Added Scrapegraph #3
Open
+3,077
−2,903
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks a lot for the work on this repo guys! Evaluations are most needed in this field :)
Description
This PR adds:
Scrapegraph ranks first on the
success_rateby a small margin.However the benchmark's is not really a benchmark since the ground truth are not always correct, #1 so the other metrics should be taken with a grain of salt. I've rerun firecrawl to prove my point, it lost 2 points on f1 because yeah ground truth have changed.
Not sure what is the plan here but either we come up with a solution to host the websites for the benchmark so they cannot change or it a non scientific way to evaluate scraping services.
Let me know your thoughts!