Upgrading Netty, Jetty and Spring 6 #6006
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
….0.27 and Spring from 6.0.23 to 6.2.11 to remediate CVE-2024-38820, CVE-2025-5115, CVE-2025-22233, CVE-2025-41234, CVE-2025-41249, CVE-2025-55163, CVE-2025-58056 and CVE-2025-58057 Signed-off-by: Shubham Kalloli <[email protected]>
|
Closing in favour of #6009 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
To remove the CVEs as outlined below:
Netty
CVE-2025-55163
CVE-2025-58056
CVE-2025-58057
Jetty
CVE-2025-5115
Spring6
CVE-2024-38820
CVE-2025-22233
CVE-2025-41234
CVE-2025-41249
What
Upgrade the dependency versions
Netty - 4.1.122.Final -> 4.1.125.Final
Jetty - 12.0.22 -> 12.0.27
Spring6 - 6.0.23 -> 6.2.11
Evidence
trivy_output.json
Additional Resources
I was fixing the Jettison CVEs and there is a test case which is failing. I have raised a question about the same. This would be raised as a separate PR post the discussion.
#6005