-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(depinject): support for 29-fee #6154
feat(depinject): support for 29-fee #6154
Conversation
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
# Conflicts: # api/capability/v1/capability.pulsar.go # api/capability/v1/genesis.pulsar.go # api/go.mod # api/go.sum # api/ibc/applications/fee/v1/fee.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/fee/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/fee/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/interchain_accounts/controller/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/interchain_accounts/host/v1/host.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/interchain_accounts/host/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/interchain_accounts/v1/account.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/interchain_accounts/v1/packet.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/transfer/v1/authz.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/transfer/v1/genesis.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/transfer/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/applications/transfer/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/channel/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/channel/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/client/v1/client.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/client/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/client/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/commitment/v1/commitment.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/connection/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/core/connection/v1/tx.pulsar.go # api/ibc/lightclients/solomachine/v2/solomachine.pulsar.go # api/ibc/lightclients/solomachine/v3/solomachine.pulsar.go # api/ibc/lightclients/tendermint/v1/tendermint.pulsar.go # api/ibc/lightclients/wasm/v1/query.pulsar.go # api/ibc/lightclients/wasm/v1/tx.pulsar.go # e2e/go.mod # proto/buf.gen.pulsar.yaml
Quality Gate passed for 'ibc-go'Issues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's get this merged as well.
My main concerns around app wiring and how the dependency injection knows how to pass certain arguments such as ICS4Wrapper to each module when each can have a different keeper fulfilling that role.
As well as the other concerns around setting up the client/port routers correctly, but this should be doable I think!
Cdc codec.Codec | ||
Key *storetypes.KVStoreKey | ||
|
||
Ics4Wrapper porttypes.ICS4Wrapper |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same nit
Ics4Wrapper porttypes.ICS4Wrapper | |
ICS4Wrapper porttypes.ICS4Wrapper |
import "cosmos/app/v1alpha1/module.proto"; | ||
|
||
// Module is the config object of the 29-fee module. | ||
message Module { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have authority
for 29-fee, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, we don't
Description
Adding support for 29-fee package.
ref: #3560
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the GitHub PR explorer.SonarCloud Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.