Documentation: This and that

[amotl]

About

Just a bit of polishing the docs after initially publishing it, and to verify RTD PRB integration has been established now, so that previews work as expected.

Preview

https://cratedb-mcp--90.org.readthedocs.build/

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation sections reorganized across two files: README.md's Documentation section relocated within the document, and docs/index.md sections renamed with experimental note repositioned later.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation relocation README.md	Documentation section removed from earlier position and re-added later in document; no content changes
Section renaming and note relocation docs/index.md	Section headings renamed ("Documentation server" → "Documentation inquiry", "Health inquiry" → "Health status"); experimental note block relocated later in document; Markdown structure reflowed

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Verify section reorganization in README.md maintains logical flow
• Confirm section name changes in docs/index.md are consistent and accurate across the document
• Check that relocated note block position remains contextually appropriate

Possibly related PRs

• Documentation: Relocate content from README into individual pages #88: Both PRs reorganize and relocate documentation content across README.md and docs/index.md
• README: Improve unboxing experience #23: Overlapping structural edits to README and docs with similar relocation and reorganization patterns

Suggested reviewers

• bmunkholm
• surister
• kneth

Poem

🐰 With pen in paw and docs in sight,
We shuffle sections left and right,
Health status shines, inquiries gleam,
Documentation dreams supreme!
Order blooms where chaos lay—
A tidy warren saves the day! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request title 'Documentation: This and that' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms ('this and that') that don't convey meaningful information about the actual changes. While it indicates the changes are documentation-related, it fails to specify what was actually modified or improved.	Replace the vague title with a more specific description of the actual changes, such as 'Documentation: Rename sections and relocate notes in README and index' or 'Documentation: Update section headings and reorganize content'. This would clearly communicate the primary changes to reviewers scanning the pull request history.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The pull request description is related to the changeset and provides relevant context about the documentation polishing efforts and the purpose of the changes. While somewhat brief, it adequately explains that this is a documentation update following initial publication and mentions verification of RTD integration with a preview link.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch docs-more-2

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e4a306 and 3afc58b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md (1 hunks)
• docs/index.md (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (4)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: amotl
Repo: crate/cratedb-mcp PR: 17
File: CHANGES.md:5-5
Timestamp: 2025-05-16T13:35:04.487Z
Learning: For the cratedb-mcp repository, version numbers and release dates in CHANGES.md are updated by a dedicated "Release vX.Y.Z" commit as part of the release process, not during documentation preparation PRs.

Learnt from: amotl
Repo: crate/cratedb-mcp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T14:55:23.400Z
Learning: In the cratedb-mcp repository, the `backlog.md` document is intended as a functional planning document that doesn't need to adhere to strict formatting standards. Avoid pointing out formatting or layout shortcomings in this file during reviews.

📚 Learning: 2025-05-17T14:55:23.400Z

Learnt from: amotl
Repo: crate/cratedb-mcp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T14:55:23.400Z
Learning: In the cratedb-mcp repository, the `backlog.md` document is intended as a functional planning document that doesn't need to adhere to strict formatting standards. Avoid pointing out formatting or layout shortcomings in this file during reviews.

Applied to files:

• docs/index.md
• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-05-17T16:02:09.342Z

Learnt from: amotl
Repo: crate/cratedb-mcp PR: 24
File: pyproject.toml:76-76
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T16:02:09.342Z
Learning: For the cratedb-mcp project, FastMCP pre-2.0 releases provide the same API surface needed by the application, so a lower bound on the FastMCP dependency is not necessary.

Applied to files:

• docs/index.md
• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-05-16T13:35:04.487Z

Learnt from: amotl
Repo: crate/cratedb-mcp PR: 17
File: CHANGES.md:5-5
Timestamp: 2025-05-16T13:35:04.487Z
Learning: For the cratedb-mcp repository, version numbers and release dates in CHANGES.md are updated by a dedicated "Release vX.Y.Z" commit as part of the release process, not during documentation preparation PRs.

Applied to files:

• README.md

🔇 Additional comments (4)

README.md (1)

75-79: Documentation section is well-positioned and clear.

The new section logically separates the project description from metadata and provides a direct link to RTD with appropriate context.

docs/index.md (3)

10-10: Line range adjustment correctly excludes the new Documentation section.

The updated :end-line: 74 properly excludes the newly added Documentation section from README.md, which is appropriate for the docs/index.md reorganization.

---

69-69: Section renamings improve clarity and consistency.

The renamed sections—"Documentation inquiry" and "Health status"—are more descriptive and better reflect the tools' purposes. The terminology is now more consistent across the section.

Also applies to: 77-77

---

83-87: Experimental note relocation enhances visual prominence and document flow.

The standalone note block following the tools section provides clear, visually distinct caveats without interrupting the feature descriptions. Proper use of Sphinx note syntax.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}