Integrated microk8s as a target cluster #128
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
@ctrox Hi, I have seen, that my changes, as well as the ones from integrating k0s have some overlapping changes (seems like we have both been using the same coding agent ;-). I'd be happy, to do a merge on my fork, after you have merged k0s, to align my changes with the ones of k0s. Meanwhile, I'm working on a dev setup, to come up with a documentation of how to engange the current local clone with a remote test cluster (microk8s, k3s, k0s). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The integration of microk8s required some additional flags on the installer.
Also I tryed to improve the documention (getting_started and development) with some advice on how to locally run from clone and validate the hibernation of the example nginx pod.