-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Arcade 8.0, use .NET 8.0, remove old features #2355
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
bcb2946
to
dc8ce53
Compare
<PackageReference Include="Moq" Version="4.16.1" /> | ||
<PackageReference Include="xunit" Version="2.6.3" /> | ||
<PackageReference Include="xunit.runner.visualstudio" Version="2.5.5"> | ||
<PackageReference Include="Moq" Version="4.20.70" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we updating these dependencies? We should be particularly careful with this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are development dependencies only, so I see no reason why we shouldn't keep up to date. The issue with Moq has been resolved.
@@ -405,11 +405,11 @@ private static GpioDriver GetBestDriverForBoardOnWindows() | |||
|
|||
if (baseBoardProduct == HummingBoardProduct || baseBoardProduct.StartsWith($"{HummingBoardProduct} ")) | |||
{ | |||
return new HummingBoardDriver(); | |||
throw new PlatformNotSupportedException(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consider removing entire if statement
Fix compiler errors and new warnings
There's no need to create another VM inside a VM for the build, also the existing centos images don't seem to support .NET 8.0. Suppress warnings that we no longer support .NET 6.0
That will be a lot of work
No guarantee anything will execute properly yet.
Something is "only" not implemented now
…Of to fail on char. Reason was that "ref T" fields where declared as of Object type, while they should be AddressOfVariable instead.
Don't suppress the last bits, or short and byte will not behave as expected
Now "only" causing a StackOverflow in the compiler
Not sure what happened now, but quite a set of extra tests where required to get back to the previous state.
Let's see what else is still/again broken
Didn't really help the performance just yet
Causing the AwaitTask test to run forever. Not fixed yet, but throws now.
Not sure when all those methods that now only have dummy implementations are actually required. And a test on real hardware is still open.
Async methods don't work reliably yet.
For some reason, that seems to make a difference
a46f801
to
9c78a6e
Compare
... when T is an array type.
Fixes #2353 and #2354
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow