build: Add universal-sierra-compiler dependency

[war-in]

Universal Sierra Compiler will be installed now

[THenry14]

Let's mark as draft until this can be merged 👍

[war-in]

I've done the installation script like the snfoundryup installation script, but it seems that there is a problem with the ubuntu shell. Any thoughts?
https://github.com/foundry-rs/asdf-starknet-foundry/actions/runs/7422540402/job/20198042799?pr=1#step:2:54

[THenry14]

I've done the installation script like the snfoundryup installation script, but it seems that there is a problem with the ubuntu shell. Any thoughts? https://github.com/foundry-rs/asdf-starknet-foundry/actions/runs/7422540402/job/20198042799?pr=1#step:2:54

My bet is that the shell there is either sh or maybe even some kind of noshell. If it's the former, we probably don't have it in install script

[war-in]

I've done the installation script like the snfoundryup installation script, but it seems that there is a problem with the ubuntu shell. Any thoughts? https://github.com/foundry-rs/asdf-starknet-foundry/actions/runs/7422540402/job/20198042799?pr=1#step:2:54

My bet is that the shell there is either sh or maybe even some kind of noshell. If it's the former, we probably don't have it in install script

Do you think we should care then?

[THenry14]

I've done the installation script like the snfoundryup installation script, but it seems that there is a problem with the ubuntu shell. Any thoughts? https://github.com/foundry-rs/asdf-starknet-foundry/actions/runs/7422540402/job/20198042799?pr=1#step:2:54

My bet is that the shell there is either sh or maybe even some kind of noshell. If it's the former, we probably don't have it in install script

Do you think we should care then?

for sh, probably yes - I'd just add it to the install script and call it a day. for others not so much.

[THenry14]

after branch is changed, this is mergeable