-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: refactor(store/v2,server/v2): save genesis block at height 0 #22406
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Matt Kocubinski <[email protected]>
… kocu/tx-load-test
Important Review skippedIgnore keyword(s) in the title. ⛔ Ignored keywords (2)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
@@ -111,14 +121,20 @@ func (s *Server[T]) Stop(ctx context.Context) error { | |||
logger := GetLoggerFromContext(ctx) | |||
logger.With(log.ModuleKey, s.Name()).Info("stopping servers...") | |||
|
|||
g, ctx := errgroup.WithContext(ctx) | |||
// cannot reuse context as it's already canceled, so create a new one for stopping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this resolves #22405, could you extract in a seperate PR? It is unrelated to the genesis issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's still a problem with it... Stop()
can be called before Start()
completes. >.<
I think the start command needs another look. I will probably reverse this change in this branch before r4r, but right now it's helpful during development.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this super easily fixable by deferring the Stop instead of doing what we do now?
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
package benchmark |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it may make more sense to put this in tools
treeOpts.StateStorage = true | ||
treeOpts.EvictionDepth = 20 | ||
treeOpts.HeightFilter = 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should these be config values?
obviated by #22435 |
Description
Depends on: cosmos/iavl#1002
core
Version
field tocore/store.Changeset
.store/v2
WorkingHash(store.Changeset)
from all store/v2 interfaces.store/v2.VersionedWriter.ApplyChangeset
is now 1-arity,version
parameter removed (it's now in the Changeset)store/v2/root.Commit(store.Changeset)
now passesversion
to the commit store from the Changeset instead of fetching from SC on write.SetCommitHeader
from root store interface (unused)server/v2
InitChain
now callsCommit(store.Changeset)
instead ofWorkingHash(store.Changeset)
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...