MathCoRL - Mathematical Intelligence with Reinforcement Learning

🚀 Comprehensive framework for mathematical reasoning research with dual LLM providers, reinforcement learning, and advanced API tracking

🎯 Dual Research Framework

MathCoRL supports two complementary research directions with comprehensive tracking, evaluation, and dual LLM provider support:

📚 Task 1: Prompting Method Comparison

Compare different prompting techniques for mathematical reasoning:

• Interface: Unified CLI interface with dual provider support
• Methods: FPP, CoT, PAL, PoT, Zero-shot
• Providers: OpenAI (GPT-4o, GPT-4, GPT-3.5) & Claude (3.5 Sonnet, Opus, Haiku)
• Purpose: Evaluate which prompting strategy and provider works best for mathematical problems
• Features: Real-time API tracking, cost monitoring, comprehensive evaluation, interactive mode

🧠 Task 2: In-Context Learning (ICL) Method Comparison

Compare different example selection strategies within Function Prototype Prompting:

• Pipeline: 3-script workflow for end-to-end ICL research
• Methods: Policy Network, KATE, CDS, Random Selection, Zero-shot
• Providers: Full support for both OpenAI and Claude models
• Purpose: Evaluate which example selection strategy works best for in-context learning
• Features: Neural policy networks, multi-objective training, reinforcement learning

🤖 Dual LLM Provider Support

OpenAI Integration

• Models: GPT-4o, GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo (all variants)
• Features: Complete API integration with accurate token counting
• Pricing: Real-time cost tracking with up-to-date pricing
• Status: ✅ Fully supported and tested

Claude Integration

• Models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3 Haiku (all variants)
• Features: Native Anthropic API integration via LangChain
• Pricing: Comprehensive cost tracking for all Claude models
• Status: ✅ Fully supported and tested

Provider Switching

# Use OpenAI (default)
python -m mint.cli solve --method fpp --provider openai --question "What is 15 + 27?"

# Use Claude  
python -m mint.cli solve --method fpp --provider claude --question "What is 15 + 27?"

# Set default provider in environment
export LLM_PROVIDER=claude  # or openai

📊 Supported Research Datasets

Dataset	Domain	Size	Description	ICL k	Both Providers
GSM8K	Elementary Math	8.5K	Grade School Math word problems	2	✅
SVAMP	Arithmetic	1K	Simple arithmetic word problems with variations	2	✅
TabMWP	Tabular Math	38K	Math problems involving tables and charts	2	✅
TAT-QA	Financial QA	16K	Table-and-text QA for financial documents	3	✅
FinQA	Financial Analysis	8K	Complex financial reasoning and calculations	2	✅

Each dataset includes:

• Training set: For candidate generation and policy training
• Test set: For evaluation and comparison
• Cross-provider evaluation: Test with both OpenAI and Claude
• API cost tracking: Monitor usage across providers

🚀 Quick Start

Installation

# Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/your-username/MathCoRL.git
cd MathCoRL

# Install dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

# Configure API keys
cp env.example .env
# Edit .env with your API keys:
# OPENAI_API_KEY=your_openai_key
# ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your_anthropic_key  
# LLM_PROVIDER=openai  # or claude

Task 1: Compare Prompting Methods

# Single problem solving with different methods and providers
python -m mint.cli solve --method fpp --question "What is 15 + 27?" --provider openai
python -m mint.cli solve --method cot --question "John has 20 apples. He gives 8 to his friend. How many are left?" --provider claude
python -m mint.cli solve --method pal --question "Calculate the average of 10, 20, 30" --provider openai

# Dataset evaluation with cross-provider testing
python -m mint.cli test --method fpp --dataset SVAMP --limit 100 --provider openai
python -m mint.cli test --method cot --dataset GSM8K --limit 50 --provider claude
python -m mint.cli test --method pot --dataset TabMWP --limit 30 --provider openai

# Interactive problem-solving mode
python -m mint.cli interactive --provider claude
python -m mint.cli interactive --provider openai

# Monitor API usage across providers
python -m mint.cli stats
python -m mint.cli stats --hours 12 --provider claude
python -m mint.cli export --format csv

Task 2: ICL Example Selection Methods

# Step 1: Generate candidate examples with embeddings
python generate_candidates.py --dataset TAT-QA --n-candidates 100 --provider openai

# Step 2: Train Policy Network for example selection  
python train_policy.py --dataset TAT-QA --epochs 3 --provider claude

# Step 3: Compare ICL example selection strategies
python run_comparison.py --dataset TAT-QA --samples 150 --save-results --provider openai

# Cross-provider comparison
python run_comparison.py --dataset GSM8K --methods policy,kate,cds --samples 50 --provider claude

🔧 Advanced Features

API Tracking & Cost Monitoring

# Real-time usage statistics
python -m mint.cli stats                    # All providers, last 24h
python -m mint.cli stats --hours 12         # Last 12 hours
python -m mint.cli stats --provider claude  # Claude only

# Export detailed usage data
python -m mint.cli export --format csv      # CSV export
python -m mint.cli export --format json     # JSON export

# Generate cost analysis charts  
python -m mint.cli chart --type cost --save
python -m mint.cli chart --type comparison --save
python -m mint.cli chart --type usage --save

Method Comparison Tools

# Compare all prompting methods on dataset
python -m mint.cli compare --dataset SVAMP --limit 50 --provider openai

# Cross-provider method comparison
python -m mint.cli compare --dataset GSM8K --limit 30 --provider claude

# Ablation studies
python run_ablation_study.py --dataset SVAMP --methods fpp,cot,pal
python run_ablation_triple.py --dataset TabMWP --samples 100

Visualization & Analysis

# Generate performance charts
python -m mint.cli chart --type performance --save

# Export results for analysis
python -m mint.cli export --format csv --save-path results/

# View training progress
python -m mint.cli training-history --dataset GSM8K

📈 Research Methodology

Prompting Methods

• FPP (Function Prototype Prompting): Structured reasoning with explicit function calls
• CoT (Chain-of-Thought): Step-by-step reasoning with natural language explanations
• PAL (Program-aided Language): Programming-based problem solving with code execution
• PoT (Program of Thoughts): Algorithmic decomposition with systematic thinking
• Zero-shot: Direct problem solving without examples or special prompting

ICL Example Selection Strategies

• Policy Network: Neural network trained with reinforcement learning for adaptive selection
• KATE (k-Nearest Examples): Semantic similarity-based selection using embeddings
• CDS (Curriculum-based Selection): Progressive difficulty-based example ordering
• Random Selection: Random sampling baseline for controlled comparison
• Zero-shot: No examples baseline for measuring ICL contribution

Cross-Provider Analysis

• Performance Comparison: Accuracy and reasoning quality across OpenAI vs Claude
• Cost Efficiency: Token usage and cost per problem solved
• Method Suitability: Which methods work best with which providers
• Scaling Behavior: Performance changes with different model sizes

🛠️ Technical Architecture

Core Components

mint/                              # Core package
├── cli.py                         # Unified command-line interface
├── config.py                      # Multi-provider configuration
├── tracking.py                    # Universal API tracking
├── core.py                        # FPP implementation
├── cot.py, pal.py, pot.py        # Alternative prompting methods
├── zero_shot.py                   # Zero-shot baseline
├── icrl/                          # In-Context RL components
│   ├── candidate_generator.py     # Training example extraction
│   ├── policy_network.py         # Neural selection model
│   ├── trainer.py                # PPO training implementation
│   └── evaluator.py              # Multi-method evaluation
├── utils.py                       # Evaluation utilities
└── testing.py                    # Testing framework

Multi-Provider Workflow

CLI Interface → Provider Selection → Method Execution → Universal Tracking → Results
     ↓                 ↓                    ↓                   ↓
   User Input    [OpenAI|Claude]    [FPP|CoT|PAL|PoT]    Cost/Token Tracking

🏆 Key Features

Comprehensive Functionality

• ✅ Dual LLM Provider Support: Full OpenAI and Claude integration
• ✅ Universal API Tracking: Accurate cost monitoring across providers
• ✅ Complete Method Suite: 5 prompting methods + 5 ICL strategies
• ✅ Interactive CLI: Real-time problem solving and testing
• ✅ Advanced Visualization: Charts, exports, and analysis tools
• ✅ Reinforcement Learning: Policy network training for example selection
• ✅ Production Ready: Comprehensive logging, error handling, and documentation

Research Capabilities

• 🔬 Method Comparison: Systematic evaluation of reasoning approaches
• 📊 Cross-Provider Analysis: Performance comparison between OpenAI and Claude
• 💰 Cost Optimization: Detailed tracking for budget-conscious research
• 🎯 ICL Research: Advanced in-context learning with neural selection
• 📈 Scalability: Support for large-scale dataset evaluation
• 🔄 Reproducibility: Comprehensive configuration and result tracking

📚 Documentation

Core Documentation

• README_USAGE.md: Complete usage guide for both research tasks
• README_CLAUDE.md: Claude integration setup and usage
• README_TRACKING.md: API usage tracking and cost monitoring
• README_POLICY_NETWORK.md: Policy network architecture and training

Dataset & Evaluation

• README_DATASETS.md: Dataset descriptions and preprocessing
• README_CHARTS.md: Visualization and analysis tools
• USAGE_WITH_TRACKING.md: Practical examples with tracking

Advanced Topics

• REFACTORING_SUMMARY.md: Technical implementation details

🎓 Research Applications

Prompting Research

• Compare structured vs. free-form reasoning approaches
• Evaluate mathematical reasoning capabilities across different LLMs
• Study cost-effectiveness of different prompting strategies
• Analyze reasoning quality and interpretability

In-Context Learning Research

• Investigate optimal example selection strategies
• Study reinforcement learning for demonstration selection
• Compare neural vs. similarity-based selection methods
• Explore curriculum learning effects in mathematical reasoning

Cross-Provider Analysis

• Evaluate reasoning capabilities: OpenAI vs Claude
• Compare cost efficiency across providers and methods
• Study model-specific optimal prompting strategies
• Analyze scaling laws for mathematical reasoning

Cost Optimization Research

• Track accuracy per dollar across methods and providers
• Optimize API usage for budget-constrained environments
• Study token efficiency patterns in mathematical reasoning

🛠️ Configuration Options

Environment Variables

# Provider configuration
LLM_PROVIDER=openai                    # Default: openai | claude
OPENAI_API_KEY=your_openai_key         # Required for OpenAI
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your_anthropic_key   # Required for Claude

# Model selection
OPENAI_MODEL=gpt-4o-mini              # OpenAI model choice
ANTHROPIC_MODEL=claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022  # Claude model choice

# Generation parameters  
TEMPERATURE=0.1                        # Response randomness
MAX_TOKENS=4000                       # Maximum response length

Advanced Configuration

# Programmatic configuration
from mint.config import create_llm_client, get_config

# Create provider-specific clients
openai_client = create_llm_client(provider="openai")
claude_client = create_llm_client(provider="claude")

# Access configuration
config = get_config()
print(f"Current provider: {config.provider}")
print(f"Current model: {config.get_current_model_name()}")

🤝 Contributing

MathCoRL welcomes contributions in:

• New Prompting Methods: Additional structured reasoning approaches
• LLM Provider Integration: Support for new language models
• ICL Strategies: Novel example selection algorithms
• Datasets: Additional mathematical reasoning domains
• Evaluation Metrics: Advanced correctness and efficiency measures
• Cost Optimization: More efficient API usage patterns

📜 License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

---

🚀 Advanced Mathematical Reasoning Research Made Easy!

Whether you're studying prompting techniques, in-context learning strategies, comparing LLM providers, or optimizing research costs, MathCoRL provides comprehensive tools for cutting-edge mathematical intelligence research with full dual-provider support and advanced tracking capabilities.