Add darcy's law and MMS for poroelastodynamics #629
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tch the quadrature order of 1 for other subfields in field 'Poroelasticity auxiliary field'
rezgarshakeri
force-pushed
the
rezgarshakeri/update-darcy-law
branch
from
a3b8b47 to
791e768
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds Kernel/doc and mms tests for poroelastodynamics based on this paper.
The test needs to be run by explicit-implict (or fully implicit #627) method since we have
v_tin the second equation of (150) given in the pylith documentation (inside the darcy fluxqterm) and the LHS of the balance of linear momentum also has\rho_b * v_t