Skip to content

Conversation

@pyropy
Copy link
Contributor

@pyropy pyropy commented Oct 29, 2025

Updates FilBeamOperator contract address for dev & calibration environments.

Related to #397

@pyropy pyropy self-assigned this Oct 29, 2025
[env.mainnet.vars]
ENVIRONMENT = "mainnet"
RPC_URL = "https://api.node.glif.io/"
FILBEAM_CONTRACT_ADDRESS = "0x" # TODO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you considered deploying FilBeam operator contract to the mainnet and update the mainnet contract address in the configuration as part of this pull request?

I am fine with leaving such change out of the scope of this PR, as long as there is a GH issue or a check-list item somewhere to remind us about this left-over task.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you considered deploying FilBeam operator contract to the mainnet and update the mainnet contract address in the configuration as part of this pull request?

I don't think that new FWSS contract is deployed on mainnet and we're not able to update the FWSS contract after the operator deployment (configuration is immutable inside FilBeamOperator contract). That being said we're not able to deploy our operator contract until the new mainnet FWSS contract is deployed.

I am fine with leaving such change out of the scope of this PR, as long as there is a GH issue or a check-list item somewhere to remind us about this left-over task.

There is a related issue that tracks configuration updates.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that new FWSS contract is deployed on mainnet

FWSS is deployed on mainnet, see https://github.com/FilOzone/filecoin-services/releases/tag/v1.0.0

@pyropy pyropy requested a review from bajtos November 4, 2025 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants