Skip to content

Repository files navigation

OpenFOAM CFD — Laminar Flow Maldistribution Mitigation

Chevron vs Teardrop Sheet Insert Geometries

A comparative CFD study using OpenFOAM 12 (foamRun / incompressibleFluid) to evaluate two sheet insert geometries — chevron and teardrop — for mitigating flow maldistribution in a laminar channel flow.


Problem Statement

Flow maldistribution (non-uniform velocity across a cross-section) reduces the effectiveness of heat exchangers, reactors, and filtration systems. This study evaluates surface-mounted protrusions on a thin sheet as passive flow distributors.


Cases

Case Insert Geometry Description
laminar_sheet_chevron Triangular chevron Sharp apex pointing upstream, 120 mm wide × 200 mm long × 10 mm tall
laminar_sheet_teardrop Biconvex teardrop Streamlined lens shape (intersection of 2 circles r=145 mm), 10 mm tall

Both cases share identical flow conditions:

  • Channel: 200 mm × 1000 mm, height 97 mm
  • Fluid: Air, ν = 1.563 × 10⁻⁵ m²/s
  • Inlet: Uniform U = 0.5 m/s
  • Re ≈ 3.2 (deeply laminar)
  • Mesh: ~142,000 cells (snappyHexMesh, surface refinement level 2)
  • End time: 10 s

Key Results

Metric Chevron Teardrop Winner
Velocity Uniformity Index (γ) 0.7263 0.7269 Teardrop
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) 0.4510 0.4496 Teardrop
Stagnation fraction 7.55% 5.39% Teardrop −29%
Max lateral spread (Ux) 0.099 m/s 0.157 m/s Teardrop +58%
Max vertical mixing (Uz) 0.092 m/s 0.137 m/s Teardrop +50%
Pressure drop 0.122 Pa 0.113 Pa Teardrop −7.4%

→ Teardrop wins 6–1. The streamlined biconvex shape avoids the blunt-body separation wake that the sharp chevron creates, resulting in better lateral redistribution, less stagnation, and lower pressure penalty.


Comparative Plot

Flow Maldistribution Analysis


Full Postprocessing Report

See cfd_maldistribution_report.md for detailed analysis including velocity distributions, pressure field stats, physical interpretation, and design recommendations.


Geometry Files

The insert geometries are defined in OpenSCAD:


Repository Structure

├── laminar_sheet_chevron/       # Chevron insert case
│   ├── 0/                       # Initial conditions (U, p, T)
│   ├── constant/                # Physical properties, mesh
│   ├── system/                  # controlDict, fvSchemes, fvSolution, snappyHexMeshDict
│   └── sheet_chevron.scad       # Insert geometry (OpenSCAD)
├── laminar_sheet_teardrop/      # Teardrop insert case
│   ├── 0/                       # Initial conditions (U, p, T)
│   ├── constant/                # Physical properties, mesh
│   ├── system/                  # controlDict, fvSchemes, fvSolution, snappyHexMeshDict
│   └── teardrop.scad            # Insert geometry (OpenSCAD)
├── cfd_maldistribution_report.md   # Detailed postprocessing report
├── cfd_maldistribution_analysis.png # Comparative plots
└── README.md

Note: Time-step field data (U, p, phi) and zip archives are excluded via .gitignore due to file size.


Software

Author

goatnath — 2026

About

A comparative CFD investigation showing why streamlined teardrop inserts outperform chevrons in mitigating laminar flow maldistribution with lower pressure drop penalties.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages