Improvements for CA config options

[gewarren]

Fixes #43864
Fixes #41018

• Add missing dataflow analysis options for code analysis
• Add code examples to dispose ownership transfer options
• Move include files for config options to config-options subfolder

---

Internal previews

Toggle expand/collapse

📄 File	🔗 Preview link
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/code-quality-rule-options.md	Code quality rule configuration options
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1054.md	CA1054: URI parameters should not be strings
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1055.md	"CA1055: URI return values should not be strings (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1056.md	CA1056: URI properties should not be strings
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1062.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1062
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1068.md	CA1068: CancellationToken parameters must come last
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1303.md	CA1303: Do not pass literals as localized parameters
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1304.md	"CA1304: Specify CultureInfo (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1305.md	CA1305: Specify IFormatProvider
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1508.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1508
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1710.md	CA1710: Identifiers should have correct suffix
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1711.md	"CA1711: Identifiers should not have incorrect suffix (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1715.md	CA1715: Identifiers should have correct prefix
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2000.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2000
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2100.md	CA2100: Review SQL queries for security vulnerabilities
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2213.md	"CA2213: Disposable fields should be disposed (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2301.md	CA2301: Do not call BinaryFormatter.Deserialize without first setting BinaryFormatter.Binder
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2302.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2302
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2311.md	CA2311: Do not deserialize without first setting NetDataContractSerializer.Binder
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2312.md	"CA2312: Ensure NetDataContractSerializer.Binder is set before deserializing (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2321.md	CA2321: Do not deserialize with JavaScriptSerializer using a SimpleTypeResolver
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2322.md	CA2322: Ensure JavaScriptSerializer is not initialized with SimpleTypeResolver before deserializing
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2327.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2327
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2328.md	CA2328: Ensure that JsonSerializerSettings are secure
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2329.md	"CA2329: Do not deserialize with JsonSerializer using an insecure configuration (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2330.md	CA2330: Ensure that JsonSerializer has a secure configuration when deserializing
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca3001.md	docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca3001
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca3002.md	CA3002: Review code for XSS vulnerabilities
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca3003.md	"CA3003: Review code for file path injection vulnerabilities (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca3004.md	CA3004: Review code for information disclosure vulnerabilities

Note

This table shows preview links for the 30 files with the most changes. For preview links for other files in this PR, select OpenPublishing.Build Details within checks.

[BillWagner]

This LGTM @gewarren

Let's

[gewarren]

Thanks for the review @BillWagner.