-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Refactor keychain api #56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java (1)
1-87
: Impact on client code migration.According to the PR summary, this change streamlines the API by removing deprecated methods. This could impact existing client code that still uses the deprecated methods. Consider providing migration guidance for clients.
If this is a public API used by third-party developers, consider:
- Documenting the migration path from deprecated methods to current ones
- Adding clear deprecation warnings in the previous release
- Updating any sample code or documentation that referenced the removed methods
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java
(3 hunks)src/test/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProviderTest.java
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/test/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProviderTest.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java (6)
4-4
: Adding NamedServiceProvider import for interface extension.This import is necessary to support the new parent interface relationship established in line 15.
58-71
: Retained changePassphrase method with displayName parameter.While the deprecated simple version of
changePassphrase
has been removed per the PR summary, this more complete version that includes the displayName parameter has been retained.
73-85
: Key authentication methods preserved.The utility methods
isSupported()
andisLocked()
have been appropriately preserved to maintain core keychain access functionality.
17-25
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify that any implementations properly handle the static factory method.
The static factory method
get()
remains unchanged but will now return providers that implement the additionalNamedServiceProvider
interface. Ensure all implementations are updated accordingly.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find all implementations of KeychainAccessProvider rg -t java "class\s+\w+\s+implements.*KeychainAccessProvider" --trim # Check if they also implement NamedServiceProvider or need updates rg -t java "class\s+\w+\s+implements.*KeychainAccessProvider" -B 10 -A 5Length of output: 145
Action Required: Verify Implementations Update for KeychainAccessProvider
The automated search did not return any matches for classes implementing
KeychainAccessProvider
—this result is inconclusive. Please manually verify that all implementations (if any exist) also implement the newNamedServiceProvider
interface as required for the static factory methodget()
. In particular, confirm the following:
- Any class providing a concrete implementation of
KeychainAccessProvider
is updated to includeNamedServiceProvider
in its interface list.- The behavior of the static factory method (which filters for supported providers) remains correct with the updated contract.
15-15
:✅ Verification successful
Interface now extends NamedServiceProvider.
By extending the
NamedServiceProvider
interface, implementations ofKeychainAccessProvider
will need to implement any methods defined in the parent interface. This change aligns with the PR objective to make this a named service provider.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check what methods are required by NamedServiceProvider interface rg -t java "interface NamedServiceProvider" -A 10Length of output: 1483
KeychainAccessProvider Now Inherits NamedServiceProvider (with Default
getName()
Implementation)
- The change correctly updates KeychainAccessProvider to extend NamedServiceProvider.
- Note that the NamedServiceProvider interface provides a default implementation for the
getName()
method. This means that implementations of KeychainAccessProvider are not forced to overridegetName()
unless they need customized behavior.- This update aligns with the PR's objective of making KeychainAccessProvider a named service provider while leveraging default method implementations.
39-40
:✅ Verification successful
Simplified storePassphrase method signature.
The method signature has been simplified by removing the
requireOsAuthentication
parameter. This is in line with the PR objectives to streamline the API.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing implementations that might be affected by this change rg -t java "storePassphrase\s*\(\s*String\s+\w+\s*,\s*.*?boolean" --trimLength of output: 74
Could you please run the above script to confirm that no lingering references to the removed parameter exist?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated storePassphrase method in KeychainAccessProvider.java no longer includes the "requireOsAuthentication" parameter. rg "storePassphrase\s*\([^)]*requireOsAuthentication" src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.javaLength of output: 135
Simplified storePassphrase signature verified
The updated method signature in
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java
now correctly omits therequireOsAuthentication
parameter, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives to streamline the API. No lingering references to the removed parameter were found.
Adhere to new version of integration-api See: cryptomator/integrations-api#56
Adhere to new version of integration-api See: cryptomator/integrations-api#56
This PR refactors the KeychainAccessServiceProvider.