Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

materialize-s3-iceberg: default to delta updates if config is absent #2350

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

williamhbaker
Copy link
Member

@williamhbaker williamhbaker commented Feb 5, 2025

Description:

Unless the delta updates configuration is explicitly false, we will consider delta updates to be enabled.

Practically speaking the connector only works in delta updates mode, and will error out if this is set to false.

This will allow the materialization to work with a sourceCapture set, with new bindings added an absent configuration value for delta_updates.

Workflow steps:

(How does one use this feature, and how has it changed)

Documentation links affected:

(list any documentation links that you created, or existing ones that you've identified as needing updates, along with a brief description)

Notes for reviewers:

(anything that might help someone review this PR)


This change is Reviewable

Unless the delta updates configuration is explicitly false, we will consider
delta updates to be enabled.

Practically speaking the connector only works in delta updates mode, and will
error out if this is set to false.

This will allow the materialization to work with a `sourceCapture` set, with new
bindings added an absent configuration value for `delta_updates`.
Copy link
Member

@Alex-Bair Alex-Bair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@williamhbaker williamhbaker merged commit 8d2be28 into main Feb 5, 2025
52 of 55 checks passed
@williamhbaker williamhbaker deleted the wb/iceberg-delta branch February 5, 2025 21:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants