Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Nov 9, 2025

Addressed clarification request on review comment regarding io.EOF handling in #185.

Changes

  • No code changes required - existing implementation is correct
  • Clarified that the if/else structure properly handles the case where Read() returns both data and io.EOF
  • The variable n is correctly scoped for both branches and buf[:n] is returned when error is nil or io.EOF

The current code:

if n, err := resp.Body.Read(buf); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, io.EOF) {
    s.Buffers.Put(buf)
    return resp.StatusCode, nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to send request to %s: %d, %w", urlString, resp.StatusCode, err)
} else {
    return resp.StatusCode, buf[:n], func() {
        s.Buffers.Put(buf)
    }, nil
}

When Read() returns data with io.EOF, the condition evaluates false and the else block executes, correctly returning the data via buf[:n].


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2025
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Address feedback on request buffer reuse clarification Clarify review comment on io.EOF handling in buffer reuse Nov 9, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from dimkr November 9, 2025 07:16
@dimkr dimkr closed this Nov 9, 2025
@dimkr dimkr deleted the copilot/sub-pr-185 branch November 9, 2025 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants