Bump onnxruntime to 1.24.4 and add Python 3.14 by jviehhauser · Pull Request #177 · conda-forge/onnxruntime-feedstock

jviehhauser · 2026-04-01T20:18:00Z

Summary

Bumps onnxruntime from 1.24.2 to 1.24.4
Adds Python 3.14 support (drops Python 3.10 — upstream now requires >= 3.11)
Switches Linux runners from decommissioned cirun-openstack-cpu-4xlarge to Cirrus runners (ghcr.io/cirruslabs/ubuntu-runner-amd64:24.04-lg)
Removes deprecated self_hosted from conda-forge.yml (fixes linter warning)
Re-rendered with conda-smithy 3.59.0

Motivation

The Python 3.14 migration PR (#163) was blocked by a segfault in onnxruntime on Python 3.14 (upstream issue microsoft/onnxruntime#27392). This was fixed upstream in v1.24.3 via microsoft/onnxruntime#27413 (refcount bug in map input conversion). The reporter confirmed the fix on win-64, linux-64, and osx-arm64.

v1.24.4 is a patch release containing additional bug fixes. It also bumps python_requires to >= 3.11, so Python 3.10 is dropped from the build matrix.

All 4 existing patches were verified to still apply cleanly to v1.24.4.

CI runner changes

The Quansight Open GPU Server (OpenStack) was decommissioned on 2026-03-13 (conda-forge/.cirun#174), causing all Linux GHA jobs to time out after 24h waiting for runners that no longer exist. This PR switches Linux builds to Cirrus runners (access granted via conda-forge/admin-requests#1982). Windows builds remain on cirun-azure-windows-4xlarge.

Supersedes #163 and #176.

Test plan

osx-arm64 builds pass (all Python versions including 3.14)
Linux builds pass on Cirrus runners
Windows builds pass on cirun-azure
Python 3.10 builds are correctly skipped

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-01T20:19:35Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

❌ In conda-forge.yml: $.github_actions = {'self_hosted': True, 'timeout_minutes': 720, 'triggers': ['push', 'pull_request']}.

{'self_hosted': True, 'timeout_minutes': 720, 'triggers': ['push', 'pull_request']} is not valid under any of the given schemas
Schema
```
{
  "anyOf": [
    {
      "$ref": "#/$defs/GithubActionsConfig"
    },
    {
      "type": "null"
    }
  ]
}
```

For recipe/meta.yaml:

ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). This parser is not currently used by conda-forge, but may be in the future. We are collecting information to see which recipes are compatible with grayskull.
ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/23869425105. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

jviehhauser · 2026-04-01T20:48:14Z

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-01T20:52:06Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/23870122707. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-01T20:52:24Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/23870136963. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-01T21:07:08Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). This parser is not currently used by conda-forge, but may be in the future. We are collecting information to see which recipes are compatible with grayskull.
ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/25367859258. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

cbourjau · 2026-04-02T21:55:44Z

Do we expect the GitHub-hosted runners to be beefy enough to build the CUDA builds? Either way, the cirun ones are still referenced here. I don't think that this is ready, is it?

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-02T23:24:33Z

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

linter: passed
azure: passed
github-actions: failed

Thus the PR was not passing and not merged.

cbourjau · 2026-04-07T09:13:59Z

conda-forge/admin-requests#1982 provides an alternative for the Linux runners, but I'm not sure what the solution for Windows is, yet. Either way, this PR is not ready to be merged.

jviehhauser · 2026-04-07T11:24:31Z

Updated to switch Linux builds to Cirrus runners (see also conda-forge/.cirun#174). Windows builds remain on cirun-azure-windows-4xlarge for now.

0xbe7a · 2026-04-09T13:20:06Z

Is this PR for now just blocked on maintainer approval for the workflow run, or are there other blockers? If it’s just that, can @janjagusch or @cbourjau approve it please?

diegoferigo-rai · 2026-04-09T15:45:43Z

@jviehhauser would it be possible to activate linux-aarch64 GPU entries in the build matrix? As I did in:

Try compiling cuda version on linux-aarch64 #172.

Relevant comment: #172 (comment).

jviehhauser · 2026-04-10T09:49:49Z

@diegoferigo-rai Done — removed the skip directive for linux-aarch64 CUDA builds (as per your commit in #172).

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

cbourjau · 2026-04-10T10:23:11Z

@jviehhauser please reduce the build matrix to something minmal first (e.g. only python 3.14 and no -novec) so that we can try out the aarch64 builds.

cbourjau · 2026-04-10T10:25:58Z

Is this PR for now just blocked on maintainer approval for the workflow run, or are there other blockers? If it’s just that, can @janjagusch or @cbourjau approve it please?

We don't have a way to build for Windows+CUDA, currently. We can't merge this as is. We either have to drop those builds or wait a little longer to see how this is resolved upstream (my preference).

jviehhauser · 2026-04-10T11:19:38Z

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

diegoferigo-rai · 2026-04-10T11:32:35Z

We don't have a way to build for Windows+CUDA, currently. We can't merge this as is. We either have to drop those builds or wait a little longer to see how this is resolved upstream (my preference).

Would it make sense to drop the currently unavailable platforms for now and reintroduce them later? If resolving this upstream takes several weeks, blocking all other builds seems unnecessary. Updated CUDA linux-aarch64 binaries have already been missing for a while, it would be great to move forward in the meantime.

jaimergp · 2026-04-12T19:26:39Z

Hey all, please check conda-forge/admin-requests#2008 for some news about larger runners. Either Namespace or Blacksmith should provide beefy machines for CPU builds across all platforms. Ping me for any questions!

jviehhauser · 2026-04-12T20:43:11Z

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

jviehhauser · 2026-04-12T20:46:49Z

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

cbourjau · 2026-04-14T13:41:34Z

Upstream runners seem to be sorted out. Let's see if the Windows builds as expected. If so, I'll fan-out to to the full build matrix.

cbourjau · 2026-04-14T16:24:35Z

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

conda-forge-admin · 2026-04-14T16:27:09Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the GitHub Actions workflow below for more details. You can also ping conda-forge/core (using the @ notation) for further assistance or you can try rerendering locally.

The following suggestions might help debug any issues:

Is the recipe/{meta.yaml,recipe.yaml} file valid?
If there is a recipe/conda-build-config.yaml file in the feedstock make sure that it is compatible with the current global pinnings.
Is the fork used for this PR on an organization or user GitHub account? Automated rerendering via the webservices admin bot only works for user GitHub accounts.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/24410596181. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

cbourjau · 2026-04-14T18:06:26Z

Current status: There still seems to be some issue with the Windows builds. I had to manually edit some generated files to get the build going, which isn't viable, but at least allows us to see if they work otherwise. Cross-referencing the conda-simthy issue: conda-forge/conda-smithy#2527

jviehhauser · 2026-04-28T10:59:34Z

Update: Whenever conda-forge/conda-smithy#2529 lands (just merged) in a new release, we should be good to go with this.

cbourjau · 2026-04-28T12:03:55Z

Update: Whenever conda-forge/conda-smithy#2529 lands (just merged) in a new release, we should be good to go with this.

Actually, it turns out that the issue in question only affects Blacksmith runners, not Namespace which is what is used since the latest commit.

diegoferigo-rai · 2026-05-04T19:14:45Z

Hi, what's the current status of this PR? Sorry to raise this again, but if the issues are limited to a single platform, could we temporarily disable that platform and proceed with the others? It seems unreasonable to keep releases blocked for months over one platform's outstanding issues.

cbourjau · 2026-05-04T19:47:10Z

#171 ist almost done and keeps Python 3.10. If I can't fix the remaining issue there tomorrow I'll trigger the build.

cbourjau

I squashed the commits a bit. This ran through much better than I expected 🚀

jviehhauser · 2026-05-05T18:41:56Z

Thanks, @cbourjau

larsoner · 2026-05-05T18:45:31Z

The commit on main seems to be failing

https://github.com/conda-forge/onnxruntime-feedstock/actions/runs/25391311054/job/74466252157

Once it finishes we can ping the conda-forge folks to restart it, but it suggests some limits might need to be adjusted

larsoner · 2026-05-05T21:31:47Z

@jviehhauser can you see if you have permissions to restart the job? If not I can spam the conda help-python folks, but maybe now that it's running on GHA (rather than Azure) they have permissions set up to allow it... 🤞

diegoferigo-rai · 2026-05-06T08:24:24Z

Thank you @cbourjau, appreciate all your work! 🚀

larsoner · 2026-05-06T13:27:06Z

Yes thanks @cbourjau (and thanks @jtilly for restarting the failed build twice)!

jviehhauser force-pushed the bump-1.24.4-py314 branch from 2d4d184 to ad3d170 Compare April 1, 2026 20:31

jviehhauser marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 21:08

jviehhauser requested review from cbourjau, hmaarrfk, janjagusch, jtilly, traversaro and xhochy as code owners April 1, 2026 21:08

hmaarrfk added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Apr 1, 2026

cbourjau removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Apr 7, 2026

jaimergp reviewed Apr 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread recipe/conda_build_config.yaml Outdated

jviehhauser requested a review from jaimergp April 12, 2026 21:15

larsoner reviewed Apr 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread recipe/meta.yaml Outdated

jaimergp mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026

Migrate to namespace / blacksmith conda-forge/admin-requests#2089

Open

22 tasks

cbourjau added 5 commits May 5, 2026 11:09

Use pixi and compile osx_arm64 natively

02f55ea

Migrate to new runners

3df556f

Update meta.yaml and build scripts

db550d3

Python 3.14 migration

9bb2d30

Rerender

ca79009

cbourjau force-pushed the bump-1.24.4-py314 branch from b60300c to ca79009 Compare May 5, 2026 09:13

cbourjau approved these changes May 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

cbourjau merged commit 0b5773b into conda-forge:main May 5, 2026
59 checks passed

diegoferigo mentioned this pull request May 6, 2026

Try compiling cuda version on linux-aarch64 #172

Closed

5 tasks

jviehhauser deleted the bump-1.24.4-py314 branch May 6, 2026 16:24

Uh oh!

Conversation

jviehhauser commented Apr 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Motivation

CI runner changes

Test plan

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 1, 2026

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 2, 2026

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 2, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 7, 2026

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

0xbe7a commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

diegoferigo-rai commented Apr 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 10, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 10, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 10, 2026

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 10, 2026

Uh oh!

diegoferigo-rai commented Apr 10, 2026

Uh oh!

jaimergp commented Apr 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 12, 2026

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented Apr 28, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented Apr 28, 2026

Uh oh!

diegoferigo-rai commented May 4, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau commented May 4, 2026

Uh oh!

cbourjau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jviehhauser commented May 5, 2026

Uh oh!

larsoner commented May 5, 2026

Uh oh!

larsoner commented May 5, 2026

Uh oh!

diegoferigo-rai commented May 6, 2026

jviehhauser commented Apr 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Apr 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

jviehhauser commented Apr 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

diegoferigo-rai commented Apr 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading