- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 17
 
Add SC approval and report step to DIF recommended #68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Bumblefudge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Eric Scouten <[email protected]>
Per discussion in WG meeting 10 September 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense! one other chair approval and good to merge IMHO (if WG has consensus on the underlying process)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Additions from Steering Committee feedback
| 
           Notes from SC sub-committee on DIF Recommended: 
  | 
    
Co-authored-by: Kim Hamilton Duffy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
| 
           Merging this, since several of the Steering Committee's points are being addressed in this PR, and there seem to be no objections/concerns.  | 
    
This adds two steps to the DIF recommended process: