Add .rx.set method

[philippjfr]

Implements #956

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.70%. Comparing base (31f5717) to head (4ad06ec).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #957   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.70%   86.70%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        5151     5153    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         4466     4468    +2     
  Misses        685      685           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[MarcSkovMadsen]

Nice. Remember to document :-)

[maximlt]

@philippjfr is this ready?

[maximlt]

Suggested change

	to ``.rx.value = value``.
	to `.rx.value = value`.

[jbednar]

Are people ok with the linguistic ambiguity between "set" as a collection of items and "set" as "assign"? I find .rx.assign to more obviously indicate the latter meaning, but it's maybe less guessable? I.e. if I think about what I want to do to assign a value, "set" is indeed the word I think of, but then when I encounter .rx.set, I'm not sure which of the two meanings it would be. Happy with whatever other people agree on...

[maximlt]

FWIW I'm fine with the naming of .rx.set (.rx.pipe(set | list | ...) being I believe the correct way to cast).

[MarcSkovMadsen]

I like set because its the term used in React Docs.