Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[9.0] TBS: make storage_limit follow processor lifecycle; update TBS processor config (backport #15488) #15491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Motivation/summary

Fix a regression from #15235 where storage_limit does not follow processor lifecycle.
Remove storage limit from processor config.
Add storage to processor config validation.

Checklist

- [ ] Update CHANGELOG.asciidoc Fixing a regression from an unreleased change

  • Documentation has been updated

For functional changes, consider:

  • Is it observable through the addition of either logging or metrics?
  • Is its use being published in telemetry to enable product improvement?
  • Have system tests been added to avoid regression?

How to test these changes

Should be tested along #15235 . Ensure that EA hot reload applies the new storage limit by changing the integration policy.

Related issues


This is an automatic backport of pull request #15488 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

…sor config (#15488)

Fix a regression from #15235 where storage_limit does not follow processor lifecycle.
Remove storage limit from processor config.
Add storage to processor config validation.

(cherry picked from commit dcb08ac)
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jan 30, 2025
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2025 20:00
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 8077005 into 9.0 Jan 30, 2025
15 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/9.0/pr-15488 branch January 30, 2025 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant