Application Security Engine support

[blotus]

Add support for new items:

• appsec-rules
• appsec-configs

Add support for appsec tests.

[github-actions]

Hello @buixor,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @blotus,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @buixor and thank you for your contribution!

I'm a bot that helps maintainers to validate scenarios and ensure they include all the required information.
I've found some errors in your scenarios, please fix them and re-submit your PR, or ask for help if you need it.

The following items have errors:

crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-38205:

• bad CVE format: CCVE-2023-38205

Mitre ATT&CK

Information about mitre attack can be found here.
As an example, some common mitre attack techniques:

• T1110 for bruteforce attacks
• T1595 and T1190 for exploitation of public vulnerabilities
• T1595 for generic scanning of exposed applications

Expected format is (where XXXX is the technique ID):

labels:
  classification:
    - attack.TXXXX

CVEs

If your scenario covers a specific CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), please add it.

Expected format is (where CVE-XXX-XXX is the CVE ID):

labels:
  classification:
    - cve.CVE-XXX-XXX

Behaviors

Please identify the behavior(s) your scenario is targeting. You can find the list of available behaviors here.

Expected format is (where <behavior> is the behavior you want to target):

labels:
  behavior: <behavior>

See the labels documentation for more information.

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder and thank you for your contribution!

It seems that the following scenarios are not part of the 'crowdsecurity/appsec-virtual-patching' collection:

crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-38205
crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-24489
crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2021-3129
crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2021-22941
crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2019-12989
crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2022-44877

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[buixor]

👍

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

The new VPATCH Rule is compliant, thank you for your contribution!