Skip to content

Refactor keychain api #56

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

infeo
Copy link
Member

@infeo infeo commented Mar 3, 2025

This PR refactors the KeychainAccessServiceProvider.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the KeychainAccessProvider interface by extending it with the NamedServiceProvider interface. In doing so, it removes several deprecated methods and parameters. Notably, the displayName() method is eliminated, the simple storePassphrase(String key, CharSequence passphrase) method is removed, and the storePassphrase method is simplified by dropping the requireOsAuthentication parameter from its signature. Additionally, the deprecated changePassphrase(String key, CharSequence passphrase) method has been removed. The deletion of the KeychainAccessProviderTest.java file indicates that corresponding unit tests for these methods have been removed, reflecting the streamlined functionality of the interface.

Possibly related PRs

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java (1)

1-87: Impact on client code migration.

According to the PR summary, this change streamlines the API by removing deprecated methods. This could impact existing client code that still uses the deprecated methods. Consider providing migration guidance for clients.

If this is a public API used by third-party developers, consider:

  1. Documenting the migration path from deprecated methods to current ones
  2. Adding clear deprecation warnings in the previous release
  3. Updating any sample code or documentation that referenced the removed methods
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b764f2 and b0de334.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java (3 hunks)
  • src/test/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProviderTest.java (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/test/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProviderTest.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java (6)

4-4: Adding NamedServiceProvider import for interface extension.

This import is necessary to support the new parent interface relationship established in line 15.


58-71: Retained changePassphrase method with displayName parameter.

While the deprecated simple version of changePassphrase has been removed per the PR summary, this more complete version that includes the displayName parameter has been retained.


73-85: Key authentication methods preserved.

The utility methods isSupported() and isLocked() have been appropriately preserved to maintain core keychain access functionality.


17-25:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify that any implementations properly handle the static factory method.

The static factory method get() remains unchanged but will now return providers that implement the additional NamedServiceProvider interface. Ensure all implementations are updated accordingly.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all implementations of KeychainAccessProvider
rg -t java "class\s+\w+\s+implements.*KeychainAccessProvider" --trim

# Check if they also implement NamedServiceProvider or need updates
rg -t java "class\s+\w+\s+implements.*KeychainAccessProvider" -B 10 -A 5

Length of output: 145


Action Required: Verify Implementations Update for KeychainAccessProvider

The automated search did not return any matches for classes implementing KeychainAccessProvider—this result is inconclusive. Please manually verify that all implementations (if any exist) also implement the new NamedServiceProvider interface as required for the static factory method get(). In particular, confirm the following:

  • Any class providing a concrete implementation of KeychainAccessProvider is updated to include NamedServiceProvider in its interface list.
  • The behavior of the static factory method (which filters for supported providers) remains correct with the updated contract.

15-15:

✅ Verification successful

Interface now extends NamedServiceProvider.

By extending the NamedServiceProvider interface, implementations of KeychainAccessProvider will need to implement any methods defined in the parent interface. This change aligns with the PR objective to make this a named service provider.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check what methods are required by NamedServiceProvider interface
rg -t java "interface NamedServiceProvider" -A 10

Length of output: 1483


KeychainAccessProvider Now Inherits NamedServiceProvider (with Default getName() Implementation)

  • The change correctly updates KeychainAccessProvider to extend NamedServiceProvider.
  • Note that the NamedServiceProvider interface provides a default implementation for the getName() method. This means that implementations of KeychainAccessProvider are not forced to override getName() unless they need customized behavior.
  • This update aligns with the PR's objective of making KeychainAccessProvider a named service provider while leveraging default method implementations.

39-40:

✅ Verification successful

Simplified storePassphrase method signature.

The method signature has been simplified by removing the requireOsAuthentication parameter. This is in line with the PR objectives to streamline the API.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing implementations that might be affected by this change
rg -t java "storePassphrase\s*\(\s*String\s+\w+\s*,\s*.*?boolean" --trim

Length of output: 74


Could you please run the above script to confirm that no lingering references to the removed parameter exist?


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the updated storePassphrase method in KeychainAccessProvider.java no longer includes the "requireOsAuthentication" parameter.
rg "storePassphrase\s*\([^)]*requireOsAuthentication" src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java

Length of output: 135


Simplified storePassphrase signature verified

The updated method signature in src/main/java/org/cryptomator/integrations/keychain/KeychainAccessProvider.java now correctly omits the requireOsAuthentication parameter, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives to streamline the API. No lingering references to the removed parameter were found.

purejava added a commit to purejava/keepassxc-cryptomator that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2025
Adhere to new version of integration-api
See: cryptomator/integrations-api#56
purejava added a commit to purejava/cryptomator-bitwarden that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2025
Adhere to new version of integration-api
See: cryptomator/integrations-api#56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant