Skip to content

Bump jinja2 from 2.9.5 to 2.11.3 #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 16, 2023

Bumps jinja2 from 2.9.5 to 2.11.3.

Release notes

Sourced from jinja2's releases.

2.11.3

This contains a fix for a speed issue with the urlize filter. urlize is likely to be called on untrusted user input. For certain inputs some of the regular expressions used to parse the text could take a very long time due to backtracking. As part of the fix, the email matching became slightly stricter. The various speedups apply to urlize in general, not just the specific input cases.

2.11.2

2.11.1

This fixes an issue in async environment when indexing the result of an attribute lookup, like {{ data.items[1:] }}.

2.11.0

This is the last version to support Python 2.7 and 3.5. The next version will be Jinja 3.0 and will support Python 3.6 and newer.

2.10.3

2.10.2

2.10.1

2.10

Primary changes

Install or upgrade

Install from PyPI with pip:

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from jinja2's changelog.

Version 2.11.3

Released 2021-01-31

  • Improve the speed of the urlize filter by reducing regex backtracking. Email matching requires a word character at the start of the domain part, and only word characters in the TLD. :pr:1343

Version 2.11.2

Released 2020-04-13

  • Fix a bug that caused callable objects with __getattr__, like :class:~unittest.mock.Mock to be treated as a :func:contextfunction. :issue:1145
  • Update wordcount filter to trigger :class:Undefined methods by wrapping the input in :func:soft_str. :pr:1160
  • Fix a hang when displaying tracebacks on Python 32-bit. :issue:1162
  • Showing an undefined error for an object that raises AttributeError on access doesn't cause a recursion error. :issue:1177
  • Revert changes to :class:~loaders.PackageLoader from 2.10 which removed the dependency on setuptools and pkg_resources, and added limited support for namespace packages. The changes caused issues when using Pytest. Due to the difficulty in supporting Python 2 and :pep:451 simultaneously, the changes are reverted until 3.0. :pr:1182
  • Fix line numbers in error messages when newlines are stripped. :pr:1178
  • The special namespace() assignment object in templates works in async environments. :issue:1180
  • Fix whitespace being removed before tags in the middle of lines when lstrip_blocks is enabled. :issue:1138
  • :class:~nativetypes.NativeEnvironment doesn't evaluate intermediate strings during rendering. This prevents early evaluation which could change the value of an expression. :issue:1186

Version 2.11.1

Released 2020-01-30

  • Fix a bug that prevented looking up a key after an attribute ({{ data.items[1:] }}) in an async template. :issue:1141

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [jinja2](https://github.com/pallets/jinja) from 2.9.5 to 2.11.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pallets/jinja/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/pallets/jinja/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](pallets/jinja@2.9.5...2.11.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: jinja2
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jul 16, 2023
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 0 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : No Changes
Size       : +0 -0
Percentile : 0%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.txt : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file No Changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants