Update PR data Daily collection (2025-08-02 01:42 UTC) #142
Conversation
WalkthroughThis change updates the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request serves as a routine, automated data refresh for the repository's pull request statistics. It updates both the raw list of individual pull requests and various aggregated metrics, ensuring that the displayed data on PR activity and status is current. The changes primarily involve increments in counts across different categories and adjustments to the list of tracked pull requests.
Highlights
- Automated Data Update: This pull request is an automated update of PR statistics data, generated by GitHub Actions, reflecting the latest state of pull requests.
- Consolidated Statistics Refresh: The consolidated statistics for pull requests, categorized by plugin, repository, state, status, and user, have been refreshed to include the most recent data.
- Individual PR Data Update: The
all_results.jsonfile, which lists individual pull requests, has been updated to reflect current PR statuses, including the removal of some older entries and the addition of new ones.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request contains automated updates to PR statistics data. The changes are confined to JSON data files, reflecting new statistics. I've reviewed the changes and the data appears to be well-formed and internally consistent across the various summary files. I did not find any issues to report.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
data/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json (1)
278-314: Add automated duplicate‐repository guardI ran the suggested duplicate check against
data/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json:jq -r '.[].repository' data/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json | sort | uniq -d # → no output (no duplicates found)No repository names are currently duplicated. To prevent future collisions (mixed hyphens/underscores, differing case, trailing slashes, etc.), consider adding this check (or an equivalent) as part of your CI workflow so any accidental duplicates are caught automatically.
—
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
data/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json (1)
131-140: File is growing hard to audit – consider enforcing deterministic orderingThis table now contains >1 500 entries with no obvious ordering (neither α-numeric nor by count).
A stable order (e.g. alphabetical) would make diffs smaller and human review easier, and would surface accidental duplicates (e.g.bitbucket-pluginvsbitbucket-pullrequest-builder-plugin) immediately.all_results.json (1)
3-15: Duplicate title across different repos – intentional?Two entries share the same title “feat(java): Require Jenkins core 2.492.3 and Java 17” but point to
requests-pluginandtestcomplete-plugin.
If that’s expected (e.g. identical sweeping upgrade PRs) ignore; if not, there may be a mix-up in scraping.data/consolidated/prs_by_plugin.json (2)
1-1506: Switch to an object keyed by plugin for O(1) look-upsThe current
[ {plugin, count}, … ]structure forces linear scans for every read and makes duplication checks manual. Storing the data as a single JSON object keyed by plugin slashes file size, removes the duplication hazard, and speeds up consumers drastically.-[ - { "plugin": "gson-api", "count": 11 }, - { "plugin": "joda-time-api", "count": 9 }, - … -] +{ + "gson-api": 11, + "joda-time-api": 9, + … +}Down-stream code that currently does
for … in arraybecomes a directcounts[plugin].
1-1506: Sort entries for deterministic diffsBecause the file is generated, stable ordering (e.g. primary sort by descending
count, secondary byplugin) eliminates noisy reorder-only diffs and review churn.If the generator already computes counts, add a final
.sort()before serialization:data = sorted(data, key=lambda d: (-d["count"], d["plugin"]))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
all_results.json(1 hunks)data/consolidated/prs_by_plugin.json(25 hunks)data/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json(24 hunks)data/consolidated/prs_by_state.json(1 hunks)data/consolidated/prs_by_status.json(1 hunks)data/consolidated/prs_by_user.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: for the jenkins-pr-collector tool, all prs should be logged, not just those with specific keywords l...
Learnt from: gounthar
PR: gounthar/alpha-omega-stats#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learning: For the jenkins-pr-collector tool, all PRs should be logged, not just those with specific keywords like "odernizer" or "recipe" in the body text.
Applied to files:
all_results.json
📚 Learning: the jenkins-pr-collector should log all prs found, not just the ones with specific strings like "ode...
Learnt from: gounthar
PR: gounthar/alpha-omega-stats#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learning: The jenkins-pr-collector should log all PRs found, not just the ones with specific strings like "odernizer" in the body.
Applied to files:
all_results.jsondata/consolidated/prs_by_repo.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
data/consolidated/prs_by_state.json (1)
3-13: State counts verified against consolidated datasetThe counts in
data/consolidated/prs_by_state.json(OPEN 412, MERGED 285, CLOSED 46) exactly match the breakdown indata/consolidated/all_prs.json, so the summary is correct.data/consolidated/prs_by_user.json (1)
3-9: User tallies updated – LGTM
gounthar→ 488 andjonesbusy→ 250 are reflected consistently across the other consolidated tables.
No further concerns.data/consolidated/prs_by_status.json (1)
3-13: Status counters updated – confirm they reconcile with CI resultsSUCCESS jumped to 369 and UNKNOWN to 85; FAILURE/PENDING unchanged.
If UNKNOWN continues to grow, you may want to inspect the collector to ensure all new workflows report a conclusion.data/consolidated/prs_by_plugin.json (1)
1-1506: Data integrity check passed — no duplicate plugin keys detectedThe case-insensitive scan of
data/consolidated/prs_by_plugin.jsonreturned no duplicate plugin identifiers. You can safely ignore this warning.
gounthar
changed the title
gounthar
force-pushed
the
auto-update-pr-data
branch
from
431524d to
14a589e
Compare
This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
json-libJUnit 5 test updates.