Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update remote_receiver.rst #4542

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update remote_receiver.rst #4542

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zd3sf
Copy link

@zd3sf zd3sf commented Dec 28, 2024

Added a reference to software hack that allows for RF bridges to work.

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Added a reference to software hack that allows for RF bridges to work.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The documentation for the remote_receiver component has been enhanced with detailed information about the Sonoff RF Bridge configuration. The update includes clarifications about two approaches for handling RF signals: a hardware hack and a new software hack. The documentation provides configuration examples for both methods, explaining how to use the remote_receiver and remote_transmitter components with specific parameters like tolerance, filter, and idle.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/remote_receiver.rst Updated documentation for Sonoff RF Bridge configuration, including hardware and software hacking approaches for RF signal handling

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jesserockz
  • nagyrobi

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/remote_receiver.rst (2)

486-487: Fix the link formatting and improve clarity.

The link to the software hack could be better formatted using proper RST syntax, and the sentence structure could be clearer.

-    There's also a software `"hack" <https://github.com/mightymos/RF-Bridge-OB38S003>`__ that allows the radio chip to mirror all the voltages to the ESP to do the decoding,
-    rendering the hardware hack uncessary. This software passthrough mode can be used for the OB38S003 (white) and EFM8BB1 (black) sonoff RF bridge. Then use this configuration for the remote receiver/transmitter hubs:
+    There's also a software `hack <https://github.com/mightymos/RF-Bridge-OB38S003>`__ that enables passthrough mode, allowing the radio chip to mirror all voltages to the ESP for decoding.
+    This approach works with both OB38S003 (white) and EFM8BB1 (black) Sonoff RF Bridge variants, making the hardware hack unnecessary. Use this configuration for the remote receiver/transmitter hubs:

491-504: Fix indentation and trailing whitespace.

The YAML configuration block has inconsistent indentation and contains trailing whitespace.

 remote_receiver:
   pin:
     # sonoff and wemos board
     number: GPIO3
     mode:
       input: true
       pullup: false
   tolerance: 60%
   filter: 4us
   idle: 4ms
-       
+
 remote_transmitter:
   pin: 1
   carrier_duty_percent: 100%
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6bb477 and 8ba7d24.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/remote_receiver.rst (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/remote_receiver.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8ba7d24
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/6770312c31b77d00089a19f8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4542--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant