Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change snapshot version numbers to begin with a _bigger_ number. #7682

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Change snapshot version numbers to begin with a bigger number.

In pre-modularization cl/725625326, I had pledged not to bikeshed over this. But it turns out that the number matters to some part of our JDiff pipeline, which has been broken since that CL. (Then I broke it even more by introducing usages of java.io.Serial (cl/726154745), which I've since rolled back externally (cl/726521329).)

We still really should finish setting up japicmp to replace JDiff, but again, I just want to unbreak publishing documentation for releases and snapshots.

(I will still view this as a small bit of evidence that biggest version number is best version number for snapshot purposes :))

RELNOTES=n/a

In pre-[modularization](#2970) cl/725625326, I had pledged not to bikeshed over this. But it turns out that the number matters to some part of our JDiff pipeline, which has been broken since that CL. (Then I broke it _even more_ by introducing usages of `java.io.Serial` (cl/726154745), which I've since rolled back externally (cl/726521329).)

We still really should [finish setting up japicmp](google/error-prone#4311 (comment)) to replace JDiff, but again, I just want to unbreak publishing documentation for releases and snapshots.

(I will still view this as a _small_ bit of evidence that biggest version number is best version number for snapshot purposes :))

RELNOTES=n/a
PiperOrigin-RevId: 726570524
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant