-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
add api for conditional append forward in xfcc header #41683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ramaraochavali
wants to merge
1
commit into
envoyproxy:main
Choose a base branch
from
ramaraochavali:fix/xfcc_optional
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+15
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The requirement is reasonable, But I think this API is too specific for the feature requirement. I think maybe we can add a generic matcher tree here. And make the following result as the match result. Then, we can get a very flexible and powerful way to customize the client cert forward behavior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What other generic matching use cases do you anticipate? BTW, filter chain match does not work for us. The same api call can come from both types of clients
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the generic matching, 1. we can use more flexible matching conditions, 2. we can select any behavior based on the matching results and no only the
SANITIZE_SET_OR_APPEND_FORWARD, 3. we can also customize theSetCurrentClientCertDetailsbased on the matching results.But anyway, I still prefer to use the filter chain matching. We can enhance the filter chain matching to support san matcher. (To enhance
envoy.config.listener.v3.FilterChainMatchor filter chain matcher treeenvoy.config.listener.v3.filter_chain_matcher.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you are saying about filter chain matcher. Let me think about how it works with Istio Ingress Gateway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/wait-any