-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[new product] Sourcegraph #4914
Conversation
add product sourcegraph.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the PR. left a few suggestions, happy to discuss further. The main one is the lack of an upstream release policy link.
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nemo <[email protected]>
Update products/sourcegraph.md
Update products/sourcegraph.md
Thank you for the suggested changes. I have now included a policy release document link that I believe will be sufficent and contains important information regarding releases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All changes made
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Alexm0812, it's almost good to me, but I have a few more comments / suggestions.
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marc Wrobel <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @marcwrobel thank you for the suggestions. I have committed these now and everything should be good.
Should we mark v4 as supported given this? It is unclear what their definition of "support" is, if there are no backports at all, and security backports are also not mentioned. Is it just that they will reply to support tickets? |
Relevant PR: sourcegraph/handbook#6828. I've filed sourcegraph/handbook#8847 |
I had considered this however I saw it as they don’t provide “full support” I thought it be best to say that no support is given. Although they provide some support I don’t think it’s enough to consider it as say they provide support especially as no backports are done and it seems no security backports either. |
I can confirm no security or bug fixes are done for older versions. “For older versions of Sourcegraph, the primary support offered involves assistance with upgrading to a supported version. While Sourcegraph does not backport bug fixes or improvements to older versions, the team encourages users to update to the latest versions to benefit from new features and fixes. This approach ensures users have the most secure and efficient version of the software, but specific help for outdated versions, beyond upgrade guidance, may be limited.” |
Since we are marking v4 as unsupported deliberately, against what the upstream says - we need to be clear why there is a disparity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. We can update further if we get clarity from upstream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Thank you and congratulations for your first contribution! endoflife.date is a community wiki, and we're always looking for more contributions 🥇 💯 🎉. |
@Alexm0812 Thanks for your contribution 🥇 |
No description provided.