Make nix integration more seamless#9
Draft
AleksanderGondek wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Contributor
|
I quite like this approach, potential to abstract a lot of the duplication. Looking forward to the progress - might even offer some help in the coming days. |
finn-qarik
force-pushed
the
master
branch
4 times, most recently
from
b7588d4 to
aec36d2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change aims to decouple nix setup / package preparation from actual usage in Bazel WORKSPACE - the nix definitions have been move to entirely different place, where nixReadTree is used (to improve code-reuse and align with nixpkgs conventions).
Work still remaining: