Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cache SPI and resource serialization #92

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

wzy1935
Copy link
Contributor

@wzy1935 wzy1935 commented Jul 15, 2024

Closes #67

Updated the cache SPI and added serialization for the Resource class.

Copy link
Contributor

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @wzy1935 ! I did a first round of comments

@wzy1935 wzy1935 mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @wzy1935 , I've added another batch of comments

Can you also add a test that verifies the behavior of a shared cached? That is, if it has stored a response for a one reverse proxy instance, another proxy instance will not have to contact the backend.

Copy link
Contributor

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @wzy1935 ! Some more comments

@tsegismont
Copy link
Contributor

Can you please rebase this PR? Thank you

Copy link
Contributor

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @wzy1935 , another batch of reviews

@tsegismont tsegismont merged commit 55fdd36 into eclipse-vertx:main Jan 27, 2025
5 checks passed
@tsegismont
Copy link
Contributor

I went ahead and merged the PR (with a small renaming of a getter in Cache options)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Introduce a cache storage SPI
4 participants