[feat][evaluation]evaluator ecosystem

[tpfz]

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title.

• This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>]: <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
• The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
• Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
• This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese.

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese).

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ tpfz
❌ HearyShen

---

tpfz seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ tpfz
❌ HearyShen

---

tpfz seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[CozeLoop]

Blocking issues identified: several newly added HTTP handlers return 200 OK with empty payloads rather than invoking service logic; raw validation errors are exposed; GORM Debug() enabled in DAO; silent error handling on write path; and non-atomic multi-Update usage. Please address these before merge.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.34963% with 314 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...odules/evaluation/domain/service/evaluator_impl.go	70.52%	33 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
.../evaluation/infra/repo/evaluator/evaluator_impl.go	83.13%	31 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️
...nd/modules/evaluation/application/evaluator_app.go	85.76%	27 Missing and 12 partials ⚠️
...aluation/domain/service/evaluator_template_impl.go	79.14%	23 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
...on/infra/repo/evaluator/evaluator_template_impl.go	81.31%	21 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
...d/modules/evaluation/application/experiment_app.go	65.88%	18 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️
...ation/application/convertor/evaluator/evaluator.go	85.62%	18 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...lication/convertor/evaluator/evaluator_template.go	85.33%	15 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
...nd/api/handler/coze/loop/apis/evaluator_service.go	70.58%	10 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...kend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluator.go	75.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
... and 1 more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #277      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.03%   68.60%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files         568      575       +7     
  Lines       50482    52258    +1776     
==========================================
+ Hits        34345    35849    +1504     
- Misses      13470    13645     +175     
- Partials     2667     2764      +97     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.60% <82.34%> (+0.56%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../evaluation/application/convertor/common/common.go	98.68% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
backend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/common.go	88.88% <ø> (ø)
.../modules/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluator_tag.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...les/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluator_template.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tion/domain/entity/evaluator_version_custom_rpc.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
backend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/param.go	54.54% <ø> (ø)
...ation/domain/service/evaluator_source_code_impl.go	85.05% <100.00%> (ø)
...ion/domain/service/evaluator_source_prompt_impl.go	76.82% <100.00%> (+4.45%)	⬆️
backend/modules/evaluation/pkg/conf/evaluator.go	60.00% <ø> (-14.51%)	⬇️
...lity/domain/task/service/taskexe/tracehub/utils.go	90.66% <ø> (ø)
... and 11 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd543a8...c54575f. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.