Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade strawberry-graphql from 0.236.0 to 0.243.0 - #34

Open
rjchallis wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-60c5a692ba95f9ca89de77512eb6ede7
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade strawberry-graphql from 0.236.0 to 0.243.0#34
rjchallis wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-60c5a692ba95f9ca89de77512eb6ede7

Conversation

@rjchallis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
openai 1.48.0 requires jiter, which is not installed.
openai 1.48.0 has requirement typing-extensions<5,>=4.11, but you have typing-extensions 4.7.1.
llama-index 0.8.42 requires langchain, which is not installed.
llama-index 0.8.42 requires fsspec, which is not installed.
llama-index 0.8.42 requires tiktoken, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-STRAWBERRYGRAPHQL-8097218

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants