feat(imap) module #143
feat(imap) module #143
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR introduces a full IMAP integration module into the frontline_api plugin by defining new Mongoose schemas/models, wiring them into the application context, and exposing GraphQL types, queries, and mutations to send and fetch IMAP messages. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@uuganaa1007 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThis update introduces IMAP email integration to the backend API. It adds new TypeScript interfaces, Mongoose schemas, and models for IMAP customers, integrations, and messages. GraphQL schema, queries, and mutations are extended to support IMAP operations, including sending emails and retrieving conversation details. The Nodemailer dependency is added for SMTP functionality. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GraphQL API
participant IMAP Message Model
participant Nodemailer SMTP
participant Database
Client->>GraphQL API: Mutation imapSendMail(args)
GraphQL API->>IMAP Message Model: createSendMail(args, subdomain, models)
IMAP Message Model->>Nodemailer SMTP: Send email (SMTP)
Nodemailer SMTP-->>IMAP Message Model: SMTP response
IMAP Message Model->>Database: Save sent message
Database-->>IMAP Message Model: Confirmation
IMAP Message Model-->>GraphQL API: Sent message record
GraphQL API-->>Client: Result (JSON)
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GraphQL API
participant IMAP Message Model
participant Database
Client->>GraphQL API: Query imapConversationDetail(conversationId)
GraphQL API->>IMAP Message Model: Find messages by conversationId
IMAP Message Model->>Database: Query messages
Database-->>IMAP Message Model: Messages data
IMAP Message Model-->>GraphQL API: Formatted messages
GraphQL API-->>Client: Messages list
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to c43f8f1 in 2 minutes and 34 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
694lines of code in18files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
11draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts:6
- Draft comment:
Verify if the unique index on 'email' is intended globally; consider a composite index if emails can repeat across different integrations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid architectural concern - emails that are unique within one integration might repeat in another. However, it starts with "Verify if..." which violates our rules. It's also speculative ("if emails can repeat") rather than definitively pointing out a problem. We don't have enough context about the business requirements to know if this is actually an issue. The comment identifies a potential data modeling issue that could cause problems in a multi-tenant system. Removing it might let a real problem slip through. While the architectural concern may be valid, the comment violates multiple rules - it asks for verification, is speculative, and requires more context about requirements. We should err on the side of removal. Delete the comment since it asks for verification, is speculative, and we lack context to confirm if this is actually a problem.
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:38
- Draft comment:
The selector uses 'status' and 'emails' fields which are not defined in IMapCustomer; verify that this selector matches the customer schema. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a cross-module interaction where the selector is used to query the core.customers module, not the local IMAP module. The schema for core.customers would be defined in the core plugin, not here. Without seeing the core module's customer schema, we can't verify if these fields are valid. The comment is asking for verification without having the full context. The fields could be valid in the core.customers schema, and we don't have access to that schema to verify. The comment might be raising a legitimate concern about cross-module type safety. While type safety is important, this is a cross-module issue that requires knowledge of the core module's schema. Per the rules, we should not keep comments that require more context from other parts of the codebase. Delete the comment since it requires knowledge of the core module's schema to verify, and we're instructed to ignore cross-file issues.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:123
- Draft comment:
Convert 'integration.smtpPort' to a number since nodemailer expects a numeric port. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative, explaining why a conversion is necessary. It doesn't suggest a change or ask for confirmation of intent, nor does it point out a potential issue or improvement.
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:141
- Draft comment:
The attachments mapping uses 'attach.url', but the IMapAttachmentParams interface doesn't define a 'url' field; verify the expected structure of attachment objects. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% 1. This is a new file, so the code change is relevant. 2. The comment points out a potential type mismatch. 3. However, we can't verify if there's actually an issue without seeing the interface definition. 4. The code seems to handle attachments consistently in two different ways for different purposes. 5. Without seeing the interface, we're speculating about a problem that may not exist. I might be too quick to dismiss this - type mismatches can cause runtime errors. However, the code is being used in two places successfully which suggests the interface probably does include url. The fact that we need to see another file to verify if this is an issue means we don't have strong evidence that this comment is correct. We should delete this comment since we can't verify the issue without seeing the interface definition, and the code appears to be using attachments consistently.
5. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/schemas/index.ts:3
- Draft comment:
GraphQL type 'IMap' defines a 'title' field which is not provided in the resolver output; ensure schema and resolver return types are consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% Since this is a new file, we can't see the resolver implementation. Without seeing the resolver code, we can't verify if there actually is a mismatch. The comment is speculative without evidence. Additionally, the comment asks to "ensure" something, which violates our rules about verification requests. The schema-resolver mismatch could be a real issue that causes runtime errors. Maybe we should keep comments about potential type mismatches? While type mismatches are important, we need strong evidence to keep comments. Without seeing the resolver code, we can't verify this claim. The comment also asks for verification rather than pointing out a concrete issue. Delete the comment because it's speculative without evidence and asks for verification rather than pointing out a concrete issue.
6. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/schema/schema.ts:54
- Draft comment:
Typo/lexicographical note: The inserted mutation reference is written as${IMapMutations}. Please verify if the casing is intentional, or if it should be${ImapMutations}to match the module name in the commit message. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
7. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts:1
- Draft comment:
Typographical Error: The interface name 'IMapIntegration' appears to be a typo. Considering this module is for IMAP integrations, you might have intended to name it 'IMAPIntegration'. Please verify and update the naming for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While technically IMAP is an acronym and could be capitalized, IMapIntegration is a valid and readable naming convention. The current name follows common TypeScript/JavaScript naming patterns where only the first letter after 'I' is capitalized. This is more of a style preference than a clear error. The current name is perfectly understandable and functional. The comment might have a point about consistency with the IMAP protocol name. There could be existing code that uses IMAP in all caps. Even if IMAP is typically capitalized, this is a minor stylistic issue that doesn't affect functionality. Both naming conventions are acceptable and commonly used in TypeScript. Delete the comment as it's purely stylistic, doesn't affect functionality, and both naming conventions are acceptable.
8. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts:14
- Draft comment:
Typographical Error: Similar to the above, 'IMapIntegrationDocument' may be a typo. It might be better named 'IMAPIntegrationDocument' if it pertains to IMAP integrations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct that IMAP is typically capitalized, this is a relatively minor naming convention issue. The current name is still clear and understandable. The comment doesn't point out any functional issues or bugs. Renaming would require changes in multiple places and provide minimal value. This seems more like a personal preference than a significant code quality issue. The comment does point out a legitimate inconsistency with standard protocol naming conventions. Consistent naming could make the code slightly more maintainable. While technically valid, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a comment. The current name is clear enough and renaming would create unnecessary churn. Delete this comment as it suggests a minor naming change that provides minimal value and creates unnecessary work.
9. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Typo: There should be a space between 'IMapIntegrationDocument' and the closing brace. Change from{ IMapIntegrationDocument}to{ IMapIntegrationDocument }for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about inconsistent spacing, this is an extremely minor formatting issue. Most teams use automated formatters like Prettier that would fix this automatically. The comment doesn't improve code quality or highlight any actual issues. It's the kind of nitpick that adds noise without value. The spacing inconsistency could theoretically indicate that the author isn't following team coding standards. Maybe there's no automated formatter in place? Even if there's no automated formatter, this level of formatting nitpick is too minor to be worth a PR comment. If formatting is important, it should be enforced through tooling, not manual review. Delete this comment as it's an extremely minor formatting issue that doesn't meaningfully impact code quality.
10. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts:12
- Draft comment:
There is no newline at the end of the file. Please add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to common conventions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having a newline at end of file is a common convention, this is a very minor formatting issue that should be handled by editor configs, linters, or git settings. It doesn't affect functionality and isn't worth a PR comment. Most modern development environments handle this automatically. The newline at end of file does serve a purpose in some Unix tools and could cause issues in some scenarios. Some teams consider this an important standard. While technically valid, this is too minor an issue for a PR comment. It should be handled by automated tooling rather than manual review comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor an issue and should be handled by automated tooling rather than PR comments.
11. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:5
- Draft comment:
Typographical: Consider adding a space after '{' and before '}' for consistency. For example, changeimport { messageSchema} from ...toimport { messageSchema } from .... - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The rules state we should not make purely informative comments or obvious/unimportant ones. This is a very minor style issue that could be automatically fixed by a code formatter. It doesn't impact functionality or code quality in any meaningful way. The inconsistent spacing could indicate that code formatting tools aren't being used properly, which might be worth addressing. Multiple style issues across the codebase could hurt readability. While code style consistency is good, this is too minor an issue to warrant a PR comment. This should be handled by automated tooling like Prettier or ESLint, not manual review comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor and should be handled by automated formatting tools rather than manual review.
Workflow ID: wflow_M5mM8P0vQn8WZxxM
You can customize 
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Import Document from mongoose to type IMapCustomerDocument.
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | |||
| export interface IMapIntegration { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Import Document from mongoose to properly type IMapIntegrationDocument.
| bcc: [emailSchema], | ||
| from: [emailSchema], | ||
| attachments: [attachmentSchema], | ||
| createdAt: { type: Date, index: true, default: new Date() }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Date.now (or a function) for the default value of createdAt instead of new Date(), to ensure the timestamp is set at document creation.
| createdAt: { type: Date, index: true, default: new Date() }, | |
| createdAt: { type: Date, index: true, default: Date.now }, |
|
|
||
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | ||
| pluginName: 'core', | ||
| method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update TRPC call: use method mutation (not query) for updating a customer, as indicated by the inline comment.
| method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query | |
| method: 'mutation', // this is a mutation, not a query |
|
|
||
| const info = await transporter.sendMail(mailData); | ||
|
|
||
| models.ImapMessages.create({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider awaiting the creation of the ImapMessages document to ensure errors are caught.
| models.ImapMessages.create({ | |
| await models.ImapMessages.create({ |
| } from '@/integrations/facebook/db/models/Config'; | ||
|
|
||
| import { | ||
| IMapCustomerModel, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: The interface names for the imap models (e.g. IMapCustomerModel) use Map instead of Imap. For consistency with the filename paths and loader functions (loadImapCustomerClass), consider renaming these to IImapCustomerModel, IImapIntegrationModel, and IImapMessageModel.
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @uuganaa1007 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- In Message.createSendMail, you’re calling models.ImapMessages.create without awaiting it – consider awaiting that promise so the record is persisted before returning.
- Your GraphQL schema defines a
titleon IMap and animapLogsquery, but the resolver for imapConversationDetail doesn’t returntitleand there’s no implementation forimapLogs– update the schema or add the missing resolver fields to keep them in sync. - The TRPC call for updating customers uses
method: 'query'but it’s actually performing a mutation; switch it tomethod: 'mutation'to reflect the true intent of the operation.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 4 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | ||
| pluginName: 'core', | ||
| method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Use 'mutation' method for updateCustomer TRPC call
Since updateCustomer modifies data, use 'mutation' instead of 'query' for the TRPC method.
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const mailData = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Forward cc, bcc, and replyTo fields in mailData
Map the cc, bcc, and replyTo fields from the mutation input into mailData so they are passed to the transporter.
| bcc: [emailSchema], | ||
| from: [emailSchema], | ||
| attachments: [attachmentSchema], | ||
| createdAt: { type: Date, index: true, default: new Date() }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick (bug_risk): Use Date.now instead of new Date() for default
default: new Date() sets the same timestamp for all documents. Use default: Date.now to assign the creation time when each document is created.
| logger: true, | ||
| debug: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 suggestion (security): Disable verbose logging in production
Enabling these flags may log sensitive email data. Make them conditional or disable by default in production.
| logger: true, | |
| debug: true, | |
| logger: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production', | |
| debug: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production', |
|
|
||
| export const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { | ||
| class Message { | ||
| public static async createSendMail( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Align method signature with actual return type
Update the return type to match the returned object, or modify the function to return the created document as specified in the signature.
| const sendMail = await models.ImapMessages.createSendMail( | ||
| args, | ||
| subdomain, | ||
| models, | ||
| ); | ||
| return sendMail; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const sendMail = await models.ImapMessages.createSendMail( | |
| args, | |
| subdomain, | |
| models, | |
| ); | |
| return sendMail; | |
| return await models.ImapMessages.createSendMail( | |
| args, | |
| subdomain, | |
| models, | |
| ); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
| const extractedContent = html.substring( | ||
| startIndex, | ||
| endIndex + '</div><br>'.length | ||
| ); | ||
| return extractedContent; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const extractedContent = html.substring( | |
| startIndex, | |
| endIndex + '</div><br>'.length | |
| ); | |
| return extractedContent; | |
| return html.substring( | |
| startIndex, | |
| endIndex + '</div><br>'.length | |
| ); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
| const extractedContent = html.substring(startIndex, endIndex); | ||
| return extractedContent; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const extractedContent = html.substring(startIndex, endIndex); | |
| return extractedContent; | |
| return html.substring(startIndex, endIndex); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts (1)
3-9: Consider enhancing schema with validation and required fieldsThe customer schema looks good for basic functionality, but could benefit from:
- Making essential fields required (e.g., email)
- Adding email format validation
- Including timestamps to track document creation/updates
- Creating indexes for frequently queried fields
export const customerSchema = new Schema({ inboxIntegrationId: String, contactsId: String, - email: { type: String, unique: true }, + email: { + type: String, + unique: true, + required: true, + match: /^\S+@\S+\.\S+$/ + }, firstName: String, lastName: String +}, { + timestamps: true });backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts (1)
7-13: Add type annotation for the models parameterThe
modelsparameter lacks type annotation, which would improve type safety and code maintainability.-export const loadImapCustomerClass = (models) => { +export const loadImapCustomerClass = (models: any) => { class Customer {} customerSchema.loadClass(Customer); return customerSchema; };Consider using a more specific type than
anyif there's an appropriate interface for the models parameter in the project.backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts (2)
2-2: Add space after type nameThere's a missing space after
IMapIntegrationDocumentin the import statement.-import { IMapIntegrationDocument} from '@/integrations/imap/@types/integrations'; +import { IMapIntegrationDocument } from '@/integrations/imap/@types/integrations';
6-12: Add type annotation for the models parameterThe
modelsparameter lacks type annotation, which would improve type safety and code maintainability.-export const loadImapIntegrationClass = (models) => { +export const loadImapIntegrationClass = (models: any) => { class Integration {} integrationSchema.loadClass(Integration); return integrationSchema; };Consider using a more specific type than
anyif there's an appropriate interface for the models parameter in the project.backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts (2)
1-14: Consider adding field documentation and validation hintsThe
IMapIntegrationinterface defines the structure for IMAP integration settings, but it lacks documentation explaining the purpose of each field, expected formats, and constraints. For better maintainability and developer experience, consider adding JSDoc comments.+/** + * Interface representing IMAP integration configuration + */ export interface IMapIntegration { + /** Inbox identifier */ inboxId: string; + /** IMAP server hostname */ host: string; + /** SMTP server hostname for sending emails */ smtpHost: string; + /** SMTP server port (typical values: 25, 465, 587) */ smtpPort: string; + /** Primary account username */ mainUser: string; + /** IMAP/SMTP authentication username */ user: string; + /** IMAP/SMTP authentication password */ password: string; + /** Current health status of the integration */ healthStatus?: string; + /** Error message if integration is failing */ error?: string; + /** Last successful message fetch timestamp */ lastFetchDate?: Date; }
9-11: Use enums for health status valuesThe
healthStatusfield is typed as an optional string, but it likely has a finite set of possible values. Using an enum would improve type safety and code readability.+/** + * Possible health statuses for IMAP integration + */ +export enum IMapHealthStatus { + HEALTHY = 'HEALTHY', + DEGRADED = 'DEGRADED', + FAILING = 'FAILING' +} export interface IMapIntegration { inboxId: string; host: string; smtpHost: string; smtpPort: string; mainUser: string; user: string; password: string; - healthStatus?: string; + healthStatus?: IMapHealthStatus; error?: string; lastFetchDate?: Date; }backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts (2)
2-11: Consider adding validation for attachment fieldsThe
attachmentSchemalacks validation for required fields and data types. Adding validation would ensure data integrity.export const attachmentSchema = new Schema( { - filename: String, - mimeType: String, - type: String, - size: Number, + filename: { type: String, required: true }, + mimeType: { type: String, required: true }, + type: { type: String }, + size: { type: Number, required: true }, attachmentId: String }, { _id: false } );
13-19: Add validation to email schema fieldsThe
emailSchemalacks validation for email addresses. Adding proper validation would prevent invalid email addresses from being stored.const emailSchema = new Schema( { - name: String, - address: String + name: { type: String }, + address: { + type: String, + required: true, + validate: { + validator: (v) => /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(v), + message: props => `${props.value} is not a valid email address!` + } + } }, { _id: false } );backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts (1)
7-13: Consider making attachmentId required when data is not providedFor the
IMapAttachmentParamsinterface, there's no guarantee that eitherdataorattachmentIdwill be provided. Consider adding validation or documentation to clarify when each field is expected.export interface IMapAttachmentParams { filename: string; size: number; mimeType: string; data?: string; attachmentId?: string; + // Either data or attachmentId should be provided }A better approach would be to create separate interfaces or use a discriminated union type to enforce that either
dataorattachmentIdis present:export interface IMapAttachmentBase { filename: string; size: number; mimeType: string; } export interface IMapAttachmentWithData extends IMapAttachmentBase { data: string; attachmentId?: never; } export interface IMapAttachmentWithId extends IMapAttachmentBase { data?: never; attachmentId: string; } export type IMapAttachmentParams = IMapAttachmentWithData | IMapAttachmentWithId;backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
73-74: Remove redundant blank linesThere are unnecessary blank lines at the end of the file that should be removed for code cleanliness.
}; -backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (2)
4-4: ES Module interop – prefer default import for Nodemailer
import * as nodemailer from 'nodemailer';works only whenesModuleInterop=falseand does not give you proper typings.
WithesModuleInterop=true(default in many TS setups) the correct form is:-import * as nodemailer from 'nodemailer'; +import nodemailer from 'nodemailer';This avoids
nodemailer.default is not a functionruntime errors in Node ≥14.
15-21: Static-only class flagged by linterBiome rightly warns that
Messageis a static-only class. Replace with a plain function helper or an object literal to reduce complexity and bundle size.-const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { - class Message { - public static async createSendMail(…) - } - messageSchema.loadClass(Message); +const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { + async function createSendMail(…): Promise<IMapMessageDocument> { … } + messageSchema.statics.createSendMail = createSendMail; return messageSchema; };backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/schemas/index.ts (2)
11-14: Type accuracy –smtpPortshould beInt
smtpPortis inherently numeric. Exposing it asStringmakes client-side validation harder and invites inconsistent data.- smtpPort: String + smtpPort: IntIf you must allow non-numeric variants, document why.
27-48: Mutation signature drifts from backend implementation
cc,bcc,replyTo,inReplyTo,threadId,referencesare accepted here but ignored increateSendMail.
Either:
- Wire these fields through to
createSendMail, or- Remove them from the schema to avoid misleading API consumers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/package.json(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/mutations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/queries.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/schema/schema.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts(4 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/schemas/index.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (7)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts (1)
IMapIntegrationDocument(14-14)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts (1)
integrationSchema(2-13)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
imapQueries(3-74)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/index.ts (1)
imapMutations(4-4)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (1)
IContext(106-110)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts (1)
IMapCustomerDocument(11-11)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts (1)
customerSchema(3-9)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (6)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts (2)
IMapCustomerModel(4-4)loadImapCustomerClass(7-13)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts (2)
IMapIntegrationModel(4-4)loadImapIntegrationClass(6-12)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (2)
IMapMessageModel(7-13)loadImapMessageClass(15-180)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts (1)
IMapCustomerDocument(11-11)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts (1)
IMapIntegrationDocument(14-14)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts (1)
IMapMessageDocument(28-28)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (1)
IContext(106-110)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/schemas/index.ts (3)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/schema/schema.ts (3)
types(33-40)queries(41-47)mutations(49-55)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
queries(7-13)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/mutations.ts (1)
mutations(6-12)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
[error] 16-175: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/package.json (1)
20-20:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify the nodemailer version compatibility
The specified version
^7.0.3appears to be newer than what was widely available as of April 2024 (when the latest stable version was in the 6.x range). Please verify that this version exists and is compatible with your project requirements.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest stable version of nodemailer npm package?💡 Result:
The latest stable version of the Nodemailer npm package is 7.0.3, which was published on May 8, 2025[1][6][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://www.npmjs.com/package/nodemailer
- 2: https://nodemailer.com
- 3: https://mailtrap.io/blog/sending-emails-with-nodemailer/
- 4: https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
- 5: https://mailtrap.io/blog/nodemailer-gmail/
- 6: https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/releases
- 7: https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/nodemailer
- 8: https://community.nodemailer.com/category/releases/
- 9: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@tryghost/nodemailer
- 10: https://nodejs.org/en/about/previous-releases
Verified: nodemailer@^7.0.3 is valid
The version 7.0.3 is the latest stable Nodemailer release (published May 8, 2025), so specifying"nodemailer": "^7.0.3"is correct.backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/index.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean resolver organizationThe file follows good practices by separating IMAP resolvers into queries and mutations, then aggregating them in this index file for easy import elsewhere.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/queries.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Proper integration with existing query resolversThe import and integration of IMAP queries follows the established pattern in the codebase, maintaining consistency with how other domain queries are organized.
Also applies to: 11-12
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/resolvers/mutations.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Proper integration with existing mutation resolversThe import and integration of IMAP mutations follows the established pattern in the codebase, maintaining consistency with how other domain mutations are organized.
Also applies to: 10-11
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/apollo/schema/schema.ts (4)
26-32: LGTM: Clean schema integrationThe IMAP schema integration follows the existing pattern consistently.
39-39: LGTM: Proper schema type inclusionThe IMAP types are correctly integrated with the existing schema types.
46-46: LGTM: Proper query inclusionThe IMAP queries are correctly integrated with the existing schema queries.
54-54: LGTM: Proper mutation inclusionThe IMAP mutations are correctly integrated with the existing schema mutations.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts (2)
2-9: LGTM - Well-structured interface definitionThe
IMapCustomerinterface is well-defined with clear required and optional fields that follow a logical structure for customer data in an IMAP integration.
11-11: LGTM - Proper document interface extensionCorrectly extends both the base interface and Mongoose's Document interface, following the standard pattern for Mongoose model definitions.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM - Proper imports and type definitionThe imports and type definition for the Mongoose model are correctly structured.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (4)
9-11: LGTM - Proper imports for IMAP typesThe imports for the IMAP document interfaces are correctly added.
74-85: LGTM - Well-structured imports for IMAP modelsThe imports for the IMAP model types and class loaders follow the same pattern as other integrations in the file.
101-103: LGTM - Proper interface extensionThe
IModelsinterface is correctly extended with the new IMAP model types.
183-196: LGTM - Proper model registrationThe IMAP models are correctly registered following the same pattern as other models in the file.
| export const integrationSchema = new Schema({ | ||
| inboxId: String, | ||
| host: String, | ||
| smtpHost: String, | ||
| smtpPort: String, | ||
| mainUser: String, | ||
| user: String, | ||
| password: String, | ||
| healthStatus: String, | ||
| error: String, | ||
| lastFetchDate: Date | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security concern: password stored as plain text
The integration schema stores the password as plain text, which is a security risk. Consider:
- Encrypting the password field
- Making critical fields required
- Adding validation for fields like smtpPort
- Including timestamps for tracking
export const integrationSchema = new Schema({
- inboxId: String,
+ inboxId: { type: String, required: true },
- host: String,
+ host: { type: String, required: true },
- smtpHost: String,
+ smtpHost: { type: String, required: true },
- smtpPort: String,
+ smtpPort: {
+ type: String,
+ required: true,
+ validate: {
+ validator: (v: string) => /^\d+$/.test(v) && parseInt(v) > 0 && parseInt(v) <= 65535,
+ message: 'smtpPort must be a valid port number'
+ }
+ },
mainUser: String,
- user: String,
+ user: { type: String, required: true },
- password: String,
+ password: { type: String, required: true },
healthStatus: String,
error: String,
lastFetchDate: Date
+}, {
+ timestamps: true
});Additionally, consider implementing password encryption either through:
- A pre-save hook that encrypts the password
- A separate service for securely managing credentials
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts
lines 2 to 13, the password field is stored as plain text, posing a security
risk. To fix this, implement encryption for the password field using a pre-save
hook in the schema that encrypts the password before saving. Also, update the
schema to make critical fields like password and smtpPort required, add
validation to smtpPort to ensure it is a valid number, and enable timestamps in
the schema options to track creation and update times.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| smtpPort: string; | ||
| mainUser: string; | ||
| user: string; | ||
| password: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Store credentials securely
The interface stores sensitive data like password as plain text. This could pose a security risk if database records are exposed.
Consider implementing credential encryption at rest. One approach is to use environment-specific encryption keys to encrypt sensitive fields before storage and decrypt when needed.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other sensitive fields are stored securely in the codebase
echo "Checking for credential storage patterns in the codebase..."
rg -i "password.*string|secret.*string|token.*string" --type tsLength of output: 16805
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
echo "Inspecting IMAP integration DB definitions around 'password'..."
rg -A 5 -n "password" backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts
echo
echo "Searching for any encryption-related code or libraries in the repo..."
rg -i --context 3 "encrypt" .Length of output: 2149
Encrypt IMAP integration credentials at rest
The IMAP integration’s password (and similar sensitive fields) are currently defined and stored as plain strings with no encryption layer applied:
• backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts
password: string;• backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts
password: String,Our searches (rg -i encrypt) show no encryption implementation in the repo beyond lockfile entries and a frontend ENCRYPTION_KEY constant. To protect these credentials:
- Adopt field-level encryption, for example:
– Mongoose plugins (e.g., mongoose-field-encryption)
– MongoDB Client-Side Field Level Encryption (mongodb-client-encryption) - Store and rotate encryption keys via secured environment variables (e.g.,
ENCRYPTION_KEY). - Encrypt IMAP credentials before persisting and decrypt on read in the integration service.
- Cover key-rotation, error handling, and decryption-failure scenarios in tests and docs.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts
around lines 5 to 8, the password and other sensitive fields are currently typed
as plain strings, which means they are stored without encryption. To fix this,
implement field-level encryption for these sensitive fields by integrating an
encryption mechanism such as a Mongoose encryption plugin or MongoDB client-side
field-level encryption. Modify the data handling logic to encrypt these fields
before saving to the database and decrypt them when reading, using
environment-secured encryption keys. Also, ensure to handle key rotation, error
cases, and decryption failures appropriately in your service and tests.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | ||
| pluginName: 'core', | ||
| method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query | ||
| module: 'customers', | ||
| action: 'updateCustomer', | ||
| input: { selector }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrong RPC method verb – will hit the READ endpoint
The comment says “this is a mutation, not a query”, but method: 'query' is still passed, so the core service will treat it as a read. Change to 'mutation' (or align comment).
- method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query
+ method: 'mutation',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | |
| pluginName: 'core', | |
| method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query | |
| module: 'customers', | |
| action: 'updateCustomer', | |
| input: { selector }, | |
| }); | |
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | |
| pluginName: 'core', | |
| - method: 'query', // this is a mutation, not a query | |
| + method: 'mutation', | |
| module: 'customers', | |
| action: 'updateCustomer', | |
| input: { selector }, | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
around lines 49 to 55, the RPC call incorrectly uses method: 'query' while the
comment states it is a mutation. Change the method value from 'query' to
'mutation' to ensure the core service treats this as a mutation and hits the
correct endpoint.
| const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({ | ||
| host: integration.smtpHost, | ||
| port: integration.smtpPort, | ||
| secure: true, | ||
| logger: true, | ||
| debug: true, | ||
| auth: { | ||
| user: integration.mainUser || integration.user, | ||
| pass: integration.password | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Hard-coded secure: true may break STARTTLS ports
Setting secure: true forces SMTPS on port 465. If the integration is on 587/25 with STARTTLS, sending will fail. Either derive secure from integration.smtpPort (465 → true) or let callers specify it.
Ensure secure aligns with the SMTP port
Hard-coding secure: true forces an SSL/TLS connection (SMTPS) on every port, which will fail on STARTTLS ports (e.g. 587 or 25). Update the transporter configuration to derive secure from integration.smtpPort or allow it to be specified in the integration settings:
• File: backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (around lines 122–132)
• Replace:
- secure: true,
+ secure: integration.smtpPort === 465,• Or extend the integration model to include a smtpSecure boolean and use:
secure: integration.smtpSecure,This ensures SMTPS is used only on port 465 and STARTTLS on others.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
around lines 122 to 132, the transporter configuration hard-codes secure: true,
which forces SMTPS on all ports and breaks STARTTLS on ports like 587 or 25. Fix
this by deriving the secure value based on integration.smtpPort (set secure to
true only if smtpPort is 465) or by extending the integration model to include a
smtpSecure boolean and use that value for secure. This ensures the correct
security mode is used depending on the SMTP port or integration settings.
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed a01331b in 2 minutes and 13 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
250lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
14draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:164
- Draft comment:
Return value mismatch: createSendMail should return an IIMapMessageDocument but currently returns an object with { info }. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:116
- Draft comment:
Ensure smtpPort is a number; convert integration.smtpPort if necessary. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:135
- Draft comment:
Attachment mapping uses 'attach.url', but the attachment interface lacks a 'url' field. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts:101
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: The type name 'IIMapCustomerModel' might contain an extra 'I'. Confirm if the intended name was 'IImapCustomerModel' (or similar) for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
5. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts:102
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: The type name 'IIMapIntegrationModel' appears to have an extra 'I'. Please verify if this should be 'IImapIntegrationModel' for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
6. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts:103
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: The type name 'IIMapMessageModel' seems to include an extra 'I'. Confirm if this should be named 'IImapMessageModel' instead. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
7. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Possible Typographical Error: The interface name 'IIMapCustomer' has two consecutive 'I's. If this is unintentional, consider renaming it to 'IMapCustomer' to maintain consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The change from IMapCustomer to IIMapCustomer appears to be intentional since it was consistently changed in both places. The 'II' prefix could be intentional naming convention. Without more context about the codebase's naming conventions, we can't be certain this is a mistake. Making assumptions about typos without full context could lead to unnecessary back-and-forth. The double 'I' could genuinely be a typo that should be fixed, and catching typos early prevents them from propagating through the codebase. While it could be a typo, the consistent renaming across both interfaces suggests intentionality. Without clear evidence of a mistake, we should trust the author's naming choice. Delete this comment as it makes assumptions about naming conventions without strong evidence of an actual issue.
8. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts:11
- Draft comment:
There appears to be a typographical inconsistency in the interface naming. The document interface is renamed toIIMapCustomerDocumentand it extendsIIMapCustomer, but elsewhere (e.g., in the context ofIMapCustomer) a single 'I' is used as a prefix. Please confirm if the double 'I' is intentional or if it should be reverted to a single 'I'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
9. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts:2
- Draft comment:
The interface nameIIMapIntegrationlooks suspicious. Did you intend for it to beIMapIntegrationor maybeIImapIntegration? Please double-check to ensure this extra 'I' is intentional. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is asking the author to double-check their intention, which explicitly violates our rules. It's asking "Did you intend..." and "Please double-check..." which are exactly the kind of verification questions we should avoid. While the naming might be unusual, we should trust that the author made this change intentionally. The interface name does look genuinely confusing and could cause maintenance issues. Maybe this is actually an important enough issue to flag? While the naming might be suboptimal, our rules explicitly state not to ask authors to verify their intentions. If there's a naming issue, it should be raised as a direct suggestion rather than a verification question. Delete this comment because it violates our rule about asking authors to verify their intentions or double-check things.
10. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts:15
- Draft comment:
Typographical note: The new interface name 'IIMapIntegrationDocument' (and the extended interface 'IIMapIntegration') appears to have an extra 'I' compared to the previously defined 'IMapIntegration'. Please confirm if this naming is intentional or if it's a typo. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is asking for confirmation/explanation of intention, which violates our rules. It's not suggesting a clear code change, just asking if something is intentional. The interface rename is a straightforward change that would be caught by the build if it caused any issues. The extra 'I' could indicate a genuine naming convention issue that should be fixed for consistency. While naming consistency is important, the comment violates our rules by asking for confirmation rather than making a clear suggestion. If there was a real issue, it would affect imports and usage across the codebase, which would be caught by the build. Delete the comment as it violates our rules by asking for confirmation of intention rather than suggesting a clear code change.
11. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The identifier 'IIMapCustomerDocument' (with two I's) on this line might be an unintended typo. Please verify if the intended name should be 'IMapCustomerDocument'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The change appears intentional since it's consistently applied to both the Document and Model types. The double 'I' could be a valid prefix convention (e.g., one I for Interface, one I for IMAP). Without seeing the rest of the codebase's naming conventions, we can't be sure this is actually a mistake. The double 'I' does look unusual and could genuinely be a typo. The consistent application of the change doesn't necessarily mean it's correct. However, we don't have strong evidence that this is actually wrong. The PR author deliberately made this change, and it could be part of a larger renaming effort or follow an established pattern. Delete this comment. While unusual, we don't have strong evidence that the double 'I' is actually wrong, and asking for verification violates our rules about not asking authors to confirm their intentions.
12. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts:4
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The type alias 'IIMapCustomerModel' (with two I's) appears to repeat the letter 'I'. Confirm whether the correct identifier should be 'IMapCustomerModel'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment suggests there might be a typo with the double 'I', but this appears to be an intentional rename since it's consistent across both usages. The import statement also uses IIMapCustomerDocument, suggesting this is a deliberate naming choice. Additionally, commenting on potential typos in identifiers is not very useful since the code would fail to compile if the names didn't match. The double 'I' does look unusual, and there might be a convention I'm not aware of that makes this actually incorrect. Even if there is a convention being violated, asking for confirmation about naming is not actionable and would be caught by the build if incorrect. Delete this comment. It's asking for confirmation about something that appears intentional, and naming mismatches would be caught by the build anyway.
13. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts:2
- Draft comment:
There's a minor spacing issue in the import statement on this line. Consider changing: import { IIMapIntegrationDocument} from '@/integrations/imap/@types/integrations'; To: import { IIMapIntegrationDocument } from '@/integrations/imap/@types/integrations'; for improved readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about inconsistent spacing, it's an extremely minor stylistic issue. The rules specifically state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. Spacing in import statements is exactly the kind of minor issue that should be handled by automated formatting tools, not PR comments. The spacing inconsistency could potentially indicate that automated formatting is not properly set up in the project, which might be worth addressing. Even if formatting tools aren't properly configured, that's a separate infrastructure issue that should be addressed globally, not through individual PR comments about spacing. Delete this comment. It's too minor and stylistic to be worth addressing in a PR review.
14. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:47
- Draft comment:
There's an extra space after 'selector' in the object. Please remove the extra space for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While consistency in code style is good, this is an extremely minor issue that doesn't affect functionality. Most teams use automated formatters like Prettier that would fix this automatically. Making a PR comment about a single extra space creates noise without adding value. Perhaps maintaining strict consistency in whitespace helps readability and shows attention to detail? Maybe the team has strict style guidelines about spaces? Even if the team cares about consistent spacing, this is better handled by automated tools rather than manual code review comments. The cognitive overhead of the comment outweighs the tiny benefit. Delete this comment as it's too minor of a style issue to warrant a PR comment. This kind of formatting should be handled by automated tools.
Workflow ID: wflow_o8w80EZOTWgzN4SQ
You can customize
|
|
||
| customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ | ||
| pluginName: 'core', | ||
| method: 'query', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify TRPC method for updateCustomer; using query for an update may be incorrect.
| method: 'query', | |
| method: 'mutation', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (6)
42-48:⚠️ Potential issueUse 'mutation' method for updateCustomer
The TRPC call is using 'query' method for an operation that updates data. This will hit the read endpoint instead of the write endpoint.
customer = await sendTRPCMessage({ pluginName: 'core', - method: 'query', + method: 'mutation', module: 'customers', action: 'updateCustomer', input: { selector }, });
115-125:⚠️ Potential issueTransporter configuration issues
There are multiple issues with the SMTP transporter configuration:
- Hard-coded
secure: truewill cause failures on STARTTLS ports (587/25)- Debug logging is enabled in all environments, which could expose sensitive data in production
const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: integration.smtpHost, port: integration.smtpPort, - secure: true, + secure: integration.smtpPort === 465, - logger: true, - debug: true, + logger: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production', + debug: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production', auth: { user: integration.mainUser || integration.user, pass: integration.password } });
127-140:⚠️ Potential issueEmail data structure issues
Several issues with the mailData structure:
- Missing cc, bcc, and replyTo fields
references: [replyToMessageId]will include[null]or[undefined]if replyToMessageId isn't provided- Empty attachments array is unnecessary when no attachments exist
const mailData = { from, to, + cc: args.cc, + bcc: args.bcc, + replyTo: args.replyTo, subject: replyToMessageId ? `Re: ${subject}` : subject, html: body, inReplyTo: replyToMessageId, - references: [replyToMessageId], + references: replyToMessageId ? [replyToMessageId] : undefined, attachments: attachments ? attachments.map((attach) => ({ filename: attach.name, path: attach.url })) - : [] // Default to an empty array if attachments is undefined + : undefined };
144-163:⚠️ Potential issueDatabase write not awaited - potential data loss
The
ImapMessages.create()call is asynchronous but not awaited. This could lead to the function returning before the write completes, potentially causing data loss or masking errors.- await models.ImapMessages.create({ + const savedMessage = await models.ImapMessages.create({ inboxIntegrationId: integration.inboxId, inboxConversationId: conversationId, createdAt: new Date(), messageId: info.messageId, inReplyTo: replyToMessageId, references: mailData.references, subject: mailData.subject, body: mailData.html, to: (mailData.to || []).map((to) => ({ name: to, address: to })), from: [{ name: mailData.from, address: mailData.from }], attachments: attachments ? attachments.map(({ name, type, size }) => ({ filename: name, type, size })) : [], type: 'SENT' });
164-166:⚠️ Potential issueReturn value doesn't match interface declaration
The method is declared to return
Promise<IIMapMessageDocument>but returns{ info }. This mismatch could cause type errors and unexpected behavior.- return { - info: info - }; + return savedMessage;
17-21:⚠️ Potential issueReturn type mismatch between interface and implementation
The interface declares
Promise<IIMapMessageDocument>but the implementation returns{ info }object, which creates a type inconsistency that could lead to runtime errors.Either modify the interface to match the return value or adjust the implementation to return the created document:
public static async createSendMail( - args: any, + args: ISendMailArgs, subdomain: string, models: IModels -) { +): Promise<IIMapMessageDocument> {And then update the return statement later in the method.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (2)
96-113: Incomplete implementation for conversation status updatesThe code for updating conversation status (shouldResolve/shouldOpen) is commented out, making these parameters ineffective.
Would you like me to help implement the conversation status update functionality? This would allow the shouldResolve and shouldOpen parameters to work as expected.
16-168: Consider using simple functions instead of a class with only static methodsThe
Messageclass only contains a static method, which makes it more appropriate to use a simple function.Consider refactoring to use a simple exported function:
- export const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { - class Message { - public static async createSendMail( + export const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { + const createSendMail = async ( args: any, subdomain: string, models: IModels ) => { // implementation... } - } - messageSchema.loadClass(Message); + messageSchema.statics.createSendMail = createSendMail; return messageSchema; };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-168: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts(4 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/integrations.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Customers.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Integrations.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/customers.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
[error] 16-168: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| if (!integration && conversationId) { | ||
| // const conversation = await sendInboxMessage({ | ||
| // subdomain, | ||
| // action: 'conversations.findOne', | ||
| // data: { _id: conversationId }, | ||
| // isRPC: true | ||
| // }); | ||
|
|
||
| // integration = await models.ImapIntegrations.findOne({ | ||
| // inboxId: conversation.integrationId | ||
| // }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Incomplete implementation for finding integration by conversationId
The code for finding an integration via conversationId is commented out, which could lead to unexpected behavior if this code path is ever taken.
If this functionality is needed, implement it fully. Otherwise, consider removing the commented code to avoid confusion. Could you verify if this feature is required for the current implementation?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any references to the conversationId lookup in tests or documentation
rg -A 3 "integration.*conversationId" --glob "*.{ts,js,md}"Length of output: 560
Cleanup commented-out conversationId lookup code
No other references to conversationId or an integration lookup by conversationId were found in the codebase, tests, or documentation. To avoid confusion and dead code, please remove the commented-out block (or fully implement it if this feature becomes required).
• File: backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
Lines: ~79–90
Suggested diff:
- if (!integration && conversationId) {
- // const conversation = await sendInboxMessage({
- // subdomain,
- // action: 'conversations.findOne',
- // data: { _id: conversationId },
- // isRPC: true
- // });
-
- // integration = await models.ImapIntegrations.findOne({
- // inboxId: conversation.integrationId
- // });
- }
+ // If needed in future: handle lookup by conversationId here.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!integration && conversationId) { | |
| // const conversation = await sendInboxMessage({ | |
| // subdomain, | |
| // action: 'conversations.findOne', | |
| // data: { _id: conversationId }, | |
| // isRPC: true | |
| // }); | |
| // integration = await models.ImapIntegrations.findOne({ | |
| // inboxId: conversation.integrationId | |
| // }); | |
| } | |
| // If needed in future: handle lookup by conversationId here. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
around lines 79 to 90, the commented-out code for finding an integration by
conversationId is incomplete and unused. Since no references to this
functionality exist in the codebase or tests, remove the entire commented block
to clean up dead code and avoid confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 631d89a in 1 minute and 43 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
122lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts:5
- Draft comment:
Minor style note: Add a space after the colon for consistency (e.g.contactsId: { type: String }). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%<= threshold50%None
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts:6
- Draft comment:
Consider using a Number type for smtpPort instead of String to more naturally represent a port. If string is needed, add a comment explaining the design choice. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid point about type representation. However, the current implementation with String + validation seems intentional since it handles string input and validates numeric constraints. Mongoose schemas often use String for numeric inputs to handle form data more easily. The validation ensures correct values despite the string type. The comment identifies a potential type mismatch, but may not fully appreciate the common pattern of using strings for numeric form inputs in Mongoose schemas. While using Number might seem more natural, the String type with validation is a valid and common pattern, especially when dealing with form inputs. The comment should be deleted as the current implementation is a valid pattern and the suggested change isn't clearly beneficial.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts:6
- Draft comment:
The attachmentSchema and messageSchema validations look robust. Just ensure the minimum size (min: 1) for attachments meets your business requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts:5
- Draft comment:
Typographical issue: Inconsistent spacing after the colon in the property definition for 'contactsId'. For consistency with the rest of the schema, consider adding a space after the colon (e.g.,contactsId: { type: String }). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is about a very minor spacing issue. While technically correct, it's purely cosmetic and doesn't affect functionality. Most codebases would handle this automatically with a code formatter like Prettier. The rules specifically say not to make obvious or unimportant comments. The inconsistent spacing could make the code harder to read and maintain over time. It might indicate that code formatting tools aren't properly configured. While code consistency is important, this is too minor an issue to warrant a PR comment. This should be handled by automated formatting tools, not manual review comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor and would be better handled by automated formatting tools.
Workflow ID: wflow_C5GsHPu2RB7ogeKR
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts (2)
16-16: Security concern: password still stored as plain textThe password field is still stored as plain text, which presents a significant security risk. This was mentioned in a previous review but hasn't been addressed.
Consider implementing encryption for this sensitive field, either through:
- A pre-save hook that encrypts the password
- A separate service for securely managing credentials
- password: { type: String, required: true }, + password: { + type: String, + required: true, + set: encryptPassword, // Function to encrypt password + get: decryptPassword, // Function to decrypt password + },Make sure to add the encryption/decryption utility functions to handle the password securely.
2-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd timestamps and consider additional schema improvements
The schema is missing timestamps which are useful for tracking when records are created or modified. Also consider adding indexes for fields that will be frequently queried.
export const integrationSchema = new Schema({ // existing fields... lastFetchDate: Date, +}, { + timestamps: true, // Adds createdAt and updatedAt fields + // Consider adding indexes for frequently queried fields + indexes: [ + { inboxId: 1 }, + { host: 1 } + ] });
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts (2)
4-5: Add validation for hostname fieldsSimilar to the smtpPort validation, consider adding validation for host and smtpHost fields to ensure they are valid hostnames or IP addresses.
host: { type: String, required: true, + validate: { + validator: (v: string) => /^(([a-zA-Z0-9]|[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9\-]*[a-zA-Z0-9])\.)*([A-Za-z0-9]|[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\-]*[A-Za-z0-9])$|^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/.test(v), + message: 'Invalid hostname or IP address format' + } }, smtpHost: { type: String, required: true, + validate: { + validator: (v: string) => /^(([a-zA-Z0-9]|[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9\-]*[a-zA-Z0-9])\.)*([A-Za-z0-9]|[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\-]*[A-Za-z0-9])$|^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/.test(v), + message: 'Invalid hostname or IP address format' + } },Also consider validating user/mainUser fields if they represent email addresses:
mainUser: { type: String, required: true, + validate: { + validator: (v: string) => /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(v), + message: 'Invalid email format' + } }, user: { type: String, required: true, + validate: { + validator: (v: string) => /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(v), + message: 'Invalid email format' + } },Also applies to: 14-15
17-19: Add field descriptions and improve non-required fieldsConsider adding descriptions to fields and properly defining optional fields with explicit types:
- healthStatus: String, - error: String, - lastFetchDate: Date, + healthStatus: { + type: String, + enum: ['healthy', 'warning', 'error'], + default: 'healthy', + description: 'Current health status of the IMAP integration' + }, + error: { + type: String, + description: 'Error message if integration is failing' + }, + lastFetchDate: { + type: Date, + description: 'Timestamp of last successful data fetch' + },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/integrations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/customers.ts
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 4f43fdb in 1 minute and 38 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
105lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:130
- Draft comment:
Conditional assignment for 'references' is clear – it only sets the field if replyToMessageId exists. Ensure that downstream code handles an undefined value appropriately, or consider defaulting to an empty array if that is expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts:10
- Draft comment:
The mutation validates for 'args.text' but createSendMail expects a 'body' property. Consider aligning the field names to avoid potential issues in mail content. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid concern about API consistency. However, without seeing the createSendMail implementation, we can't verify if there's actually a mismatch. The comment is speculative without this evidence. We should err on the side of assuming the author tested this and it works. I could be wrong about needing to see createSendMail - maybe the field name mismatch is obvious enough from just this code. The validation could be causing silent failures. While the concern is reasonable, we need strong evidence to keep comments. Without seeing createSendMail's implementation, this is too speculative. Delete the comment as it's speculative without evidence of the actual createSendMail implementation details.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts:23
- Draft comment:
Returning the substring directly in getNewContentFromMessageBody is concise. Ensure that the HTML always contains the expected markers, or consider adding additional checks for robustness. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts:43
- Draft comment:
The mapping changes (casting _id to a string, defaulting message.body when missing, and ensuring attachments default to an empty array) improve consistency and safety. Verify that similar fallbacks are applied throughout to handle missing or malformed data. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%None
5. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts:23
- Draft comment:
Typographical note: There appears to be an extra whitespace between 'return' and 'html.substring'. Consider removing the extra space for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about the extra space, this is an extremely minor formatting issue that doesn't affect functionality. Most teams use automatic code formatters that would handle this. The comment adds noise without providing real value. We should focus on more substantial issues. The extra space could be indicative of inconsistent code formatting practices across the codebase. Some teams do care about exact formatting. Even if formatting consistency is important, this is better handled by automated tools and linters rather than manual code review comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor and focuses on a trivial whitespace issue that doesn't impact code quality or functionality.
Workflow ID: wflow_0sqipfLrfamJjV8a
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (8)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts (1)
19-24: Inline variable that is immediately returned- const sendMail = await models.ImapMessages.createSendMail( - args, - subdomain, - models, - ); - return sendMail; + return await models.ImapMessages.createSendMail( + args, + subdomain, + models, + );backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (7)
79-90: Cleanup commented-out conversationId lookup codeThe commented-out code for finding an integration by conversationId is incomplete and appears unused. Either implement it fully if needed or remove it to avoid confusion and dead code.
- if (!integration && conversationId) { - // const conversation = await sendInboxMessage({ - // subdomain, - // action: 'conversations.findOne', - // data: { _id: conversationId }, - // isRPC: true - // }); - - // integration = await models.ImapIntegrations.findOne({ - // inboxId: conversation.integrationId - // }); - } + // If needed in future: handle lookup by conversationId here.
8-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace
anytype with a proper interface for better type safetyUsing
anyfor theargsparameter reduces type safety. Define a specific interface for the expected arguments to improve code maintainability and prevent potential runtime errors.+interface ISendMailArgs { + integrationId: string; + conversationId?: string; + subject: string; + body: string; + from: string; + customerId?: string; + to: string | string[]; + attachments?: Array<{name: string; url: string; type?: string; size?: number}>; + replyToMessageId?: string; + shouldOpen?: boolean; + shouldResolve?: boolean; + cc?: string[]; + bcc?: string[]; + replyTo?: string; +} export interface IIMapMessageModel extends Model<IIMapMessageDocument> { createSendMail( - args: any, + args: ISendMailArgs, subdomain: string, models: IModels ): Promise<IIMapMessageDocument>; }
16-21:⚠️ Potential issueAlign method signature with implementation return type
The interface declares the return type as
Promise<IIMapMessageDocument>, but the implementation returns{ info: info }. This mismatch will cause type errors and confusion for callers.Either update the interface to match the implementation:
export interface IIMapMessageModel extends Model<IIMapMessageDocument> { createSendMail( args: any, subdomain: string, models: IModels - ): Promise<IIMapMessageDocument>; + ): Promise<{ info: any }>; }Or preferably, make the implementation return the document as declared:
- return { - info: info - }; + return await models.ImapMessages.create({ // ...document creation code... + });🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-168: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
44-44:⚠️ Potential issueWrong RPC method verb – will hit the READ endpoint
The
updateCustomeraction suggests a mutation, butmethod: 'query'is passed, so the core service will treat it as a read operation.- method: 'query', + method: 'mutation',
118-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionDisable verbose logging in production
Enabling
logger: trueanddebug: truemay log sensitive email data. These should be conditional based on the environment.- secure: true, - logger: true, - debug: true, + secure: integration.smtpPort === 465, + logger: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production', + debug: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production',
127-140:⚠️ Potential issueForward cc, bcc, and replyTo fields in mailData
The
mailDataobject should include thecc,bcc, andreplyTofields from the input arguments if they're provided.const mailData = { from, to, + cc: args.cc, + bcc: args.bcc, + replyTo: args.replyTo, subject: replyToMessageId ? `Re: ${subject}` : subject, html: body, inReplyTo: replyToMessageId, references: replyToMessageId ? [replyToMessageId] : undefined, attachments: attachments ? attachments.map((attach) => ({ filename: attach.name, path: attach.url })) - : [] // Default to an empty array if attachments is undefined + : undefined // Omit attachments when none are provided };
144-167:⚠️ Potential issueAwait the ImapMessages.create call and return the document
The document creation is not awaited and the returned value doesn't match the declared return type. Fix this to ensure DB operations complete properly and errors are correctly propagated.
- await models.ImapMessages.create({ + const createdMessage = await models.ImapMessages.create({ inboxIntegrationId: integration.inboxId, inboxConversationId: conversationId, createdAt: new Date(), messageId: info.messageId, inReplyTo: replyToMessageId, references: mailData.references, subject: mailData.subject, body: mailData.html, to: (mailData.to || []).map((to) => ({ name: to, address: to })), from: [{ name: mailData.from, address: mailData.from }], attachments: attachments ? attachments.map(({ name, type, size }) => ({ filename: name, type, size })) : [], type: 'SENT' }); - return { - info: info - }; + return createdMessage;
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (1)
15-173: Convert static-only class to a function moduleThe static analysis tool flags that this class contains only static members. Consider refactoring to use a function instead of a class with static methods.
export const loadImapMessageClass = (models) => { - class Message { - public static async createSendMail( + const messageClassMethods = { + async createSendMail( args: any, subdomain: string, models: IModels ) { // ... implementation ... } - } + }; - messageSchema.loadClass(Message); + messageSchema.statics.createSendMail = messageClassMethods.createSendMail; return messageSchema; };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-168: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts (2)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/index.ts (1)
imapMutations(4-4)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (1)
IContext(106-110)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts (4)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts (1)
IIMapMessageDocument(28-28)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (1)
IModels(86-104)backend/erxes-api-shared/src/utils/trpc/index.ts (1)
sendTRPCMessage(43-65)backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/definitions/messages.ts (1)
messageSchema(26-45)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
[error] 16-168: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| if (conversationId) { | ||
| if (shouldResolve) { | ||
| // await sendInboxMessage({ | ||
| // subdomain, | ||
| // action: 'conversations.changeStatus', | ||
| // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'closed' }, | ||
| // isRPC: true | ||
| // }); | ||
| } | ||
| if (shouldOpen) { | ||
| // await sendInboxMessage({ | ||
| // subdomain, | ||
| // action: 'conversations.changeStatus', | ||
| // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'new' }, | ||
| // isRPC: true | ||
| // }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement or remove commented-out conversation status code
The code for handling shouldResolve and shouldOpen flags contains only commented-out implementation. Either implement this functionality or remove the conditional blocks entirely.
- if (conversationId) {
- if (shouldResolve) {
- // await sendInboxMessage({
- // subdomain,
- // action: 'conversations.changeStatus',
- // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'closed' },
- // isRPC: true
- // });
- }
- if (shouldOpen) {
- // await sendInboxMessage({
- // subdomain,
- // action: 'conversations.changeStatus',
- // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'new' },
- // isRPC: true
- // });
- }
- }
+ // TODO: Implement conversation status updates when API is available📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (conversationId) { | |
| if (shouldResolve) { | |
| // await sendInboxMessage({ | |
| // subdomain, | |
| // action: 'conversations.changeStatus', | |
| // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'closed' }, | |
| // isRPC: true | |
| // }); | |
| } | |
| if (shouldOpen) { | |
| // await sendInboxMessage({ | |
| // subdomain, | |
| // action: 'conversations.changeStatus', | |
| // data: { id: conversationId, status: 'new' }, | |
| // isRPC: true | |
| // }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // TODO: Implement conversation status updates when API is available |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts
between lines 96 and 113, the conditional blocks for handling shouldResolve and
shouldOpen flags contain only commented-out code. You should either fully
implement the sendInboxMessage calls with the appropriate parameters and await
them properly, or remove these conditional blocks entirely if this functionality
is not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 620be6f in 2 minutes and 26 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
73lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts:28
- Draft comment:
Attachment interface mismatch: IIMapAttachmentParams uses 'filename' but sendMail uses 'name' and 'url'. Align the interface and usage. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment claims there's a mismatch between interfaces, but I don't see any evidence of this in the code shown. Both IIMapMessage and ISendMailArgs use the same IIMapAttachmentParams interface. The comment refers to 'sendMail' usage which isn't visible in this file. Without seeing the actual usage in sendMail, I can't verify if there's really a mismatch. I might be missing implementation details in other files where sendMail is actually used. The comment author may have seen something I haven't. Even if there is a mismatch in another file, that would be a cross-file issue. According to the rules, we should only consider the current file, where the interfaces are consistent. Delete the comment because within this file the interfaces are consistent, and any potential issues in other files are outside our scope.
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:19
- Draft comment:
Update createSendMail implementation to use ISendMailArgs instead of 'any' for type safety. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:44
- Draft comment:
TRPC customer query now uses 'findOne' instead of 'updateCustomer'. Confirm this change preserves the intended lookup/update behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:137
- Draft comment:
Attachment mapping inconsistency: Mapping uses attach.name and attach.url, but IIMapAttachmentParams provides 'filename' (and no 'url'). Adjust the mapping or update the interface. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:156
- Draft comment:
DB record attachment mapping uses 'name' and 'type' but the interface defines 'filename' and 'mimeType'. Ensure consistent field naming. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
6. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:129
- Draft comment:
Consider adding support for 'cc', 'bcc', and 'replyTo' fields in mailData if provided in args. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
7. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts:10
- Draft comment:
Validation mismatch: Check for 'body' instead of 'text' to match ISendMailArgs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_tyaTGnW7GK87jBtA
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed c0ab5ca in 53 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
23lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:144
- Draft comment:
Storing the result of the create call in 'messageDoc' is clear, but ensure that any consumers of createSendMail expect and handle this new property properly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:168
- Draft comment:
Returning both 'info' and 'messageDoc' provides more context for the operation. Confirm that downstream code handles the new 'messageDoc' field. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_969xFA3Xyr5LWBo2
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 0005f8e in 1 minute and 44 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
64lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts:28
- Draft comment:
The new ImapSendMailInput uses 'text' for message content instead of 'body'. Ensure consistency with the downstream usage. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:24
- Draft comment:
createSendMail destructures 'body' from args but the new input provides 'text'. This mismatch will result in an undefined email body. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:40
- Draft comment:
The 'to' field in the new input can be a string or an array, but the code assumes an array (e.g., using [primaryEmail] and mapping over it). Convert 'to' to an array when it's a string. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/db/models/Messages.ts:129
- Draft comment:
The new ImapSendMailInput adds cc, bcc, and replyTo fields, but these aren't used in the mailData. Consider including them in the nodemailer options if needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts:27
- Draft comment:
Exposing raw error messages (error.message) in the thrown error may leak internal details. Consider logging the error internally and returning a generic error message. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_t7NRKlKbVNEveynO
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed e4c77cf in 1 minute and 13 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
25lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts:31
- Draft comment:
Ensure that adding a required 'body' field aligns with upstream validations. Verify that any client or resolver expecting a 'text' field is updated. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the change aligns with upstream validations and to verify updates to clients or resolvers. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure or verify things.
2. backend/plugins/frontline_api/src/modules/integrations/imap/@types/messages.ts:31
- Draft comment:
There is a minor typographical issue in the new property declaration: it should bebody: string;(with a space after the colon) to maintain consistency with the rest of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about the inconsistency, style issues like this are typically handled by linters and formatters. The issue is very minor and doesn't affect functionality. Most teams have automated tools to fix such formatting. The inconsistency could make the code slightly harder to read, and if there's no automated formatting in place, it could lead to inconsistent style patterns spreading. However, this is exactly the kind of minor formatting issue that should be caught and fixed by automated tools, not manual review comments. It adds noise to the review process. Delete this comment. This kind of minor formatting issue should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments.
Workflow ID: wflow_k4oP3LPSpdK9Hrd4
You can customize
| try { | ||
| // Basic validation | ||
| if (!args.to || !args.subject || !args.body) { | ||
| throw new Error('Missing required fields: to, subject or text'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Error message still references 'text'; update it to reflect 'body' for consistency.
| throw new Error('Missing required fields: to, subject or text'); | |
| throw new Error('Missing required fields: to, subject or body'); |
Summary by Sourcery
Add a new IMAP integration module to support sending and retrieving email messages.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Build:
Important
Add IMAP integration module for email operations with new models, GraphQL queries, and mutations.
IIMapCustomer,IIMapIntegration, andIIMapMessagemodels inconnectionResolvers.ts.imapConversationDetailandimapGetIntegrationsinqueries.ts.imapSendMailinmutations.ts.createSendMailinMessages.tsusing nodemailer and TRPC.nodemaileras a dependency inpackage.json.This description was created by
for e4c77cf. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores