Skip to content

Describe laws for NonDet #317

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@arybczak
Copy link
Member

arybczak commented Apr 6, 2025

Thanks. Can you please retain the single-line comment style?

arybczak added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
Adaptation of #317 that uses
single line comments.
@arybczak
Copy link
Member

Superseded by 4ac38ab.

@arybczak arybczak closed this Apr 30, 2025
@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry for not following up! 🙇

@torgeirsh
Copy link
Contributor

Would it be accurate to say that NonDet essentially is the Effectful equivalent to MaybeT?

@arybczak
Copy link
Member

@torgeirsh Yes, indeed. It looks like it would be good to make a section about this (i.e. what effects correspond to what transformers) in haddocks of the main Effectful module.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants