fix(#64): make description optional while creating note #78
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates several parts of the repository. The pre-commit hook now omits the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant N as Note Component
participant API as API (window.api)
participant T as Toast Notification
U->>N: Click "Create Note" button
N->>API: Call createNote with default values
alt Success
API-->>N: Return new note data
N->>T: Show success notification
N->>N: Cancel ongoing note queries and update cache
N->>U: Navigate to new note
else Error
API-->>N: Return error
N->>T: Show error notification
end
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/renderer/src/components/modals/create-note-modal.tsx (1)
103-116:⚠️ Potential issueImplement optional description field.
The PR objective is to make description optional, but the current implementation doesn't reflect this change. The description field is still treated as required.
Apply this diff to make the description field optional:
<FormField control={form.control} name="description" + rules={{ required: false }} render={({ field }) => ( <FormItem> <FormLabel>Description</FormLabel> <FormControl> <Textarea {...field} /> </FormControl> - <FormDescription>Description for the note.</FormDescription> + <FormDescription>Optional description for the note.</FormDescription> <FormMessage /> </FormItem> )} />
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/renderer/src/components/shared/create-note-button.tsx (1)
7-10: Consider adding migration guidance in deprecation notice.While the deprecation notice points to
CreateNoteModal, it would be helpful to include guidance on migrating to the new note creation approach being implemented./** * - * @deprecated for more see `CreateNoteModal` component + * @deprecated This component uses the modal approach which is being phased out. + * For immediate note creation, use the new button in the Notes list header instead. + * See `src/renderer/src/components/home/index.tsx` for the new implementation. */src/renderer/src/components/home/components/note-list.tsx (2)
16-16: Consider using Tailwind's built-in overflow utilities.The
!overflow-y-autooverride might conflict with ScrollArea's internal styling. Consider using Tailwind's built-in utilities or customizing the ScrollArea component instead.- <ScrollArea className="h-screen !overflow-y-auto"> + <ScrollArea className="h-screen overflow-y-auto">
55-56: Track TODO with an issue.The TODO comment about animation should be tracked in the issue tracker for better visibility and follow-up.
Would you like me to create an issue to track this animation enhancement? I can help draft the issue with implementation details for the stretchy effect.
src/renderer/src/components/home/index.tsx (1)
30-53: Consider adding loading state handling.The mutation implementation looks good but could benefit from handling the loading state to provide better user feedback.
const { mutate } = useMutation({ mutationKey: [mutationKeys['create-note']], mutationFn: (values: FormValues & { content: object | unknown[] }) => window.api.createNote(values), + onMutate() { + toast({ title: 'Creating new note...' }) + }, async onSettled(data) {src/renderer/src/components/modals/create-note-modal.tsx (1)
35-42: Clarify deprecation notice regarding optional description.The deprecation notice is well-documented. However, since the PR objective is to make description optional, consider updating the notice to explicitly mention this change in the default configs.
/** * TODO - remove this component once the create note method is improved in production * @deprecated Create note modal is now deprecated for better UI we are going to do something like * - user click on create new note * - then a new Note will Immediately created with default configs like * - title --- untitled note - * - description --- (empty) + * - description --- optional (empty by default) */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.husky/pre-commit(0 hunks)lint-staged.config.js(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/home/components/note-list.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/home/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/modals/create-note-modal.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/shared/create-note-button.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/store/copy-widget-store.ts(0 hunks)src/renderer/src/store/modal-store.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/renderer/src/store/copy-widget-store.ts
- .husky/pre-commit
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/renderer/src/store/modal-store.ts (1)
4-4:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify removal of 'update-note-modal' key.
The removal of 'update-note-modal' suggests a shift in the note management workflow. Let's ensure this change doesn't break any existing functionality.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the removed modal key rg -l "update-note-modal"Length of output: 25
Ensure no unintended dependencies on the removed modal key
The change removing
'update-note-modal'from themodalKeysarray aligns with the intent to simplify the note workflow. A search for this key did not yield any references, but please verify manually that no tests or other modules rely on the removed key.
- Confirm that no test files or dynamic imports reference
'update-note-modal'.- Double-check any usage in components or utility functions that might construct modal keys dynamically.
src/renderer/src/components/home/index.tsx (2)
22-26: LGTM! Clear interface definition and sensible defaults.The FormValues interface and defaultNoteValues align well with making the description optional.
64-80: LGTM! Clean implementation of the new note creation UI.The new button implementation with tooltip and ghost variant provides a clean and intuitive way to create notes.
lint-staged.config.js (1)
3-3:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
LGTM! The TypeScript configuration is now more explicit.
The changes improve the type-checking process by:
- Explicitly specifying the TypeScript configuration file
- Disabling composite builds for faster checks
Let's verify the impact of disabling composite builds:
🌐 Web query:
What are the implications of setting --composite false in TypeScript?💡 Result:
Setting
--composite false(or omitting it since it defaults to false) in TypeScript impacts project configuration and build tooling in several key ways:Core Implications
Project References Disabled
Composite mode (true) is required for TypeScript project references[1][2]. Without it:
- Build tools can't track cross-project dependencies
- Incremental builds (
tsc --build) won't work optimally[7][8]Declaration File Handling
Whencomposite: false:
- Declaration files (
.d.ts) aren't automatically generated unless explicitly enabled viadeclaration: true[1][8]- Declaration maps (
declarationMap) lose their primary use case[4]Build Constraints Relaxed
Composite mode enforces stricter configuration checks that get bypassed when disabled:{ // Without composite: true: // - rootDir isn't auto-set to tsconfig directory // - Files can exist outside include/files patterns // - No strict checks on file inclusion validity[1][2] }Key Tradeoffs
Feature Composite: True Composite: False Project References ✅ Fully Supported ❌ Broken[6][7] Incremental Builds ✅ Optimized ❌ Less efficient Declaration Files ✅ Auto-generated ❌ Manual config needed Monorepo Support ✅ Recommended ⚠️ Problematic[3][7]When to Disable Composite Mode
- Non-library codebases where declaration files aren't needed[4]
- Experimental projects where strict file inclusion rules are burdensome
- Mixed build systems using non-TypeScript transpilers like Babel/SWC[3][9]
However, most modern TypeScript monorepos and libraries should keep
composite: truefor proper build optimization and cross-project type safety[7][10]. Disabling it typically requires compensating with additional build tool configuration[3][9].Citations:
- 1: https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/composite.html
- 2: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-New-Handbook/blob/master/reference/Compiler%20Options.md
- 3: microsoft/TypeScript#59727
- 4: https://www.totaltypescript.com/books/total-typescript-essentials/configuring-typescript
- 5: https://blog.logrocket.com/exploring-advanced-compiler-options-typescript/
- 6: nrwl/nx#27292
- 7: https://dev.to/mxro/the-ultimate-guide-to-typescript-monorepos-5ap7
- 8: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html
- 9: https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/
- 10: https://typescript-v2-527-ortam.vercel.app/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html
Approval with Caution on Composite Mode Disabling
The updated configuration is clear and simplifies the type-checking process by:
- Explicitly specifying the
tsconfig.jsonfile.- Disabling composite builds with
--composite false.Since composite mode is essential for project references and incremental builds, please ensure that:
- Your build process and any reliance on TypeScript project references or optimized incremental builds are not adversely affected.
- This change aligns with your project’s requirements (especially if you’re not using monorepo features or automated declaration file generation).
Overall, the changes improve clarity and the intended pre-commit checks. Just verify that the impact on project build tooling remains acceptable.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores