docs: Bump maven-fluido-skin to latest non-milestone version #8056
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Chad Wilson <[email protected]>
nhumblot
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes: https://github.com/apache/maven-fluido-skin/releases
I generated the site from main and compared with a generation with the new version. Both generation were made with the mvn -s settings.xml site site:stage command. I did not see differences while navigating over a few pages. It looks ok on my side. Thank you for the change!
|
Nice, I didn’t go as far as comparing like that. Just eyeballed locally when reviewing some other changes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Change
Bumps the skin version; dependabot doesn't seem to be able to handle this one.
Related issues
N/A
Have test cases been added to cover the new functionality?
no, validated locally that everything looks fine.