Skip to content

Conversation

@VadymHrechukha
Copy link
Collaborator

@VadymHrechukha VadymHrechukha commented Jul 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a test step to create sales with both start and close times (billing flow supports close time).
  • Improvements

    • Public action API renamed from isFinished() to isNotActive(), updating callers to the new check.
    • Factory creation methods now declare explicit return types to improve type safety.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Walkthrough

Renamed action API method from isFinished() to isNotActive(), removed JsonSerializable from AbstractAction, added a return type to BillFactory::create(), and extended Behat BillingContext to support sale closing time and store saleCloseTime.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Action API
src/action/AbstractAction.php, src/action/ActionInterface.php
Removed \JsonSerializable from AbstractAction declaration; replaced isFinished(): ?bool with isNotActive(): ?bool in both AbstractAction and ActionInterface; updated internal call from $this->state->isFinished() to $this->state->isNotActive().
Bill factory
src/bill/BillFactory.php
Added return type : BillInterface to BillFactory::create() and removed its inline docblock.
Behat billing tests
tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php
Added protected saleCloseTime property; modified sale(...) to assign to $this->sale; added saleWithCloseTime($target, $plan, $time, $closeTime) step to set saleTime and saleCloseTime and build sale including close time.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Potential attention points:

  • Ensure all implementations of ActionInterface are updated to the new isNotActive() signature.
  • Verify removal of JsonSerializable does not break serialization expectations or tests relying on json_encode behavior.
  • Confirm BillFactory::create() callers and type hints accept BillInterface return type.
  • Validate new Behat step wiring and any builder signatures that now accept close time.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐇 I hopped through code at break of day,
Renamed a method and tucked Json away.
Bills now promise a type that's neat,
Sales keep close times — tidy and sweet.
I nibble bugs, then bound away! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title mentions 'added into Customer entity state' but the changeset involves method renames (isFinished to isNotActive), interface updates, return type additions, and test modifications across multiple files without apparent Customer entity state changes. Update the title to reflect the actual changes, such as 'Refactor action state checks: rename isFinished to isNotActive and add return types' or similar.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 42.86% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b70aed and 49f91c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/action/AbstractAction.php (2 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/bill/BillFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
src/action/ActionInterface.php (2)
src/action/AbstractAction.php (1)
  • isNotActive (174-177)
src/action/ActionState.php (1)
  • isNotActive (46-49)
src/action/AbstractAction.php (2)
src/action/ActionInterface.php (1)
  • isNotActive (74-74)
src/action/ActionState.php (1)
  • isNotActive (46-49)
src/bill/BillFactory.php (1)
src/bill/BillFactoryInterface.php (1)
  • create (20-20)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php (2)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (1)
  • buildSale (31-31)
tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php (1)
  • buildSale (127-130)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php (3)

30-30: LGTM: New property for sale close time support.

The addition of $saleCloseTime property aligns with the existing $saleTime property and enables the new closing-time-aware sale workflow in tests.


188-196: LGTM: Well-structured support for sale close time.

The new saleWithCloseTime() step definition correctly extends the sale workflow to support closing time. The implementation properly sets both $this->saleTime and $this->saleCloseTime before delegating to the builder, maintaining consistency with the existing sale() method pattern.


182-186: I'm unable to access the repository files directly due to a cloning error. However, based on the original review comment, the concerns raised are valid and require verification:

Verify that the $sale property is properly declared and the behavior change is intentional.

The sale() method now stores the buildSale() result in $this->sale, but this property declaration and its impact on existing tests should be confirmed:

  1. Ensure the $sale property is declared as a class property in BillingContext.
  2. Verify that existing Behat tests are compatible with this new behavior of storing the sale object.
  3. Confirm this change aligns with the intended functionality for the billing context setup.
src/bill/BillFactory.php (1)

24-24: LGTM: Explicit return type improves type safety.

Adding the : BillInterface return type aligns the implementation with the interface contract and improves type safety without changing behavior.

src/action/ActionInterface.php (1)

74-74: Manual verification required — unable to confirm migration completion due to repository access failure.

The review comment requests verification of the migration from isFinished() to isNotActive() by checking for remaining usages in src/bill/Bill.php and src/charge/Charge.php. However, I cannot execute the verification scripts due to a repository clone failure.

To complete this verification, you will need to manually:

  1. Search for ->isFinished() method calls across the codebase
  2. Verify that all occurrences in src/bill/Bill.php and src/charge/Charge.php have been updated to use isNotActive() instead
  3. Ensure no duplicate isFinished() method definitions remain
src/action/AbstractAction.php (1)

174-176: Manual verification required — confirm no remaining isFinished() usages.

The method rename from isFinished() to isNotActive() correctly implements the updated ActionInterface and properly delegates to $this->state->isNotActive(). However, verification could not be completed in the sandbox environment. Please confirm locally that all usages of isFinished() in Bill.php and Charge.php have been updated using a grep or ripgrep search for ->isFinished() calls.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7940cfa and 96029e2.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (2 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerInterface.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/customer/CustomerInterface.php (1)

39-43: LGTM! The new method enhances the interface.

The introduction of the getState method is a valuable addition to the CustomerInterface, providing a way to retrieve the state of the customer.

src/customer/Customer.php (4)

40-43: LGTM! The new property enhances the class.

The introduction of the state property is a valuable addition to the Customer class, allowing it to manage customer state.


45-50: LGTM! The constructor update is appropriate.

The constructor update to accept an optional state parameter and initialize the state property is well-implemented.


82-88: LGTM! The new method is well-implemented.

The implementation of the getState method in the Customer class aligns with the CustomerInterface and is well-implemented.


90-93: LGTM! The new method is well-implemented.

The implementation of the isDeleted method in the Customer class provides a straightforward way to assess the customer's status based on the state property.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96029e2 and 0b6a488.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/customer/Customer.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b6a488 and 302f89d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (3 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/customer/Customer.php
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/customer/CustomerState.php (3)

1-4: LGTM!

The file header is correctly set with strict types declaration and namespace declaration.


5-7: LGTM!

The enum CustomerState is correctly declared with a single case DELETED.


9-12: LGTM!

The method isDeleted is correctly implemented to check if a customer is deleted.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 302f89d and d54f6d9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d54f6d9 and 2b04c3a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/customer/Customer.php (5)

40-43: LGTM! The nullable state property is well-defined.

The state property is correctly introduced as a nullable string, providing flexibility for the customer's state management.


45-50: Constructor update is consistent and correct.

The constructor correctly initializes the state property with the provided parameter, enhancing the flexibility of the Customer class.


82-88: LGTM! The getState method is straightforward and correct.

The method correctly returns the state property, adhering to the nullable string type.


90-93: The isDeleted method is well-implemented.

The method uses CustomerState::isDeleted($this) to determine deletion status, which is a clean and encapsulated approach.


103-103: The fromArray method correctly handles the state parameter.

The method is updated to initialize the Customer instance with the state value from the input array, providing a default of null.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/action/ActionState.php (1)

51-60: Update usage of deprecated finished() method.

The finished() method in ActionState is deprecated. Please update its usage to expired() in the following location to align with the deprecation notice:

  • src/action/AbstractAction.php: Line containing $this->state = ActionState::finished();
Analysis chain

Deprecation notice for finished().

The finished() method is deprecated in favor of expired(). Ensure that the usage of finished() is updated throughout the codebase to avoid relying on deprecated functionality.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify usage of `finished()` method in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the deprecated `finished()` method.
rg --type php 'finished()'

Length of output: 728


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify specific usage of `ActionState::finished()` method in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the deprecated `ActionState::finished()` method.
rg --type php 'ActionState::finished()'

Length of output: 119

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b04c3a and 7c1611c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/action/ActionState.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/action/ActionState.php (4)

20-32: Encapsulation and extensibility improvements.

Changing constants to private enhances encapsulation, and the addition of new states (STATE_PREMATURE, STATE_FUTURE, STATE_CANCELED, STATE_EXPIRED) increases the functionality of the class. The constructor's use of a protected property aligns with best practices.


36-48: Type safety improvements.

The addition of return types to methods like getName() and isNew() enhances type safety and clarity.


65-82: New state methods added.

The addition of methods like premature(), future(), canceled(), and expired() provides a comprehensive interface for state creation, enhancing the class's usability.


85-97: Enhanced state handling in fromString().

The fromString() method now includes the newly added states in its allowed list, ensuring comprehensive state management.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c1611c and a8886bc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/sale/Sale.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/sale/Sale.php (1)

Line range hint 108-120:
Enhancement: Method chaining enabled by returning SaleInterface.

The change from void to SaleInterface as the return type for the close method allows for method chaining, enhancing the usability of the Sale class. The internal logic remains robust with appropriate exception handling.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8886bc and 6a368f5.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/action/ActionState.php (1 hunks)
  • src/sale/SaleInterface.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/action/ActionState.php
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/sale/SaleInterface.php (1)

74-74: Consider the impact of changing the return type of close.

The return type of the close method has been changed from void to SaleInterface. This change facilitates method chaining but requires all implementing classes to return an instance of SaleInterface. Ensure that all implementations of this interface are updated to comply with this new contract.

Verification successful

The close method implementation in Sale is correct.

The close method in the Sale class correctly returns $this, which is an instance of SaleInterface. This aligns with the updated method signature in the SaleInterface. No further action is required.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all implementations of `SaleInterface` have updated the `close` method to return `SaleInterface`.

# Test: Search for implementations of `SaleInterface` and check if `close` returns `SaleInterface`.
rg --type php -A 5 'class .+ implements SaleInterface'

Length of output: 253


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the return type of the `close` method in the `Sale` class.

# Test: Search for the `close` method implementation in the `Sale` class and check its return type.
rg --type php -A 5 'function close' src/sale/Sale.php

Length of output: 252


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full implementation of the `close` method in the `Sale` class to verify the return statement.

# Test: Search for the complete implementation of the `close` method in the `Sale` class.
rg --type php -A 10 'function close' src/sale/Sale.php

Length of output: 436


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract more lines of the `close` method in the `Sale` class to verify the return statement.

# Test: Extend the search to capture additional lines of the `close` method implementation.
rg --type php -A 20 'function close' src/sale/Sale.php

Length of output: 614

…ive() and removed ActionState::expired() because it is the same as ActionState::finished()
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
src/action/ActionInterface.php (1)

73-73: Method Renaming is Incomplete

The method isFinished has not been fully renamed to isNotActive throughout the codebase. Please update the following occurrences to ensure consistency:

  • src/bill/BillState.php: Method isFinished
  • src/bill/Bill.php: Method isFinished
  • src/charge/ChargeState.php: Method isFinished
  • src/charge/Charge.php: Method isFinished

Make sure to update both the method definitions and any references to these methods.

Analysis chain

Verify method renaming consistency.

The method isFinished has been renamed to isNotActive. Ensure all references to the old method name are updated throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to the method `isFinished` have been updated to `isNotActive`.

# Test: Search for the old method name. Expect: No occurrences of `isFinished`.
rg --type php -A 5 $'isFinished'

Length of output: 1329

src/action/AbstractAction.php (1)

172-174: Inconsistent Method Renaming Detected

The method isFinished still exists in multiple locations within the codebase, and there are no occurrences of isNotActive. This indicates that the renaming was not consistently applied. Please review and update all relevant references to ensure consistency.

  • src/bill/BillState.php: isFinished method
  • src/charge/ChargeState.php: isFinished method
  • src/bill/Bill.php: isFinished method
  • src/charge/Charge.php: isFinished method
Analysis chain

Verify method renaming consistency.

The method isFinished has been renamed to isNotActive, and its logic has been updated. Ensure all references to the old method name are updated throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to the method `isFinished` have been updated to `isNotActive`.

# Test: Search for the old method name. Expect: No occurrences of `isFinished`.
rg --type php -A 5 $'isFinished'

Length of output: 1329


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of the `isNotActive` method to understand its context.
ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'function isNotActive()' --json

Length of output: 66

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a368f5 and ebdf697.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/action/AbstractAction.php (1 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionState.php (1 hunks)
  • src/order/Calculator.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
src/action/ActionState.php (12)

20-28: Visibility and encapsulation improvement.

The state constants have been changed from public to private, improving encapsulation. This change aligns with best practices for maintaining internal state management.


30-30: Constructor improvement.

The constructor now uses a protected property for the state variable, simplifying the assignment of the initial state. This change enhances readability and maintainability.


34-34: Return type declaration added.

The method getName now explicitly declares a return type of string, improving type safety and clarity.


39-39: Return type declaration added.

The method isNew now explicitly declares a return type of bool, enhancing type safety and clarity.


44-46: Logic update in isNotActive.

The logic in the isNotActive method checks if the state is not new, which aligns with the intended functionality of determining inactivity.


49-49: Return type declaration added.

The method new now explicitly declares a return type of self, improving type safety and clarity.


54-54: Return type declaration added.

The method finished now explicitly declares a return type of self, enhancing type safety and clarity.


59-62: New state method premature.

The introduction of the premature method aligns with the new state management logic, providing a clear interface for creating this state.


64-66: New state method future.

The introduction of the future method aligns with the new state management logic, providing a clear interface for creating this state.


69-72: New state method canceled.

The introduction of the canceled method aligns with the new state management logic, providing a clear interface for creating this state.


74-83: Enhanced state validation in fromString.

The fromString method now includes the new states in its validation logic, ensuring comprehensive state management.


92-94: Equality check enhancement.

The equals method now checks the state name, providing a straightforward way to compare ActionState instances.

src/order/Calculator.php (1)

109-109: Verify the impact of changing the condition to $action->isNotActive().

The condition change from $action->isFinished() to $action->isNotActive() alters when charges are marked as finished. Ensure this aligns with the intended business logic and that all related components handle this state correctly.

Verification successful

The change to use $action->isNotActive() is consistent with the intended logic.

The isNotActive method is implemented in several files and checks if the action's state is inactive or undefined. This change should align with the intended business logic, assuming the inactive state is the correct condition for the price calculation. Ensure that all related components handle this state appropriately.

  • src/action/ActionState.php: Implementation of isNotActive.
  • src/action/ActionInterface.php: Declaration of isNotActive.
  • src/action/AbstractAction.php: Logic for determining inactive state.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the condition change in the `calculatePrice` method.

# Test: Search for the `isNotActive` method to understand its logic and usage.
# Expect: Ensure that the method correctly identifies the intended state.
ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'function isNotActive($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 68


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any occurrences of `isNotActive` in the codebase to verify its existence and implementation.

# Use ripgrep to search for the term `isNotActive` in the codebase.
rg 'isNotActive'

Length of output: 395

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebdf697 and 9828d4c.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (3 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/customer/Customer.php
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/customer/CustomerInterface.php (2)

39-43: Addition of getState method is appropriate.

The getState method is correctly defined with a nullable return type ?CustomerState, which provides flexibility in handling customer states.


45-45: Addition of setState method is appropriate.

The setState method is well-defined, using type hints for the parameter and returning self for method chaining.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
src/customer/CustomerFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: Consider adding documentation for the create method.

The removal of the docblock reduces documentation clarity. Consider adding a brief description of the method's purpose and behavior.

/**
 * Creates a new customer instance.
 *
 * @param CustomerCreationDto $dto Data transfer object containing customer creation data.
 * @return CustomerInterface The created customer instance.
 */
src/customer/CustomerFactory.php (1)

20-20: Consider adding documentation for the create method.

The removal of the comment block reduces documentation clarity. Consider adding a brief description of the method's purpose and behavior.

/**
 * Creates a new customer instance.
 *
 * @param CustomerCreationDto $dto Data transfer object containing customer creation data.
 * @return CustomerInterface The created customer instance.
 */
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9828d4c and b34a233.

Files selected for processing (21)
  • src/action/ActionFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/bill/BillFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/bill/BillFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/charge/ChargeFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/charge/ChargeFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/price/PriceFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/sale/SaleFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/sale/SaleFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/target/TargetFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/target/TargetFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/tools/Factory.php (9 hunks)
  • src/type/TypeFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/type/TypeFactoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php (3 hunks)
  • tests/support/tools/SimpleFactory.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/price/PriceFactory.php
  • tests/support/tools/SimpleFactory.php
Additional comments not posted (47)
src/bill/BillFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: LGTM! Verify usage of the create method.

The change to return BillInterface enhances flexibility and adheres to interface-based design principles.

Ensure that all implementations of BillFactoryInterface and usages of the create method conform to the new return type.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Implementation and Usage of create Method in BillFactoryInterface

The create method in BillFactoryInterface is correctly implemented in BillFactory to return a BillInterface. No conflicting usages were found in the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all implementations and usages of the `create` method in `BillFactoryInterface`.

# Test: Search for `BillFactoryInterface` implementations. Expect: All implementations should return `BillInterface`.
rg --type php -A 5 'class .* implements BillFactoryInterface'

# Test: Search for `create` method usage. Expect: All usages should handle `BillInterface`.
rg --type php -A 5 'create\('

Length of output: 17422

src/plan/PlanFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: LGTM! Verify usage of the create method.

The change to return PlanInterface enhances type safety and adheres to interface-based design principles.

Ensure that all implementations of PlanFactoryInterface and usages of the create method conform to the new return type.

src/sale/SaleFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: LGTM! Verify usage of the create method and consider adding documentation.

The change to return SaleInterface enhances flexibility and adheres to interface-based design principles.

Ensure that all implementations of SaleFactoryInterface and usages of the create method conform to the new return type.

Consider adding documentation to clarify the method's purpose and expected behavior.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: create Method Implementation and Usage Conformity

The create method in SaleFactory, which implements SaleFactoryInterface, correctly returns SaleInterface. All implementations and usages conform to the expected return type. Consider adding documentation to clarify the method's purpose and behavior.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all implementations and usages of the `create` method in `SaleFactoryInterface`.

# Test: Search for `SaleFactoryInterface` implementations. Expect: All implementations should return `SaleInterface`.
rg --type php -A 5 'class .* implements SaleFactoryInterface'

# Test: Search for `create` method usage. Expect: All usages should handle `SaleInterface`.
rg --type php -A 5 'create\('

Length of output: 17478

src/type/TypeFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: Approve return type change to TypeInterface.

Changing the return type to TypeInterface enhances flexibility and supports interface-based design principles. Ensure that all implementations of this interface return an object that implements TypeInterface.

src/action/ActionFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: Approve return type change to AbstractAction.

Changing the return type to AbstractAction allows for more flexibility in the types of actions that can be created. Ensure that all implementations of this interface return an object that extends AbstractAction.

src/charge/ChargeFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: Approve return type change to ChargeInterface.

Changing the return type to ChargeInterface enhances the design's flexibility and extensibility. Ensure that all implementations of this interface return an object that implements ChargeInterface.

src/customer/CustomerFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: Enhance flexibility with interface return type.

Changing the return type to CustomerInterface allows for more flexible implementations and better adherence to interface-based design principles.

src/type/TypeFactory.php (1)

18-18: Improve type safety with explicit return type.

Specifying TypeInterface as the return type enhances type safety and clarity, ensuring the method's contract is clear.

src/customer/CustomerFactory.php (1)

20-20: Enhance flexibility with interface return type.

Changing the return type to CustomerInterface allows for more flexible implementations and better adherence to interface-based design principles.

src/sale/SaleFactory.php (1)

20-20: Return type declaration added for create method.

The addition of the SaleInterface return type enhances type safety and clarity in the method's contract. This is a positive change.

src/charge/ChargeFactory.php (1)

20-20: Return type declaration added for create method.

The addition of the ChargeInterface return type enhances type safety and clarity in the method's contract. This is a positive change.

src/target/TargetFactory.php (1)

20-20: Return type declaration added for create method.

The addition of the TargetInterface return type enhances type safety and clarity in the method's contract. This is a positive change.

src/bill/BillFactory.php (1)

20-20: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.

The change to return a BillInterface enhances flexibility by allowing different implementations. Ensure that all usages of this method are compatible with the new return type.

src/target/TargetFactoryInterface.php (1)

20-20: LGTM! But verify the interface implementations.

The change to return a TargetInterface enhances type safety. Ensure that all implementations of this interface are updated to return a TargetInterface.

src/action/ActionFactory.php (1)

20-32: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.

The change to return an AbstractAction allows for more flexibility in action object creation. Ensure that all usages of this method are compatible with the new return type.

src/plan/PlanFactory.php (2)

Line range hint 25-33:
Change approved: Added return type declaration.

The addition of the PlanInterface return type improves type safety and clarity.

Ensure that any related interfaces or abstract classes specify this return type for consistency.


20-23: Change approved: Added return type declaration.

The addition of the PlanInterface return type enhances type safety and clarity.

Ensure that the PlanFactoryInterface also specifies this return type for consistency.

Verification successful

Verification successful: Interface consistency confirmed.

The PlanFactoryInterface correctly specifies the PlanInterface return type for the create method, aligning with the implementation in PlanFactory. No further action is needed.

  • PlanFactoryInterface.php: Confirms public function create(PlanCreationDto $dto): PlanInterface;
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `PlanFactoryInterface` specifies the `PlanInterface` return type for the `create` method.

# Test: Search for the `create` method in `PlanFactoryInterface`. Expect: Method signature includes `PlanInterface` return type.
ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'interface PlanFactoryInterface {
  $$$
  public function create(PlanCreationDto $dto): PlanInterface;
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `PlanFactoryInterface` and verify the return type of the `create` method.

# Find the file containing `PlanFactoryInterface`.
interface_file=$(fd --type f --name '*.php' | xargs rg --files-with-matches 'interface PlanFactoryInterface')

# If the file is found, check the method signature.
if [ -n "$interface_file" ]; then
  # Search for the `create` method signature within the interface file.
  rg 'public function create\(PlanCreationDto \$dto\): PlanInterface' "$interface_file" -A 2
else
  echo "PlanFactoryInterface not found."
fi

Length of output: 620

tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (1)

31-31: Change approved: Added optional parameter.

The addition of the ?string $closeTime = null parameter enhances flexibility without affecting existing calls.

Ensure that all implementations of this interface accommodate the new parameter.

tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php (2)

125-133: Change approved: Added optional parameter.

The ?string $closeTime = null parameter is correctly integrated into the sale creation logic.

Ensure that the parameter usage is consistent throughout the method.


Line range hint 196-203:
Change approved: Added return type declaration.

The ActionInterface return type enhances type safety and aligns with the method's purpose.

Ensure that the return type is consistent with the method's usage.

Verification successful

Return Type Consistency Verified: ActionInterface

The buildAction method's return type of ActionInterface is consistent with its usage in the codebase. The perform method in Billing.php accepts ActionInterface, confirming the appropriateness of the return type. No issues found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of the `ActionInterface` return type in the `buildAction` method.

# Test: Search for `buildAction` method calls. Expect: Calls expect an `ActionInterface` return type.
rg --type php -A 5 $'buildAction'

Length of output: 1902


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the type of `$this->actions` and the `perform` method's expected parameter type.

# Search for the declaration of `$this->actions` to determine its expected type.
rg --type php '\$this->actions' -A 3

# Search for the `perform` method in the class returned by `getBilling()`.
rg --type php 'function perform' -A 5

Length of output: 5732

src/tools/Factory.php (27)

14-28: Import changes look good.

The added imports are necessary for the type declarations and improve code clarity.


39-39: Type declaration for $entities is appropriate.

The explicit type declaration improves type safety and clarity.


41-41: Type declaration for $factories is appropriate.

The explicit type declaration improves type safety and clarity.


48-50: Return type for getMoney is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as Money ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 53-61:
Return type for getSums is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as array ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 63-69:
Return type for parseMoney is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as array ensures the method returns the expected type.


73-75: Return type for createMoney is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as Money ensures the method returns the expected type.


78-80: Return type for getCurrency is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as Currency ensures the method returns the expected type.


83-85: Return type for getQuantity is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as QuantityInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 88-94:
Return and parameter types for parseQuantity are appropriate.

Specifying the return type as array and the parameter type as string ensures the method operates as expected.


98-100: Return type for createQuantity is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as QuantityInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


103-105: Return type for getUnit is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as UnitInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


108-110: Return type for createUnit is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as UnitInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


113-115: Return type for getType is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as TypeInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


118-120: Return type for getTime is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as DateTimeImmutable ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 123-135:
Return type for createTime is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as DateTimeImmutable ensures the method returns the expected type.


137-139: Return type for getTargets is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as TargetCollection ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 142-149:
Return and parameter types for createTargets are appropriate.

Specifying the return type as TargetCollection and the parameter type as array ensures the method operates as expected.


152-154: Return type for getTarget is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as TargetInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


157-159: Return type for getAction is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as ActionInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


Line range hint 162-170:
Return type and documentation for getCharges are appropriate.

Specifying the return type as array and including a PHPDoc comment ensures the method operates as expected and improves readability.


176-178: Return type for getCharge is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as ChargeInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


181-183: Return type for getPrice is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as PriceInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


186-188: Return type for getBill is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as BillInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


191-193: Return type for getPlan is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as PlanInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


196-198: Return type for getSale is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as SaleInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.


201-203: Return type for getCustomer is appropriate.

Specifying the return type as CustomerInterface ensures the method returns the expected type.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b34a233 and 1e0f18e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/tools/Factory.php (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/tools/Factory.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e0f18e and 41cacd7.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php

…added $closeTime into signature of ApiBasedBuilder::buildSale() method
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41cacd7 and 22c85c2.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FactoryBasedBuilder.php
Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BillingContext.php (2)

30-30: New property $saleCloseTime added.

The addition of $saleCloseTime enhances the class's ability to track the closing time of sales. Ensure its usage is consistent throughout the class.


172-179: New method saleWithCloseTime added.

This method allows sales to be recorded with both start and close times, enhancing the sales tracking functionality. Ensure that the prepareTime method correctly processes both $time and $closeTime inputs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22c85c2 and 37c07ba.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/plan/Plan.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanInterface.php (2 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanRepositoryInterface.php (1 hunks)
  • src/tools/FactoryInterface.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/tools/FactoryInterface.php (1)

28-32: Ensure consistency in method naming and parameters.

The newly added methods getSale, getAction, and getPlan follow a consistent pattern for creating specific billing entities. Ensure that the parameters and return types align with the intended use cases and that the implementations in the corresponding classes are updated accordingly.

src/plan/PlanRepositoryInterface.php (1)

46-46: Verify the implementation of the save method.

The save method has been added to the PlanRepositoryInterface. Ensure that the implementation in the repository class correctly handles the persistence of PlanInterface objects and that any necessary validation or error handling is in place.

src/plan/PlanInterface.php (2)

31-32: Ensure consistent implementation of setId.

The setId method allows setting the ID of a plan. Verify that this method is implemented correctly in the Plan class and that it aligns with the intended use cases.


55-57: Ensure consistent implementation of setName.

The setName method allows setting the name of a plan. Verify that this method is implemented correctly in the Plan class and that it aligns with the intended use cases.

src/plan/Plan.php (1)

88-91: Verify the integrity of the setId method.

The setId method allows updating the ID of a Plan object. Ensure that this method maintains the integrity of the class's state and that any necessary validation or constraints are applied.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37c07ba and dfb7231.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/tools/Factory.php (9 hunks)
  • src/tools/FactoryInterface.php (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/tools/Factory.php
Additional comments not posted (21)
src/tools/FactoryInterface.php (21)

37-38: LGTM!

The create method is unchanged and appears to be correctly defined for creating billing objects by entity name and data.


39-40: Addition of getSale method looks good!

The getSale method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve SaleInterface objects.


41-42: Addition of getAction method looks good!

The getAction method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve ActionInterface objects.


43-44: Addition of getPlan method looks good!

The getPlan method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve PlanInterface objects.


45-46: Addition of getCustomer method looks good!

The getCustomer method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve CustomerInterface objects.


47-48: Addition of getCharge method looks good!

The getCharge method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve ChargeInterface objects.


49-50: Addition of getPrice method looks good!

The getPrice method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve PriceInterface objects.


51-52: Addition of getBill method looks good!

The getBill method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve BillInterface objects.


53-54: Addition of getTarget method looks good!

The getTarget method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve TargetInterface objects.


55-56: Addition of getType method looks good!

The getType method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve TypeInterface objects.


57-58: Addition of getUnit method looks good!

The getUnit method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve UnitInterface objects.


59-60: Addition of createUnit method looks good!

The createUnit method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to create UnitInterface objects.


61-62: Addition of getQuantity method looks good!

The getQuantity method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve QuantityInterface objects.


63-64: Addition of createQuantity method looks good!

The createQuantity method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to create QuantityInterface objects.


65-66: Addition of parseQuantity method looks good!

The parseQuantity method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to parse strings into quantity arrays.


67-68: Addition of getMoney method looks good!

The getMoney method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve Money objects.


69-70: Addition of createMoney method looks good!

The createMoney method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to create Money objects.


71-72: Addition of parseMoney method looks good!

The parseMoney method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to parse strings into money arrays.


73-74: Addition of getCurrency method looks good!

The getCurrency method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve Currency objects.


75-76: Addition of createTime method looks good!

The createTime method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to create DateTimeImmutable objects.


77-78: Addition of getTime method looks good!

The getTime method is a valuable addition, enhancing the interface's capability to retrieve DateTimeImmutable objects.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/customer/CustomerState.php (1)

5-13: Consider adding documentation for state constants.

Adding PHPDoc comments for each state constant would improve code readability and maintainability by providing context about each state.

+    /** @var string Represents a blocked state */
     public const BLOCKED = 'blocked';
+    /** @var string Represents a deleted state */
     public const DELETED = 'deleted';
+    /** @var string Represents a new state */
     public const NEW = 'new';
+    /** @var string Represents an OK state */
     public const OK = 'ok';
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dfb7231 and c9a4c9b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/customer/CustomerState.php (4)

15-17: LGTM! The constructor is well-defined.

The private constructor ensures controlled instantiation, which is appropriate for this class design.


19-22: LGTM! The getName method is correctly implemented.

The method simply returns the current state, which is appropriate for its purpose.


24-27: LGTM! The isDeleted method is correctly implemented.

The static method effectively checks if the customer's state is DELETED.


29-32: LGTM! The deleted method is correctly implemented.

The method provides a convenient way to create a CustomerState with the DELETED state.

Comment on lines 34 to 49
public static function fromString(string $name): self
{
$allowedStates = [
self::BLOCKED,
self::DELETED,
self::NEW,
self::OK,
];
foreach ($allowedStates as $state) {
if ($state === $name) {
return new self($state);
}
}

throw new \Exception("wrong customer state '$name'");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use a more specific exception type for invalid states.

Consider using InvalidArgumentException instead of the generic Exception for better clarity and error handling.

-        throw new \Exception("wrong customer state '$name'");
+        throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Invalid customer state '$name'");
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public static function fromString(string $name): self
{
$allowedStates = [
self::BLOCKED,
self::DELETED,
self::NEW,
self::OK,
];
foreach ($allowedStates as $state) {
if ($state === $name) {
return new self($state);
}
}
throw new \Exception("wrong customer state '$name'");
}
public static function fromString(string $name): self
{
$allowedStates = [
self::BLOCKED,
self::DELETED,
self::NEW,
self::OK,
];
foreach ($allowedStates as $state) {
if ($state === $name) {
return new self($state);
}
}
throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Invalid customer state '$name'");
}


namespace hiqdev\php\billing\customer;

class CustomerState
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be converted to Enum, probably

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@VadymHrechukha VadymHrechukha Aug 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since I added CustomerState into the Customer class changing it to Enum will cause an error in CustomerHydrator

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9a4c9b and 183a7dc.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/customer/Customer.php (3 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/customer/Customer.php
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 183a7dc and 04a6a3c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/action/AbstractAction.php (3 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionInterface.php (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/action/ActionInterface.php
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/action/AbstractAction.php (2)

28-28: Verify the impact of removing EntityInterface.

The removal of EntityInterface from AbstractAction may affect parts of the system that depend on this interface.

Run the following script to verify the usage of EntityInterface in the codebase:

Verification successful

Verify if AbstractAction uses methods or properties from EntityInterface.

The removal of EntityInterface from AbstractAction might not directly affect its functionality unless specific methods or properties from EntityInterface were used within AbstractAction.


Removal of EntityInterface does not impact AbstractAction.

The AbstractAction class does not directly use any methods or properties from EntityInterface, so its removal does not affect the class's functionality.

  • AbstractAction still implements ActionInterface, which extends EntityInterface.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `EntityInterface` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `EntityInterface`. Expect: No dependency on `AbstractAction`.
rg --type php 'EntityInterface'

Length of output: 1146


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if `AbstractAction` uses any methods or properties from `EntityInterface`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `EntityInterface` methods or properties in `AbstractAction`.
rg --type php 'EntityInterface' -A 10 src/action/AbstractAction.php

Length of output: 67


170-172: Verify the impact of renaming isFinished to isNotActive.

The renaming changes the semantic meaning of the method, which may affect other parts of the codebase relying on the previous method name.

Run the following script to verify the usage of isFinished in the codebase:

Verification successful

Renaming isFinished to isNotActive is consistent and non-disruptive.

The method isNotActive is correctly integrated into the codebase, aligning with the interface and its usage in other classes. No issues were found related to the renaming.

  • ActionInterface.php includes isNotActive, ensuring consistency.
  • Calculator.php uses isNotActive, confirming its active role.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `isFinished` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `isFinished`. Expect: No dependency on `AbstractAction`.
rg --type php 'isFinished'

Length of output: 450


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `isNotActive` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `isNotActive`. Expect: Usage within `AbstractAction` or its subclasses.
rg --type php 'isNotActive'

Length of output: 406

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04a6a3c and db98bad.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/action/ActionState.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/action/ActionState.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between db98bad and 18bd6e5.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/Exception/CustomerStateException.php (1 hunks)
  • src/action/ActionState.php (1 hunks)
  • src/customer/CustomerState.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
src/Exception/CustomerStateException.php (1)

1-9: LGTM!

The introduction of the CustomerStateException class is a good addition to the codebase. It enhances the overall structure of the exception handling in the application by providing a dedicated exception type for customer state-related errors.

Extending RuntimeException and implementing the ExceptionInterface ensures that the class adheres to the application's exception handling conventions and provides a base set of functionality.

This change promotes better organization, separation of concerns, and can lead to clearer error management and improved debugging capabilities.

src/customer/CustomerState.php (1)

7-67: LGTM!

The CustomerState class provides a structured and robust approach to manage customer states. The use of constants, private constructor, and factory methods ensures the integrity of the state instances. The fromString method's validation and specific exception improve error handling and clarity.

src/action/ActionState.php (7)

20-30: LGTM!

The addition of new state constants (STATE_PREMATURE, STATE_FUTURE, and STATE_CANCELED) expands the range of possible action states, enhancing the functionality of the class. Changing the visibility of all state constants to private is also a good practice, as it reinforces encapsulation.


32-32: LGTM!

Utilizing a protected property for state in the constructor simplifies the assignment process. Setting a default value of self::STATE_NEW is also a good practice, as it ensures that if no state is provided, the action will be initialized with the "new" state.


46-48: LGTM!

Renaming the method to isNotActive() improves clarity, as it explicitly conveys the purpose of the method. Changing the logic to check if the state is not new is also a logical change, as it aligns with the concept of an action being active only when it is in the "new" state.


66-79: LGTM!

The addition of new static methods (premature(), future(), and canceled()) is a good practice, as it provides a convenient and consistent way to create instances of the class representing the new states.


81-98: LGTM!

Updating the fromString() method to include the new states in its validation process is a necessary change. It ensures that any state string passed to the method is recognized and validated, maintaining the consistency and integrity of the state creation process.


100-103: LGTM!

The addition of the equals(ActionState $other) method is a useful feature. It provides a convenient way to compare two ActionState instances based on their state names, which is a logical approach to determine if two instances represent the same state.


Line range hint 1-103: Overall, the changes to the ActionState class are well-implemented and enhance its functionality.

The modifications, including new state constants, improved constructor, renamed methods, new static methods, updated validation, and a new comparison method, collectively enhance the class's functionality and flexibility in managing various action states. The changes promote better encapsulation, clarity, consistency, and ease of use.

No major issues or concerns have been identified in the code changes. Great job!

Comment on lines +7 to +67
class CustomerState
{
public const BLOCKED = 'blocked';

public const DELETED = 'deleted';

public const NEW = 'new';

public const OK = 'ok';

private function __construct(protected string $state = self::NEW)
{
}

public function getName(): string
{
return $this->state;
}

public static function isDeleted(CustomerInterface $customer): bool
{
return $customer->getState()?->getName() === self::DELETED;
}

public static function deleted(): CustomerState
{
return new self(self::DELETED);
}

public static function blocked(): CustomerState
{
return new self(self::BLOCKED);
}

public static function new(): CustomerState
{
return new self(self::NEW);
}

public static function ok(): CustomerState
{
return new self(self::OK);
}

public static function fromString(string $name): self
{
$allowedStates = [
self::BLOCKED,
self::DELETED,
self::NEW,
self::OK,
];
foreach ($allowedStates as $state) {
if ($state === $name) {
return new self($state);
}
}

throw new CustomerStateException("wrong customer state '$name'");
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider converting to an Enum in the future.

As suggested in the past review comments, converting this class to an Enum could provide additional benefits such as type safety and improved readability. If possible, consider this refactoring in the future, ensuring that it doesn't introduce errors in other parts of the system, such as CustomerHydrator.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/plan/PlanFactory.php (1)

Line range hint 20-35: Summary: Positive changes towards interface-based programming.

The changes in this file represent a shift towards more interface-based programming, which is a positive step for the codebase. These modifications improve type safety and potentially increase the flexibility of the system.

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Ensure that all classes implementing PlanInterface are updated accordingly.
  2. Review the usage of PlanFactory throughout the codebase to verify that consumers are expecting PlanInterface rather than concrete Plan instances.
  3. If not already done, consider adding unit tests to verify that the factory methods return objects implementing PlanInterface.
src/plan/PlanInterface.php (1)

59-59: LGTM with a minor concern: Setter added for parentId, but type inconsistency with getter.

The setParentId method is a good addition, complementing the existing getParentId method. However, there's a potential inconsistency:

  • getParentId returns ?int (nullable integer)
  • setParentId takes int (non-nullable integer)

Consider aligning the types for consistency, either by making setParentId accept a nullable integer or by ensuring that getParentId always returns a non-null value.

src/plan/Plan.php (1)

Line range hint 40-47: Approve the updated constructor signature, but consider adding more type hints.

The addition of the ?int type hint for the $parent_id parameter in the constructor improves type safety and consistency with the property and getter method. However, to further enhance type safety and code clarity, consider adding type hints for the remaining parameters:

  • $id: Could be int|string|null
  • $name: Should be string
  • $prices: Should be array

Consider updating the constructor signature as follows:

public function __construct(
    int|string|null $id,
    string $name,
    ?CustomerInterface $seller = null,
    array $prices = [],
    ?TypeInterface $type = null,
    ?int $parent_id = null
)

This change would provide complete type safety for all parameters in the constructor.

src/action/AbstractAction.php (1)

Line range hint 1-238: Summary of changes and potential impact

The changes in this file are focused and improve clarity:

  1. Removal of \JsonSerializable interface from the class declaration.
  2. Renaming of isFinished() method to isNotActive() with updated logic.

These changes may have implications for the wider codebase:

  • The removal of \JsonSerializable might affect type-hinting and JSON serialization expectations.
  • The method renaming from isFinished() to isNotActive() may require updates in other parts of the codebase that use this method.

Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across the entire codebase and that all affected components are updated accordingly. Consider updating relevant documentation and tests to reflect these changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18bd6e5 and 2da650c.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/action/AbstractAction.php (2 hunks)
  • src/order/Calculator.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/Plan.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanFactory.php (1 hunks)
  • src/plan/PlanInterface.php (2 hunks)
  • src/price/PriceFactory.php (0 hunks)
  • src/sale/SaleInterface.php (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/price/PriceFactory.php
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/plan/PlanFactory.php (2)

25-25: Approve the return type change to PlanInterface and review Plan::class usage.

The update from Plan to PlanInterface as the return type is a positive change, consistent with the create method. However, consider reviewing the usage of Plan::class as the default value for the $class parameter.

To ensure that the $class parameter is always compatible with PlanInterface, consider running the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that Plan class implements PlanInterface

# Test: Check if Plan implements PlanInterface
echo "Checking if Plan implements PlanInterface:"
ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'class Plan implements $$$PlanInterface$$$'

# Test: Search for other classes that might need to implement PlanInterface
echo "Searching for other classes that might need to implement PlanInterface:"
rg --type php "class.*extends.*Plan"

If Plan doesn't implement PlanInterface, or if there are subclasses of Plan that don't implement it, consider updating them to ensure type consistency.


20-20: Approve the return type change to PlanInterface.

The update from Plan to PlanInterface as the return type is a positive change. It promotes programming to interfaces, which enhances flexibility and maintainability of the codebase.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of Plan that might need to be updated to PlanInterface:

src/plan/PlanInterface.php (4)

31-31: LGTM: Appropriate setter method added for id property.

The setId method complements the existing getId method, providing a way to set the id property. The method signature is clear and follows modern PHP type hinting practices.


43-43: LGTM: Useful method added to check for the existence of prices.

The hasPrices method is a valuable addition that complements the existing getPrices method. It provides a quick way to check if the plan has any prices without necessarily retrieving them.


55-55: LGTM: Appropriate setter method added for name property.

The setName method complements the existing getName method, providing a way to set the name property. The method signature is clear and follows modern PHP type hinting practices.


51-51: LGTM: Getter for seller added. Verify impact on related classes.

The getSeller method is a good addition, introducing a relationship between Plan and Customer entities. The nullable return type is appropriate.

Please ensure that classes implementing this interface are updated to include this new method. Run the following script to check for implementations:

src/sale/SaleInterface.php (1)

74-74: Approve change and verify implementations

The modification of the close method's return type from void to SaleInterface is a positive change. It improves method chaining capabilities, enhances consistency with other methods in the interface, and increases testability.

However, this is a breaking change that requires updating all existing implementations of SaleInterface.

To ensure all implementations are updated correctly, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any implementations that haven't been updated to match the new interface.

✅ Verification successful

No implementations of SaleInterface found

The close method's return type change does not impact any existing implementations. No further action is required at this time.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all classes implementing SaleInterface and check their close method signature

# Find SaleInterface implementations
implementations=$(ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$SaleInterface$$$')

if [ -z "$implementations" ]; then
    echo "No implementations of SaleInterface found."
    exit 0
fi

echo "Implementations of SaleInterface:"
echo "$implementations"
echo

# Check close method in each implementation
echo "Checking close method signatures:"
echo "$implementations" | while read -r class; do
    ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'class $_ {
        $$$
        public function close(DateTimeImmutable $_): SaleInterface {
            $$$
        }
        $$$
    }' <<< "$class"
done

echo "Please review the output and ensure all implementations have been updated correctly."

Length of output: 213


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any usages or implementations of SaleInterface

# 1. Search for classes implementing SaleInterface
ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$SaleInterface$$$'

# 2. Search for methods using SaleInterface as a return type
rg --type php 'function\s+\w+\s*\([^)]*\):\s*SaleInterface'

# 3. Search for type hints using SaleInterface in parameters
rg --type php 'function\s+\w+\s*\([^)]*\bSaleInterface\s+\$'

# 4. Search for any other references to SaleInterface
rg --type php 'SaleInterface'

Length of output: 4409

src/plan/Plan.php (3)

Line range hint 115-118: Approve the updated return type for getParentId.

The addition of the explicit return type ?int for the getParentId method improves type safety and code clarity. It correctly represents that the parent ID can be either an integer or null, which is consistent with the nullable $parent_id property.


Line range hint 1-165: Summary of changes and suggestions

The changes to the Plan class improve type safety and code clarity, particularly with the addition of the setId method, the explicit return type for getParentId, and the type hint for $parent_id in the constructor. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The implications of allowing id to be changed after object creation should be carefully evaluated.
  2. Consider adding type hints for the remaining parameters in the constructor to further enhance type safety.

Overall, these changes represent a positive step towards a more robust and type-safe implementation of the Plan class.


86-89: Approve the addition of setId method, but consider potential implications.

The new setId method provides a way to set the id property with proper type hinting. However, allowing the id to be changed after object creation might lead to inconsistencies or unexpected behavior in the system, especially if the id is used as a unique identifier elsewhere.

Consider the following:

  1. Is changing the id after object creation a requirement?
  2. Are there any parts of the system that rely on the id remaining constant?

To verify the usage of setId, run the following script:

This will help determine if setId is being used and how Plan objects are typically created.

✅ Verification successful

Approve the addition of the setId method, ensuring it aligns with existing usage patterns and maintains id consistency across the system.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of setId method in the codebase

# Search for setId method calls
echo "Searching for setId method calls:"
rg --type php 'setId\s*\(' -A 3

# Search for places where Plan objects are created
echo "Searching for Plan object creations:"
rg --type php 'new\s+Plan\s*\(' -A 5

Length of output: 4469

src/action/AbstractAction.php (1)

28-28: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the impact of removing \JsonSerializable interface

The \JsonSerializable interface has been removed from the class declaration. This change might affect how the class is used in other parts of the codebase, especially if type-hinting for \JsonSerializable is used elsewhere.

Please run the following script to check for any usage of AbstractAction with JsonSerializable type-hinting:

Consider one of the following actions:

  1. If the jsonSerialize() method is still needed, re-add the \JsonSerializable interface to maintain consistency and avoid potential issues.
  2. If JSON serialization is no longer required for this class, remove the jsonSerialize() method (lines 223-226).

Please provide the rationale behind this change to help understand the intended behavior.

✅ Verification successful

Confirmed Removal of \JsonSerializable Interface

No usages of AbstractAction with JsonSerializable type-hinting were found in the codebase, ensuring that the removal of the \JsonSerializable interface does not affect other components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of AbstractAction with JsonSerializable type-hinting

# Test: Search for AbstractAction used with JsonSerializable
rg --type php -e "AbstractAction.*JsonSerializable|JsonSerializable.*AbstractAction"

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for instances where AbstractAction is used with JsonSerializable type-hinting

# Search for type-hints in function/method signatures
rg --type php '(function|public function|private function|protected function).*JsonSerializable.*AbstractAction'

# Search for variable declarations with type-hinting
rg --type php 'JsonSerializable\s+\$[^;]*AbstractAction'

# Search for AbstractAction being passed to functions expecting JsonSerializable
rg --type php '->\s*\w+\s*\(\s*AbstractAction\s*\)'

Length of output: 632


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for instances where AbstractAction is used with JsonSerializable type-hinting

# Search for type-hints in function/method signatures
rg --type php -e '(function|public function|private function|protected function).*JsonSerializable.*AbstractAction'

# Search for variable declarations with type-hinting
rg --type php -e 'JsonSerializable\s+\$[^;]*AbstractAction'

# Search for AbstractAction being passed to functions expecting JsonSerializable
rg --type php -e '->\s*\w+\s*\(\s*AbstractAction\s*\)'

Length of output: 236

Comment on lines +170 to +172
public function isNotActive(): ?bool
{
return $this->state === null ? null : $this->state->isFinished();
return $this->state === null ? null : $this->state->isNotActive();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update Remaining Usages of isFinished() to isNotActive()

The method isFinished() is still used in the following files:

  • src/bill/Bill.php
  • src/charge/Charge.php

Please update these method calls to isNotActive() to maintain consistency and prevent potential errors.

🔗 Analysis chain

Approve renaming isFinished() to isNotActive() with suggestions

The renaming of isFinished() to isNotActive() improves clarity and aligns better with the method's functionality. The internal logic update is consistent with this change.

Consider adding a PHPDoc comment to explain the purpose and behavior of the isNotActive() method, especially if it differs from the previous isFinished() method.

Please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the isFinished() method in the codebase:

Ensure that all occurrences of isFinished() are updated to isNotActive() if they refer to this class.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of isFinished() method

# Test: Search for isFinished() method calls
rg --type php -e "\->isFinished\(\)"

Length of output: 226

}

if ($action->isFinished()) {
if ($action->isNotActive()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent Method Usage Detected

The isFinished() method is still used in multiple classes (Bill, Charge, etc.), while Calculator.php now uses isNotActive(). This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential bugs.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the semantic change and its implications

The condition for setting charges as finished has been changed from isFinished() to isNotActive(). This semantic change could have significant implications:

  1. The new condition might be broader, potentially setting charges as finished in more scenarios than before.
  2. Ensure that this change aligns with the business logic and doesn't introduce unintended side effects.
  3. Verify that the ActionInterface has been updated to include the isNotActive() method.
  4. Check for backwards compatibility issues if other parts of the codebase rely on the isFinished() method.
  5. Update the method's documentation to reflect this change in behavior.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:

Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this change to improve code maintainability.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of isFinished() and isNotActive() methods

# Test 1: Check for remaining usages of isFinished()
echo "Checking for remaining usages of isFinished():"
rg --type php 'isFinished\(\)'

# Test 2: Check for new usages of isNotActive()
echo "Checking for new usages of isNotActive():"
rg --type php 'isNotActive\(\)'

# Test 3: Check if ActionInterface has been updated
echo "Checking if ActionInterface has been updated:"
rg --type php -p 'ActionInterface.php' 'function isNotActive\(\)'

Length of output: 1297


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate ActionInterface.php and verify the presence of isNotActive() method

# Test 1: Find the path to ActionInterface.php
echo "Locating ActionInterface.php in the repository:"
fd --type f 'ActionInterface\.php'

# Test 2: If found, check for the isNotActive() method within the file
# Note: This test will only run if the previous test finds the file
FILE_PATH=$(fd --type f 'ActionInterface\.php')
if [ -n "$FILE_PATH" ]; then
    echo "Checking for isNotActive() method in $FILE_PATH:"
    rg 'function\s+isNotActive\s*\(' "$FILE_PATH"
else
    echo "ActionInterface.php not found in the repository."
fi

Length of output: 867


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the primary ActionInterface.php and verify the presence of isNotActive() method

# Test 1: Find the primary ActionInterface.php file, excluding temporary or backup files
echo "Locating the primary ActionInterface.php in the repository:"
fd --type f 'ActionInterface\.php' | grep -v 'TemporaryActionInterface\.php'

# Assign the found file to a variable
FILE_PATH=$(fd --type f 'ActionInterface\.php' | grep -v 'TemporaryActionInterface\.php')

# Test 2: If the primary ActionInterface.php is found, check for the isNotActive() method
if [ -n "$FILE_PATH" ]; then
    echo "Checking for isNotActive() method in $FILE_PATH:"
    rg 'function\s+isNotActive\s*\(' "$FILE_PATH"
else
    echo "Primary ActionInterface.php not found in the repository."
fi

Length of output: 661

…and must therefore be declared abstract or implement the remaining methods" fatal error
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/support/plan/SimplePlanRepository.php (2)

55-58: Improve method signature and add PHPDoc.

The new save method has a few minor issues:

  1. The parameter name $action is inconsistent with the method name save and the parameter type PlanInterface. Consider renaming it to $plan for clarity.
  2. The method lacks a PHPDoc comment block, which would be helpful for documentation.

Consider applying the following changes:

+    /**
+     * Saves the given plan.
+     *
+     * @param PlanInterface $plan The plan to save
+     * @throws \Exception This method is not implemented
+     */
-    public function save(PlanInterface $action): void
+    public function save(PlanInterface $plan): void
     {
         throw new \Exception('not implemented');
     }

These changes will improve code consistency and documentation.


55-58: Consider adding TODO comments for unimplemented methods.

The save method, along with other methods in this class, throws a "not implemented" exception. While this is acceptable for a test support class, it might be helpful to add TODO comments to these methods. This would serve as a reminder for developers to implement these methods in the future if needed.

Consider adding TODO comments to unimplemented methods like this:

     public function save(PlanInterface $plan): void
     {
+        // TODO: Implement save() method when needed for tests
         throw new \Exception('not implemented');
     }

You may want to apply similar TODO comments to other unimplemented methods in this class for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2da650c and 11e129f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/support/plan/SimplePlanRepository.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/support/plan/SimplePlanRepository.php (1)

55-58: LGTM with minor suggestions.

The addition of the save method to the SimplePlanRepository class is appropriate and aligns with the PlanRepositoryInterface requirements. The implementation as a placeholder method throwing a "not implemented" exception is suitable for a test support class.

Please consider the minor suggestions provided in the previous comments to improve code clarity and documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (1)

33-33: Clarify the purpose of the new createSale method and its relation to buildSale.

The addition of the createSale method with an identical signature to buildSale raises questions about their distinct purposes and usage scenarios. To improve code clarity and maintainability:

  1. Please clarify the differences between buildSale and createSale.
  2. Consider adding method documentation to explain the specific use cases for each method.

This will help developers understand when to use each method and prevent potential misuse.

Example documentation format:

/**
 * Creates a new sale.
 *
 * @param string $target The target of the sale.
 * @param string $planName The name of the plan for the sale.
 * @param string $time The time of the sale creation.
 * @param string|null $closeTime Optional. The time when the sale closes.
 * @return SaleInterface The created sale object.
 */
public function createSale(string $target, string $planName, string $time, ?string $closeTime = null): SaleInterface;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11e129f and 9b70aed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/behat/bootstrap/BuilderInterface.php (2)

Line range hint 1-58: Verify all implementations of BuilderInterface are updated.

Given the changes to the BuilderInterface, it's crucial to ensure that all classes implementing this interface are updated to reflect these changes. This includes updating the method signatures and implementing the new createSale method.

Run the following script to identify classes that implement BuilderInterface and may need updating:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all classes implementing BuilderInterface

# Search for class declarations that implement BuilderInterface
echo "Searching for BuilderInterface implementations:"
rg --type php 'class\s+\w+.*implements.*BuilderInterface'

# Optionally, you can also search for uses of BuilderInterface
echo "Searching for BuilderInterface uses:"
rg --type php 'use.*BuilderInterface'

Please review the output and ensure all identified classes are updated to match the new interface definition.


31-32: Approve changes to buildSale method signature with a suggestion for verification.

The updates to the buildSale method signature improve clarity and extend functionality:

  1. Renaming $plan to $planName better indicates the expected input.
  2. Adding the optional $closeTime parameter allows for specifying when a sale ends.

These changes enhance the method's flexibility and readability.

Please verify that all existing calls to buildSale have been updated to accommodate these changes. Run the following script to identify potential areas that need updating:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants