[POC] Named function arguments using @name #1428
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[POC] Named function arguments using
@name
Status: This is a proof of concept only. It does not meet the quality, testing, or design bar for merging into the main repository. The goal is to explore the idea and see whether there is interest in this concept at all.
Summary
Many modern programming languages provide named function arguments. This PR experiments with bringing a similar feature into the cppfront/C++ world. In this proposal, the
@
symbol introduces a name which can then be used, for example, as a named function argument.Syntax (POC)
@name = value
introduces a name-value pair usable at call sites and in lightweight record-like objects.Example file
examples/named_function_arguments.cpp2
demonstrates calling a function with named arguments in any order:It also shows using the same mechanism to create variadic objects:
Question
Would the authors be interested in seeing this concept developed further (with proper design notes, diagnostics, tests, and performance considerations), or should it remain a one-off experiment?