Create label.yml

[developerEhsan]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced an automated process that assigns labels to pull requests based on modified areas, streamlining collaboration and review cycles. This improvement reduces manual effort and improves workflow efficiency, ensuring contributions are consistently organized for a smoother development process. Notably, it enhances overall productivity without altering your usual interface.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file, label.yml, designed to automatically label pull requests based on the modified paths. The workflow triggers on the pull_request_target event and runs a job named "label" using the latest Ubuntu environment. It sets specific permissions to read repository contents and write to pull requests, and utilizes the actions/labeler@v4 action with a GitHub repository token.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/label.yml	Added a new workflow to automatically label pull requests using the actions/labeler@v4 action and GitHub token.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant AL as Labeler Action

    PR->>GH: Trigger pull_request_target event
    GH->>GH: Initiate Labeler job on Ubuntu
    GH->>AL: Execute actions/labeler with GITHUB_TOKEN
    AL-->>GH: Process modified paths and assign labels
    GH-->>PR: Update pull request with labels

Loading

Poem

In a burrow of code so deep,
I hopped upon a workflow leap.
Labels sprout like springtime cheer,
Pull requests now sparkle clear!
A coder rabbit sings, "Hooray, my dear!"
🐇✨
Happy hops in every commit!

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/label.yml (1)

19-22: Consider Updating the Labeler Action Version
The static analysis tool flagged that the runner of actions/labeler@v4 might be outdated. It is advisable to check if a newer version (for example, actions/[email protected] or later, if available) exists. Updating could provide better performance and improved compatibility while ensuring you benefit from recent bug fixes and enhancements.

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/labeler@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2c0152 and 245ea47.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/label.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

.github/workflows/label.yml

20-20: the runner of "actions/labeler@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

.github/workflows/label.yml (3)

1-7: Documentation is Clear and Informative
The inline comments provide clear guidance on the purpose of the workflow and the required accompanying configuration file (i.e., .github/labeler.yml). This helps maintainers understand how to set up this automation.

---

8-9: Workflow Definition Looks Good
The workflow name and trigger event (pull_request_target) are defined appropriately for its intended purpose.

---

11-18: Job Configuration and Permissions are Set Correctly
The jobs section properly configures the job to run on the latest Ubuntu environment, and the necessary permissions (contents: read and pull-requests: write) are correctly specified to allow the action to label pull requests.