebase.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts (1)
140-150: Good ownership verification implementation.The ownership check is well-implemented with proper error handling and clear messaging. This prevents unauthorized transactions and provides helpful debugging information.
path/to/file (1)
1-1: Clarify the purpose of this empty file.This file contains only a blank line. If this is intentionally empty (e.g., a placeholder or required for build processes), consider adding a comment explaining its purpose.
If this file was added unintentionally, it should be removed from the PR.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/README.md (1)
148-152: Documentation update follows established patterns.The addition of upgrade instructions for the Decaying Token Factory is well-formatted and consistent with the existing documentation structure. The command follows the same pattern as other upgrade scripts.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/test-upgraded-getspacetoken.ts (2)
32-34: Good diagnostic messaging for interface issues.The comment about potential interface or override issues provides helpful debugging context for developers investigating failures.
16-16:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify ethers.ZeroAddress compatibility.
The usage of
ethers.ZeroAddressmay not be available in all versions of ethers.js.Ensure that the version of ethers.js being used supports
ethers.ZeroAddress. If using an older version, useethers.constants.AddressZeroinstead:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the ethers version in package.json cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.ethers // .devDependencies.ethers'Length of output: 83
🌐 Web query:
ethers.ZeroAddress ethers.js v6 documentation💡 Result:
Ethers.js v6 includes the
ZeroAddressconstant as part of its standard constants library. This constant represents the Ethereum "zero address" (0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000), which is commonly used in Ethereum development for various purposes.Accessing ZeroAddress in Ethers.js v6
In Ethers.js v6, you can access the ZeroAddress constant directly from the ethers object:
import { ethers } from "ethers"; // Use the ZeroAddress constant const zeroAddr = ethers.ZeroAddress; console.log(zeroAddr); // Outputs: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000The ZeroAddress constant is defined as a string that represents 20 bytes (40 nibbles) of zeros prefixed with "0x"[2]. This is equivalent to the v5
ethers.constants.AddressZerothat was previously used[5].Other Related Constants
Ethers.js v6 provides several other useful constants along with ZeroAddress:
ZeroHash: Represents 32 bytes (64 nibbles) of zeros[2]MaxUint256: The maximum value for a uint256[2]MaxInt256: The maximum value for an int256[2]MinInt256: The minimum value for an int256[2]WeiPerEther: The BigInt value representing 10^18 (number of Wei per Ether)[2]EtherSymbol: The Ether symbol (Ξ)[2]MessagePrefix: A constant for the EIP-191 personal message prefix[2]Migration from v5
If you're migrating from v5 to v6, note that the constants structure has changed. In v5, constants were accessed through
ethers.constants.AddressZero, but in v6, they're available directly from the root ethers object asethers.ZeroAddress[5][8].This is part of the broader changes in v6 where most functionality has been moved to the root package for easier access, along with the shift to modern ES6 features including the use of native BigInt instead of the BigNumber class[4][6].
Citations:
- 1: https://docs.ethers.org/v6/getting-started/
- 2: https://docs.ethers.org/v6/api/constants/
- 3: https://docs.ethers.org/v6/single-page/
- 4: https://docs.ethers.org/v6/migrating/
- 5: https://docs.ethers.org/v5/api/utils/constants/
- 6: https://www.npmjs.com/package/ethers
- 7: ethers-io/ethers.js#4621
- 8: ethers-io/ethers.js#3795
- 9: https://docs.ethers.org/v6/
No action needed:
ethers.ZeroAddressis supported in ethers.js v6.13.5
Verified against the official ethers.js v6 documentation thatethers.ZeroAddressis available and equivalent to the v5ethers.constants.AddressZero.packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/debug-decaying-factory.ts (2)
1-51: LGTM! Well-structured debugging script with good interface discovery approach.The script effectively tests multiple potential function signatures to determine the correct contract interface. The error handling and logging are appropriate for a debugging utility.
Note: The static analysis warning about line 6 being a "Generic API Key" is a false positive - this is clearly an Ethereum contract address (0x299f4D2327933c1f363301dbd2a28379ccD5539b).
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
6-6: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
9-11: Environment variable validation is appropriate.Good practice to validate required environment variables early and provide clear error messages.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-ownership-space-tokens.ts (3)
80-156: Excellent interface discovery implementation with comprehensive validation.The
checkContractInterfacefunction is well-designed with thorough testing of multiple function signatures and proper error categorization. The distinction between non-existent functions and functions that revert is particularly valuable for debugging.
12-18: TypeScript interfaces are well-designed.The interfaces properly define the expected contract methods with correct types. Good practice for type safety.
80-156: Contract interface checking is thorough and well-implemented.The function properly validates contract deployment and tests multiple function signatures with appropriate error handling. The logic correctly distinguishes between missing functions and functions that revert.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-factory.upgrade.ts (8)
19-43: Excellent security validation with proper ownership verification.The ownership check before proceeding with the upgrade is a critical security measure. The error messages are clear and provide actionable information for troubleshooting.
58-99: Robust upgrade logic with intelligent retry mechanism.The try-catch structure that handles missing proxy manifests with force import is well-implemented. This gracefully handles edge cases where the proxy isn't properly tracked in the upgrades manifest.
2-4: Good addition of environment configuration.Adding dotenv configuration allows for better environment management and follows best practices for handling environment variables.
14-18: Excellent logging for upgrade visibility.The detailed logging provides good visibility into the upgrade process, including network information and addresses involved.
30-42: Proper ownership verification enhances security.The ownership check is crucial for upgrade security and prevents unauthorized upgrades. Good error handling with clear messages.
44-53: Smart pre-upgrade function testing.Testing the
getSpaceTokenfunction before upgrade helps determine if the upgrade is actually needed. This prevents unnecessary upgrades.
80-99: Robust retry logic with force import.The fallback mechanism using
forceImportwhen the proxy is not found in the manifest is a good practice for handling edge cases in proxy upgrades.
104-112: Helpful diagnostic information for common issues.The additional debugging hints for ownership and proxy admin issues provide valuable guidance for troubleshooting upgrade failures.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/verify-decaying-token-factory.ts (3)
18-32: Good basic function verification with proper error handling.The verification of core contract functions (
owner()andspacesContract()) provides essential validation that the contract is properly deployed and accessible.
8-10: Clear verification logging provides good visibility.The logging clearly indicates what is being verified and provides useful context about the network and address being used.
19-31: Proper error handling for basic contract functions.The verification of basic contract functions with appropriate error handling follows good practices for contract verification.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-voting-power-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts (1)
170-193: Excellent verification pattern for state changes!The addition of retrieving and verifying the set contract address is a best practice that ensures the transaction succeeded and the state was updated correctly.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/decaying-token-factory.upgrade.ts (2)
19-99: Well-structured upgrade script with excellent error handling!The improvements provide:
- Early ownership validation to prevent failed transactions
- Pre/post upgrade testing of the new
getSpaceTokenfunction- Automatic force import handling when proxy isn't in the manifest
- Clear progress indicators and error messages
This is a robust pattern for proxy upgrades.
100-115: Helpful debugging hints in error handling!The specific error messages for ownership and proxy admin issues will help developers quickly diagnose and resolve common upgrade problems.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/list-decaying-space-tokens.ts (3)
86-165: Robust contract interface detection!The
checkContractInterfacefunction handles uncertainty about the actual function name by testing multiple possibilities. This defensive approach ensures the script works even if the deployed contract uses a different function name than expected.
199-264: Well-designed command-line interface with comprehensive output!The script provides flexibility to query specific space IDs or enumerate all spaces, with a helpful summary that distinguishes between spaces with and without decaying tokens.
272-313: Useful test function for development!Having the
testDecayingTokensfunction available but commented out is a good practice - it allows quick testing during development without affecting normal script execution.packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts (4)
9-30: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.The interfaces provide good type safety for ethers.js interactions and the contract methods.
58-98: LGTM! Minimal ABI with required functions.The ABI includes only the necessary functions for this script, which is a good practice for maintainability.
100-191: Excellent implementation with comprehensive verification.The function includes:
- Proper error handling for missing addresses
- Ownership verification to prevent unauthorized operations
- Post-update validation to confirm success
- Clear user feedback throughout the process
193-198: LGTM! Standard script execution pattern.Proper handling of async execution with appropriate exit codes.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts (5)
1-31: LGTM! Well-defined interfaces and imports.The interfaces provide good type safety for space creation, proposals, and account data.
40-241: LGTM! Comprehensive ABI definitions.All required contract functions are properly defined in the ABIs.
243-366: Excellent event parsing implementation.The functions provide comprehensive event parsing with:
- Detailed logging for debugging
- Proper error handling for decoding failures
- Support for multiple event types
830-836: Hardcoded fallback address needs explanation.The fallback address
0xc8995514f8c76b9d9a509b4fdba0d06eb732907eis hardcoded without explanation. This could cause issues if the test is run in different environments.Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why this specific address is used as a fallback
- Making it configurable via environment variables
- Or removing it entirely if it's test-specific
} catch (error: any) { console.log(`❌ getSpaceToken failed: ${error.message}`); - // Fall back to the known address from events - tokenAddressAfter = '0xc8995514f8c76b9d9a509b4fdba0d06eb732907e'; - console.log(`Using token address from event: ${tokenAddressAfter}`); + // If getSpaceToken fails, we should use the address from the deployment event + // or fail the test gracefully + console.log('Unable to retrieve token address - proposal may not have executed'); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
834-834: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
367-915: Comprehensive test implementation with excellent coverage.The test script thoroughly covers:
- Space creation and membership verification
- Contract configuration validation
- Proposal creation with proper encoding
- Voting and execution flow
- Token deployment verification
- Detailed error handling and debugging output
Great work on the comprehensive test coverage!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
834-834: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 ESLint
[error] 784-784: 'proposalData' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
...ripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| async function main(): Promise<void> { | ||
| // Parse addresses from file | ||
| const addresses = parseAddressesFile(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify all required addresses are available | ||
| const requiredContracts = [ | ||
| 'DecayingTokenFactory', | ||
| 'VoteDecayTokenVotingPower', | ||
| ]; | ||
| const missingContracts = requiredContracts.filter( | ||
| (contract) => !addresses[contract], | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (missingContracts.length > 0) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Missing addresses for: ${missingContracts.join(', ')}`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Connect to the network | ||
| const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(process.env.RPC_URL); | ||
|
|
||
| // Create a wallet instance | ||
| const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY || '', provider); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add environment variable validation.
The script relies on critical environment variables but doesn't validate their presence, which could lead to runtime failures.
Add this validation at the beginning of the main function:
async function main(): Promise<void> {
+ // Validate required environment variables
+ if (!process.env.RPC_URL) {
+ throw new Error('RPC_URL environment variable is required');
+ }
+ if (!process.env.PRIVATE_KEY) {
+ throw new Error('PRIVATE_KEY environment variable is required');
+ }
+
// Parse addresses from file
const addresses = parseAddressesFile();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async function main(): Promise<void> { | |
| // Parse addresses from file | |
| const addresses = parseAddressesFile(); | |
| // Verify all required addresses are available | |
| const requiredContracts = [ | |
| 'DecayingTokenFactory', | |
| 'VoteDecayTokenVotingPower', | |
| ]; | |
| const missingContracts = requiredContracts.filter( | |
| (contract) => !addresses[contract], | |
| ); | |
| if (missingContracts.length > 0) { | |
| throw new Error(`Missing addresses for: ${missingContracts.join(', ')}`); | |
| } | |
| // Connect to the network | |
| const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(process.env.RPC_URL); | |
| // Create a wallet instance | |
| const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY || '', provider); | |
| async function main(): Promise<void> { | |
| // Validate required environment variables | |
| if (!process.env.RPC_URL) { | |
| throw new Error('RPC_URL environment variable is required'); | |
| } | |
| if (!process.env.PRIVATE_KEY) { | |
| throw new Error('PRIVATE_KEY environment variable is required'); | |
| } | |
| // Parse addresses from file | |
| const addresses = parseAddressesFile(); | |
| // Verify all required addresses are available | |
| const requiredContracts = [ | |
| 'DecayingTokenFactory', | |
| 'VoteDecayTokenVotingPower', | |
| ]; | |
| const missingContracts = requiredContracts.filter( | |
| (contract) => !addresses[contract], | |
| ); | |
| if (missingContracts.length > 0) { | |
| throw new Error(`Missing addresses for: ${missingContracts.join(', ')}`); | |
| } | |
| // Connect to the network | |
| const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(process.env.RPC_URL); | |
| // Create a wallet instance | |
| const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY || '', provider); | |
| ... | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-decay-token-factory-in-votedecaytokenvotingpower.ts
around lines 101 to 123, the script uses environment variables RPC_URL and
PRIVATE_KEY without validating their presence, risking runtime errors. Add
validation at the start of the main function to check if process.env.RPC_URL and
process.env.PRIVATE_KEY are defined; if either is missing, throw an error with a
clear message indicating the missing environment variable(s). This ensures the
script fails early with a helpful error instead of failing unpredictably later.
|
|
||
| // Step 5: Check proposal status and wait for execution | ||
| console.log('\n📍 Step 5: Checking proposal status...'); | ||
| let proposalData = await daoProposals.getProposalCore(proposalId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use const instead of let for proposalData.
The variable is never reassigned, so it should be declared as const.
Apply this diff:
- let proposalData = await daoProposals.getProposalCore(proposalId);
+ const proposalData = await daoProposals.getProposalCore(proposalId);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let proposalData = await daoProposals.getProposalCore(proposalId); | |
| const proposalData = await daoProposals.getProposalCore(proposalId); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 784-784: 'proposalData' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/test-decaying-token-proposal.ts
at line 784, change the declaration of proposalData from let to const since the
variable is never reassigned. This improves code clarity and prevents accidental
reassignment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-voting-power-proxy.deploy.ts (2)
14-21: Consider adding deployment parameter validationThe deployment uses
adminAddressas the initializer parameter, but there's no validation that this address is valid or intentional.Consider adding validation before deployment:
+ // Validate admin address + if (!adminAddress || adminAddress === ethers.ZeroAddress) { + throw new Error('Invalid admin address'); + } + const ownershipTokenVotingPower = await upgrades.deployProxy( OwnershipTokenVotingPower, [adminAddress], { initializer: 'initialize', kind: 'uups', }, );
30-35: Enhance error handling with deployment contextThe error handling could be more informative by including deployment context information.
Consider enhancing the error output:
main() .then(() => process.exit(0)) .catch((error: Error) => { - console.error(error); + console.error('Deployment failed:', error.message); + console.error('Stack trace:', error.stack); process.exit(1); });packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/configure-ownership-token-contracts.ts (1)
148-153: Secure environment variable handlingThe RPC URL and private key handling is appropriate with fallback for missing private key, though consider additional validation.
Consider adding validation for required environment variables:
+ if (!process.env.RPC_URL) { + throw new Error('RPC_URL environment variable is required'); + } + if (!process.env.PRIVATE_KEY) { + throw new Error('PRIVATE_KEY environment variable is required'); + } + // Connect to the network const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(process.env.RPC_URL); // Create a wallet instance - const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY || '', provider); + const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY, provider);packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts (1)
117-118: Consider environment variable validationSimilar to the previous script, consider validating required environment variables exist before proceeding.
Add validation for required environment variables:
+ if (!process.env.RPC_URL) { + throw new Error('RPC_URL environment variable is required'); + } + if (!process.env.PRIVATE_KEY) { + throw new Error('PRIVATE_KEY environment variable is required'); + } + // Connect to the network const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(process.env.RPC_URL); // Create a wallet instance - const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY || '', provider); + const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY, provider);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
packages/storage-evm/.openzeppelin/base.json(2 hunks)packages/storage-evm/contracts/addresses.txt(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/README.md(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/configure-ownership-token-contracts.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-voting-power-proxy.deploy.ts(1 hunks)packages/storage-evm/scripts/test-upgraded-getspacetoken.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/storage-evm/contracts/addresses.txt
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/storage-evm/scripts/test-upgraded-getspacetoken.ts
- packages/storage-evm/scripts/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts
[error] 50-50: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/configure-ownership-token-contracts.ts
[error] 57-57: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: deploy-preview
- GitHub Check: main
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/storage-evm/scripts/ownership-token-voting-power-proxy.deploy.ts (1)
1-11: LGTM - Standard deployment setupThe imports and contract factory setup follow standard patterns for OpenZeppelin UUPS proxy deployment.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/configure-ownership-token-contracts.ts (3)
8-21: Well-structured TypeScript interfacesThe interface definitions provide good type safety for ethers.js interactions and clearly define the expected contract methods.
178-203: Excellent ownership verification implementationThe ownership checks for both contracts are comprehensive and provide clear error messages. This is a critical security measure that prevents unauthorized configuration.
205-237: Robust transaction handling with proper error managementThe sequential transaction execution with confirmation waiting and comprehensive error handling is well implemented. The try-catch structure ensures proper error reporting.
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts (4)
8-29: Good interface definitions for type safetyThe TypeScript interfaces provide proper typing for the contract interactions and ethers.js objects.
104-112: Excellent validation of required contractsThe validation logic to check for all required contract addresses before proceeding is robust and provides clear error messaging.
135-145: Strong ownership verification securityThe ownership check prevents unauthorized access and provides clear error messages about permission requirements.
152-189: Comprehensive transaction execution with verificationThe implementation includes proper transaction handling, confirmation waiting, and a verification step to ensure the setting was successful. The address comparison and detailed logging provide excellent transparency.
packages/storage-evm/.openzeppelin/base.json (1)
106-111: New DecayingTokenFactory proxy entry looks correct
The proxy array now includes the address and transaction hash for the DecayingTokenFactory (0xf44ABfc7606cC97794A8E036823d1edd6d34786c), and thekindis set touupsas expected.
...es/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/configure-ownership-token-contracts.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) { | ||
| const match = fileContent.match(pattern); | ||
| if (match && match[1]) { | ||
| addresses[key] = match[1]; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Apply optional chaining as suggested by static analysis
Same issue as in the previous file - static analysis correctly identifies the need for optional chaining.
Apply the suggested fix to use optional chaining:
for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) {
const match = fileContent.match(pattern);
- if (match && match[1]) {
+ if (match?.[1]) {
addresses[key] = match[1];
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) { | |
| const match = fileContent.match(pattern); | |
| if (match && match[1]) { | |
| addresses[key] = match[1]; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) { | |
| const match = fileContent.match(pattern); | |
| if (match?.[1]) { | |
| addresses[key] = match[1]; | |
| } | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 50-50: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
packages/storage-evm/scripts/base-mainnet-contracts-scripts/set-proposals-contract-in-decayingtokenfactory.ts
around lines 48 to 53, the code accesses match[1] without confirming match is
defined, which can cause runtime errors. Update the condition to use optional
chaining by replacing match && match[1] with match?.[1] to safely access the
capture group only if match is not null or undefined.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests