Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests for ControlDesigner.ControlDesignerAccessibleObject #12664

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MelonWang1
Copy link
Contributor

@MelonWang1 MelonWang1 commented Dec 20, 2024

Related #10773

Proposed changes

  • Add unit test ControlDesigner.ControlDesignerAccessibleObjectTests.cs for public properties and method of the ControlDesigner.ControlDesignerAccessibleObject.

  • Enable nullability in ControlDesigner.ControlDesignerAccessibleObjectTests.cs.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.04056%. Comparing base (8d96e56) to head (6c4232d).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main      #12664         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   76.02394%   76.04056%   +0.01662%     
===================================================
  Files           3180        3182          +2     
  Lines         639659      639752         +93     
  Branches       47216       47217          +1     
===================================================
+ Hits          486294      486471        +177     
+ Misses        149851      149763         -88     
- Partials        3514        3518          +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 76.04056% <100.00000%> (+0.01662%) ⬆️
integration 18.16359% <ø> (+0.00774%) ⬆️
production 49.83393% <ø> (+0.02390%) ⬆️
test 97.03040% <100.00000%> (+0.00527%) ⬆️
unit 47.05661% <ø> (+0.01722%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Dec 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ricardobossan ricardobossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants